Channel
@Thoughts_BFox
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,702subscribers
+92 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002556510058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Thoughts_BFox |
| Description | BFox의 생각 정리하는 방 돈 되는건 뭐든지 다 합니다. DM : @BFox_xx X : https://x.com/BFox_xx 본 채널에서 제공하는 모든 정보는 단순한 시장 정보 및 종목 소개를 위한 것이며, 특정 종목의 매수·매도를 권유하거나 투자 자문을 제공하는 것이 아닙니다. 본 채널의 어떠한 내용도 투자 판단의 근거로 활용되어서는 안 되며, 투자로 인한 손실에 대한 책임은 전적으로 투자자 본인에게 있습니다. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Thoughts_BFox |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 14,702 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 14,708 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 14,704 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 14,697 | +84 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:20 | 14,613 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 14,608 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 14,599 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 14,610 | first reading |
74 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 61 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 74 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 275,960 |
| Reactions total | 1,580 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,371 reactions across 46 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5332380332400331065 | 540 | 39.4% | |
| custom 5825662445946934723 | 414 | 30.2% | |
| custom 5447633808398499576 | 277 | 20.2% | |
| custom 5994552646063625376 | 140 | 10.2% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,580reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Entropy 가입 링크 일단 자러 가기전에 올려놓고 자러 갈게요. 제 링크로 가입한 분들한테 드릴 수 있는 혜택같은게 있을텐데, 이부분은 지금 이야기해서 다 받아오기엔 시간이 늦어서 설명해달라고 이야기 해뒀어요. (레퍼럴로 발생하는 수익은 채널에서 다 이래저래 뿌릴 예정입니다.)
custom 53323803324003310653custom 54476338083984995761
Entropy 관심있으신분들 계실까요? 저도 팀이랑 컨텍이 되서, 아직 뭘 하겠다고 확정을 한건 없지만.. 그래도 남들 받아오는 혜택정도는 어느정도 받아올 수 있지 않을까해서요. 초대형 채널급은 아니겠지만..;
어닝잘나온애들 추격매수한거 all closed 잠깐 지켜볼게요
custom 582566244594693472335
월요일에 눌렸던 광통신쪽도 다시 불반등중
custom 599455264606362537618custom 58256624459469347231
오선 펌 그래도 많이 진정이 됬네요. 전쟁이 없던 세계선은 과연 어땟을까..
custom 533238033240033106519custom 58256624459469347232
코어위브, 네비우스, smci등 오늘 실적 좋게나온 종목들 안도해서 더 달려버리는 분위기 결국 이러면 본장 열려봐야 알기때문에..
custom 533238033240033106512
전부다 컨센 부합이네요. 세부내용 찾아봐야겠네요..
custom 599455264606362537619
내일 CPI 개인적 모델 예상치 공유 HL CPI YoY 3.3 / MoM 0.1 Cr CPI YoY 2.5 / MoM 0.2 - 컨센 HL CPI YoY 3.4 / MoM 0.1 Cr CPI YoY 2.5 / MoM 0.2 언제나 모델은 정확도가 떨어질 수 있으며, 월드컵 효과가 드러난 고용과 물가에 미친 영향이 일치할지가 관심.
custom 54476338083984995768
그냥 킵해뒀다가 나중에 또 뭐 쌓이면 뿌리겠습니다. 지금 레퍼럴 링크 올릴만한건 FOMO밖에 없던데
custom 54476338083984995761
온도 펖덱 링크뿌린거로 100달러를 벌었습니다. 이벤트로 뿌릴까 하는데 이벤트 아이디어 추천좀
제가쓰는 대시보드는 뭐 이런식인데 (2주전꺼라 업데이트는 더 되어있음) 토스랑 한투 api 연동해서 실제로 딸깍하면 거래도 되고 알고리즘 트레이딩도 다 만들어놨는데 아직 활용은 못하고 있음..
custom 599455264606362537622custom 53323803324003310658custom 54476338083984995766
예상 개선 방향 1. Cpi pce같은 데이터 나오게 할거임 2. 국내 공시는 그대로 둘듯, 이미 다른 공개채널들 비교해도 속도 안밀림 3. 실적 예상치 및 위스퍼링 넘버 따다가 직관적으로좀 잘 보이게 변경예정 4. 미국 공시는 좀 더 필터링 빡세게 걸 예정 5. 모르겠다 쓰면서 이것저것 고쳐봄 피드백도 받음
custom 533238033240033106535custom 58256624459469347235custom 59945526460636253764
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @Thoughts_BFox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 40,837 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“생각 정리하는 방” (@Thoughts_BFox), 14,702 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Thoughts_BFox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.