Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치

@FastStockNewsUSA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40,316subscribers

+77 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001586367974
TypeChannel
Username@FastStockNewsUSA
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FastStockNewsUSA

Growth

40,23940,31640,277.56 August 2026 — 40,239 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,244 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,258 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,269 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,275 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,279 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,309 subscribers13 August 2026 — 40,316 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,227–40,328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:3540,316+7
12 Aug 2026, 05:2240,309+30
11 Aug 2026, 03:1240,279+4
10 Aug 2026, 06:0440,275+6
9 Aug 2026, 03:5340,269+11
8 Aug 2026, 02:4140,258+14
7 Aug 2026, 00:4040,244+5
6 Aug 2026, 02:3740,239first reading

Engagement

118 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 40,316 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,090
118 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.327%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
118
of 118 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held118 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total719,049
Reactions total2,354
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,053 reactions across 98 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,04050.7%
🔥20710.1%
😈1959.50%
👍1909.25%
👏733.56%
😱512.48%
😨381.85%
😁371.80%
❤‍🔥351.70%
💯341.66%
🤯271.32%
💊211.02%
😇190.925%
😐190.925%
🤡170.828%
🤔160.779%
👻150.731%
60.292%
🎉40.195%
20.097%
5 further kinds70.341%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,354reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈4,250 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

미국 근원 소비자물가지수(CPI, 전년 동기 대비)(7월) 실제치: 2.5% (이전치 2.6% 대비); 예상치 2.5% ...

8😈2

12 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈3,440 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✅ [속보]美 7월 CPI 0.1%p↑,연율 3.4%로 예상치보다 적게 올라 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/015/0005320286

🔥115👏2😈1

12 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC≈6,130 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Samsung_Global_AI_SWPhoto

오픈AI, 내일 깜짝 발표 예고 이전에 Codex의 추가 활성 사용자 수가 100만 명 늘어날 때마다 한 번씩 리셋을 제공하겠다고 약속했습니다. 1,000만 명까지요. 그런데 우리는 이미 그 숫자를 넘어섰고, 1,000만 명을 돌파한 이후로는 별다른 이야기를 하지 않았습니다. 내일 여러분을 위한 작은 깜짝 선물이 있습니다. → 리셋 or 1,500만 명 or 1,500만 명 기념 리셋 https://t.me/Samsung_Global_AI_SW

16😈2😁1

12 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC≈6,830 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @free_life59

#AI #CITAEL 1. 시타델 증권은 8월 미국 증시의 핵심 리스크를 “무엇이 망가질까”보다 “누가 더 높은 가격에서도 사줄까”로 전환해 해석함. 2. 실적 서프라이즈, 밸류에이션 부담 완화, 시스템 자금 재레버리징 여지, 리테일 복귀, 패시브 유입, 자사주 매입 재개가 동시에 매수 기반을 강화함. 3. 시장 내부에서는 breadth 개선과 correlation 하락이 진행되며 지수 장세에서 종목 장세로의 전환 가능성이 커짐. 4. 변동성 하락과 콜옵션 수요 급증은 단순 안도 랠리가 아니라 “우측 꼬리(upside convexity)”를 사는 단계로 심리가 이동 중임. 5. 다만 시타델도 9월은 계절성과 포지셔닝 부담으로 8월보다 까다로운 구간이 될 수 있음을 경고함.

53

12 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC≈4,110 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HANAchina

>>서버 DDR5 메모리 가격 이달 15~23% 전면 상승 •3분기 메모리 제조사들의 가격 인상이 이어지면서 이달 서버용 DDR5 가격이 15-23% 상승. 32GB·64GB·96GB DDR5 RDIMM 가격은 각각 900달러·1,590달러·2,650달러까지 올랐음. 현물시장에서는 각각 1,8002,100달러·3,0003,200달러·3,800~4,100달러 수준으로 거래되고 있음 •제조사의 DDR5 공급은 여전히 수요를 충족하지 못하는 상황이지만, 계약가격이 분기마다 상승하면서 대형 서버 고객들의 메모리 비용 부담에 대한 민감도도 높아지고 있음. •장기공급계약(LTA)이 잇따라 체결되면서 대형 고객의 DDR5 공급이 일정 부분 확보된 만큼, 향후 DDR5 가격 상승폭은 점차 완만해질 전망 >《科创板日报》12日讯,随着三季度原厂价格进一步上

9😈2🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC≈6,840 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✅ 알리바바, 100일이면 데이터센터 완성…美와 인프라 속도전 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/015/0005320017?rc=N&ntype=RANKING&sid=001

5😈4

12 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC≈6,050 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @EMchina

