Photo, posted without a caption
❤7

Channel
@gaoshoukorea
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
41,139subscribers
+930 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001260023521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gaoshoukorea |
| Description | 재야의고수들 필진이 작성한 글은 ▪️︎개인의 주관적 관점에서 작성되었습니다.▪️︎오류의 내용을 포함할 수 있습니다.▪️︎특정 주식의 매수매도 추천이 아닙니다.▪️︎ 필진이 보유한 주식에 관한 내용일 수 있고, 해당 주식을 언제든 매수/매도할 수 있습니다. 📍투자 판단과 결과에 대한 책임은 전적으로 투자자 본인에게 있습니다. 감사합니다. |
| Created | 21 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gaoshoukorea |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:59 | 41,139 | +6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 41,133 | +9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 41,124 | +17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 41,107 | +59 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 41,048 | +59 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 40,989 | +133 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 40,856 | +207 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:50 | 40,649 | +419 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 40,230 | +21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 40,209 | first reading |
167 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 164 of 166 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 167 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 805,513 |
| Reactions total | 3,401 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,401 reactions across 162 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,414 | 41.6% | |
| 👍 | 770 | 22.6% | |
| 🔥 | 509 | 15.0% | |
| 🎉 | 387 | 11.4% | |
| 🙏 | 321 | 9.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 164 of the 167 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,401reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 167 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7
반도체 케미칼
👍3❤1
2026.08.14 15:32:57 기업명: 이수페타시스(시가총액: 7조 179억) A007660 보고서명: 반기보고서 (2026.06) 잠정실적 : N 매출액 : 3,799억(예상치 : 3,630억, +4.7%) 영업익 : 771억(예상치 : 752억, +2.5%) 순이익 : 597억(예상치 : 594억, +0.5%) **최근 실적 추이** (기간/ 매출/ 영업익/ 순익) 2026.2Q 3,799억/ 771억/ 597억 2026.1Q 3,403억/ 672억/ 504억 2025.4Q 2,980억/ 565억/ 436억 2025.3Q 2,961억/ 584억/ 472억 2025.2Q 2,414억/ 421억/ 314억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260814002283
❤10👍4🔥3🎉2🙏2
미국 7월 소매판매 shock 고용 둔화 + 월드컵 효과 소진
👍9🔥2
💎 재야의고수들 프리미엄 쟁곳간 3Q26 중간모집 ✔️ 커버주식표 大공개 : 커버중인 주식들을 유형, 목적, 섹터별로 한눈에 보실 수 있습니다. ① 전체 커버주식 1년 평균수익률 : 46.3% (2023/10/01~2026/08/13 총 1048일) ② 커버종료주식 평균수익률 : 66.3% (평균커버기간 320일, 커버종료주식수 78개) ③ 커버진행주식 평균수익률 : 28.9% (평균커버기간 559일, 커버진행주식수 89개) * 컴플라이언스 노티스 그래픽 참고 ✔️ 3Q26 축하드립니다 68회 달성 : 주가가 커버 이래 더 높으면서 당일 8% 이상 상승할 때 말씀드립니다. * 대상기간 : 2026/07/01~2026/08/13 (총 44일) ✏️ 쟁곳간 구독신청하기(클릭) ① 한달체험 8만원 (구독기간 : 1개월, 09/01~09/30)…
❤10👍5🔥2
좁고 좁은 저 문으로 들어가는 길은 나를 깎고 잘라서 스스로 작아지는 것 뿐 이젠 버릴 것 조차 거의 남은 게 없는데 문득 거울을 보니 자존심 하나가 남았네 신해철 선생님 사랑합니다 ❤️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiGa6SH5yxg&list=RDxiGa6SH5yxg&start_radio=1 #음악 #민물장어의꿈
🔥7❤2🙏1
코스피
🎉13❤5👍5
베센트 재무장관: 이란에 전례 없는 조치를 시행할 것
🎉18🔥7❤6🙏1
[Day by Day 코멘트] 미장에서 샌디스크 급등과 범 엔비디아 섹터 강세 코스피 위주 상승 예상됨. 중요 위치로 안착하는지 확인필요 코스닥은 어제에 이어 상대적 견조함 유지하는지 확인필요 이는 다시 두 반도체 위주의 시장이 되는지 가늠대가 될 듯 이전의 과도한 쏠림 장세와는 다를 것으로 보고 있으나 ADR 지수가 높아 확산은 어려운 측면있음 연일 상승과 연휴 앞두고 있어 장 후반으로 갈수로 차익실현 매물도 전반은 긍정적 시각 유지합니다.
🔥12❤7🎉1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10🔥1
>>AI 완전 부활… 한국 증시 강세장이 돌아왔음 (대만공상시보) •레버리지 강제청산이 끝나고 반도체주가 회복한 데다 Fed의 금리 인상 전망이 약해지면서 한국 증시는 7월 말 저점에서 20% 넘게 급반등. KOSPI는 13일 3.56% 상승한 6,813.34로 마감하며 4거래일 연속 상승했고, 7월 30일 저점 대비 21.8% 올라 기술적으로 강세장에 진입 •7월에는 AI 대규모 지출 우려와 레버리지 강제청산, 해외 메모리 매도로 한국 증시가 급락했지만, 강제청산 종료와 숏커버링, 삼성전자와 SK하이닉스의 펀더멘털 회복이 반등 견인 •이번 반등의 지속 여부는 삼성전자와 SK하이닉스의 펀더멘털이 높아진 시장 기대를 따라갈 수 있는지에 달려 있음. 미국 기술기업들의 강한 실적과 지속적인 AI 투자 계획은 메모리 수요를 뒷받침. 다만 한국 …
❤10🔥3
https://biz.sbs.co.kr/article/20000328604?division=NAVER 단기적 기술적 강세장 진입
🎉5🔥4👍3🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 167 posts we hold for @gaoshoukorea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
향후 시장 수급이 전닉에 다시 강하게 쏠릴 것으로 보시나요?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 167 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 97,920 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“재야의 고수들” (@gaoshoukorea), 41,139 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gaoshoukorea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.