주식 투자를 잘하는 사람의 성격 '💯'

Channel
주린이 개소리하는 채널
@Dogrini
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,770subscribers
-63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001711968972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dogrini |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dogrini |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 4,770 | +10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 4,760 | -17 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 4,777 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 4,787 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 4,797 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 4,806 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 4,809 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 4,814 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 4,815 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 4,816 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 4,821 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 4,827 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 4,832 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 4,833 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 34s
- Average length
- 1m 34s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
68 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 19.1% | |
| 😭 | 12 | 17.6% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 13.2% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 8.82% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 8.82% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 8.82% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
이새끼만 없애도 엔비디아 디램 탑재 늘릴수 있는거 아니냐
🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
누가 얘네한테 동시호가라는걸 좀 알려줘 https://n.news.naver.com/article/018/0006346201?cds=news_edit
😁2
회사에 돈벌러 나오냐와 군대 강제로 왔냐, 수련회 놀러왔냐로 조기단련된 한국인이 있습니다 많은 채용 부탁
😁1
ㅇㅎ 신안 1조 추경ㅋㅋ
😇2🔥1
켄 그리핀 (Citadel) 금일 발언 없음 (최근 스탠스: AI를 "가비지"라고 폄하했던 기존 입장에서 선회해 AI가 "기업가정신의 황금기"를 열 것이라는 쪽으로 견해를 바꿈) 숏 스퀴즈 시킬 땐 쓰레기라고 하고, 자기가 포지션 가져오니까 황금이라고 하고 존경합니다. 선생님
❤2🤮2
미국 좋소 사장 마인드 ㄷㄷ
🤣4
낭만..
❤6🤨3❤🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
왜 빠짐?
🤔6🤣2
오늘 매매에 참고하세용!!
✍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Dogrini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@easobi · 23,597
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
@daegurr · 23,375
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,651
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@athletes_village · 21,621
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
@bumgore · 35,352
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,509
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,309
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,411
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@cahier_de_market · 22,505
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
@FastStockNews · 128,921
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@darthacking · 65,078
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@gaoshoukorea · 41,159
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@sunstudy1234 · 54,428
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@HANAchina · 35,301
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@kimcharger · 24,877
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@habit4117 · 27,930
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@pharmbiohana · 29,812
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
@pikachu_aje · 25,217
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
@growthresearch · 40,159
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@ym_research · 40,071
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@tazastock · 40,320
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@jeilstock · 26,408
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,581
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@survival_DoPB · 22,243
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“주린이 개소리하는 채널” (@Dogrini), 4,770 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dogrini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.