금융시장에서 자금 빠져나가기 시작. 미국 주식에서 점점 더 돈 벌기 어려워지는 중 • 영국 베테랑 거시전략가 Michael Howell은 세계 경제는 금융 자금 풀과 실물 자금 풀, 두 개의 자금 풀로 나눌 수 있다고 평가 • 중앙은행 유동성은 금융에 먼저 유입되어 자산시장을 견인. 그 주기는 실물경제를 15개월, 자산시장을 6~9개월 선행 • 지난해 말 유동성 모멘텀은 정점 이후 하락세 전환. 미국 증시에 이미 압박 시작 • 지금의 높은 변동성 & 낮은 수익률 국면에서 긴축의 주된 원인은 금리인상 아닌 실물경제의 자금 흡수 • 채권 금리 상승, 암호화폐 하락, 원자재 상승. 자금이 금융에서 실물로 흘러가면서 미국 주식으로 돈 벌기는 더 어려워짐 钱开始离开金融市场,美股越来越难赚 英国资深宏观策略师Michael Howell表示全球经济分

😱63🤔2😈2

12 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC≈5,440 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HANAchina

>>칩을 살 돈이 없다면? NVIDIA·월가, AI 연산을 금융상품으로 만든다 •NVIDIA가 Apollo·BlackRock·Blackstone 등 월가 대형 금융사들과 손잡고 5,000억 달러 규모의 AI 칩 증권화 금융 체계 구축을 추진 •특수목적법인(SPV)을 통해 GPU를 주택담보대출과 유사한 방식의 새로운 금융자산으로 패키징해, 자금 조달에 어려움을 겪는 중소 AI 기업에도 자금 조달 통로를 열겠다는 구상 •하지만 짧은 GPU의 경제적 수명, NVIDIA 자체의 보증·지원에 따른 순환금융 논란, 그리고 현재까지 실제 조달된 자금이 전무하다는 점이 걸림돌 •1970년대 MBS 혁명에 비견되는 금융 혁신이지만, 현재로서는 기대와 위험 사이에서 아슬아슬하게 추진되고 있는 단계라는 평가 >买不起芯片怎么办?英伟达联手华尔街,把AI算力变

🔥3😈3

12 Aug 2026, 03:26 UTC≈3,370 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cahier_de_market

* 매우 중요한 내용이 많이 나온 Cantor의 FMS 리뷰 - "비트 수요가 공급을 5~10%포인트 상회하며 이 격차가 이번 10년 내내 지속될 것"이라는 언급 - 컨센서스는 향후 2개 분기 내 메모리 가격 정점을 예상하고 있지만, 업계 관계자들과의 펀더멘털 논의는 전혀 다른 이야기를 전하고 있음 - (루빈울트라의 HBM) 디스펙과 관련해서는 투자자들이 원인을 잘못 해석하고 있음. 이는 전적으로 공급 가용성의 문제이지 수요 파괴가 아님 - HBM4 가격계약 : SK하이닉스가 엔비디아에 GB당 32달러, 브로드컴에 36달러, AMD에 40달러로 계약을 확정한 것으로 파악 - 트렌드포스는 낸드에 대해 27년 하반기부터 가격하락을 예상했는데, 그러나 Cantor의 대화는 상당히 긍정적이었고 부정적 데이터 포인트는 어디에서도 찾을 수

17😈3

12 Aug 2026, 01:29 UTC≈6,140 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @teamctrinePhoto

미국의 데이터센터 건설 투자액은 2021년 이후 거의 9배 증가했습니다.

10😈2

11 Aug 2026, 23:55 UTC≈5,710 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Samsung_Global_AI_SWPhoto

엔비디아, 세계 최고 수준 오픈소스 AI 모델 목표로 ‘Nemotron 4’ 개발 : 엔비디아는 차세대 오픈소스 모델 Nemotron 4 개발에 대규모 투자. 최상위 모델을 세계 최고 수준의 오픈소스 AI 모델과 대등한 성능으로 끌어올리는 것이 목표 : Nemotron 4는 최소 1조 파라미터 규모로 예상. 6월 출시된 Nemotron 3 Ultra 대비 약 2배 규모 : 사전학습 데이터와 아키텍처 일부는 결정됐지만 최종 학습은 아직 시작하지 않은 상태. 이르면 올해 늦가을 출시 가능 : 자체 모델 학습을 위한 컴퓨팅 투자도 확대. 엔비디아는 자사 GPU를 구매한 클라우드 사업자로부터 서버를 다시 임대하고 있으며, 2031년 초까지 클라우드 서비스 약정 규모는 280억 달러로 전년 대비 약 3배 증가 : 엔비디아는 다양한 오픈 모델이

8😈2

11 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC≈5,890 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✅ [미국 특징주] 엔비디아 CDS 프리미엄 하락...AI 금융 계획 해명 효과 https://www.newspim.com/news/view/20260812000089

6😈4

Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @FastStockNewsUSA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 57,969 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치” (@FastStockNewsUSA), 40,316 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FastStockNewsUSA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.