맘에 드는 문장이라 공유하고 싶어서....좋은밤 되십쇼.
❤174👍23💘18🤔9🥰5🤩2😘1

Channel
@one_going
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
48,209subscribers
+2,319 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002249953555 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @one_going |
| Description | 핵심만, 심플하고, 간결하게, 쉽게 |
| Created | Between 1 July 2024 and 30 November 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/one_going |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 21:48 | 48,209 | +129 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:39 | 48,080 | +36 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:08 | 48,044 | -10 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:38 | 48,054 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:27 | 48,063 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:01 | 48,058 | +30 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:14 | 48,028 | +30 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:04 | 47,998 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:31 | 48,003 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:17 | 48,007 | +4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 48,003 | +18 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 47,985 | +8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 47,977 | +19 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:05 | 47,958 | +22 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 47,936 | +5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:07 | 47,931 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 47,927 | +2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 47,925 | +24 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 47,901 | +18 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:45 | 47,883 | first reading |
612 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 612 (2 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,904,470 |
| Reactions total | 34,686 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 00:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
112,292 reactions across 610 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46,987 | 41.8% | |
| 👍 | 34,127 | 30.4% | |
| 😭 | 8,460 | 7.53% | |
| 😁 | 6,162 | 5.49% | |
| 🔥 | 2,409 | 2.15% | |
| 💯 | 2,082 | 1.85% | |
| 🥰 | 1,958 | 1.74% | |
| 🤔 | 1,860 | 1.66% | |
| 🤣 | 1,601 | 1.43% | |
| 💘 | 1,561 | 1.39% | |
| 😢 | 1,358 | 1.21% | |
| ✍ | 984 | 0.876% | |
| 🙈 | 480 | 0.427% | |
| 😴 | 436 | 0.388% | |
| 😘 | 378 | 0.337% | |
| 🫡 | 335 | 0.298% | |
| 😇 | 314 | 0.28% | |
| 😍 | 299 | 0.266% | |
| 🐳 | 153 | 0.136% | |
| 🤡 | 149 | 0.133% | |
| 2 further kinds | 199 | 0.177% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 612 of the 612 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112,851 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 612 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 177 posts held from the last 30 days (5.08%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
맘에 드는 문장이라 공유하고 싶어서....좋은밤 되십쇼.
❤174👍23💘18🤔9🥰5🤩2😘1
😭😭😭 고단한 10월 이후죠. 그냥 모든 자산 다 내림. 역배열뒤엔 항상 정배열이 기다리니깐. 전 그런맘으로 매매하다가 물리고 있습니다.😭😭
😭143❤40👍20🤣15😁7🫡4😍2
예상보다 높은 CPI로 시장이 추가에도 살짝 반응한 상황이군요 1) 12월10일 금리인상 가능성은 기존 84%→100%로 상승. 빅스텝도 10%로 첫등장. 2) 12월인상후 내년 1월28일 추가금리인상 가능성이 기존 19%→45%로 상승. 3) 이제 시선의 주인공은 다시 유가쪽으로. (추가 금리인상 분위기보다는 유가를 체킹하는게 현명하겠슴다. 트럼프가 키맨)
❤79😭43👍19🔥6✍5🤔3😍2
1) 요즘 텔레 밑에 광고 종종 붙잖아요? 몇 개 들어가보니 어떤건 해외에서 운영하는 리딩방 스타일이네요. 2) 주식 쪽 사기 안 당하는 방법인데 -과하게 자신을 포장하는 사람 -수익 인증만 있는 사람 -먼저 친절하게 다가오는 사람 -DM 요청하는 사람 피하기만해도 사기 당할일 없습니다. 3) 조급한 사람 맘 이용해서 돈을 받고, 책임감도 없는건 진짜 망해야 된다 생각. 4) 물론 좋은 유료방도 있죠. 내 시간을 아껴주는 유료방(요즘은 시간이 돈인 시대), 인사이트나 생각을 확장해주는 유료방(좋은 정보는 무료가 되면 안됨) 근데 답안을 찍어주며 인증 자랑만 있는 리딩방은 대다수 사기다 생각하면 되지요.
👍155❤60🥰7✍6
나이들수록 필요한 철없는 관계😉
😁181❤33👍18🐳7🥰7
이번주 다음주 주요 일정들이 많습니다. 체킹 꼭 해두시고요. ■ 이번주 주요 일정 1) 러시아,우크라이나 3차 평화 협상_아부다비 (11/10.화~11/11) 9개월만의 만남, 미국 중재 참여, 이틀간 진행 2) 미 CPI 소비자물가지수 (11/10.화.밤10시반) 3) 코어위브 실적발표 (11/11.수.06시) 수주잔고, 부채관리 4) 재정경제부, 비상경제장관회의 (11/11) 정부 증시대응 5) 중국 광군절 (11/11) 6) 빼빼로 데이 (11/11) 7) 네비우스 실적발표 (11/12.목.저녁9시경) 8) 미 PPI 생산자물가지수 (11/13.금) 9) 미국 비만학회 (11/14~11/17) 10) 트럼프, 이란 평화적 해결 모색_공격 가능성 낮다고 언급 ■ 다음주 주요 일정 1) 엔비디아 실적발표 (11/18.수.06…
❤80💯12✍10👍5💘5😇2😁1
코스피 정상화 1일차 코스닥 정상화 1일차 영차영차 이대로 반등해서 하락의견들 쏵 사라지면 좋겠음요. (그래도 아직은 좀 박스구간으로 생각해놔야죠)
❤133👍35🤣13😁8😇3
국제유가 하락흐름속에서 요즘 항공주들 좋은게 특징이네요. 정배열이 여러개. (이동네는 흐름 참고만 지금 추격 구간은 아니다생각)
❤64👍9🫡3😴2🤔1
*2027년 코스피 경로 전망(주황 점선) *27년 선호 업종은 헬스케어, 2차전지, 화장품, 인터넷, 호텔/레저, 유틸리티, 반도체입니다. *Top Picks로는 삼성바이오로직스, 셀트리온, SK바이오팜, 삼성SDI, LG에너지솔루션, 에이피알, 코스맥스, NAVER, 삼성에스디에스, 파라다이스, GS피앤엘, 대한항공, 한국전력, 삼성전자, SK하이닉스, SK스퀘어, DB하이텍을 선정했습니다. by 미래에셋증권 https://t.me/eqmirae
❤80🔥10🤔5👍4😁3✍1🙈1
코스닥은 638이 임기 바닥이었으면 하네요. 1년뒤에 오늘 차트 올리면서 저땐저랬었지 하고싶군여. 저런 위꼬리 차트가 잃는 사람 많고 최악입니다. (상승때 뒤에 불타기하다가 물리고, 그뒤에 또 물타기 들어가고)
❤142😭47😇10💘7🤣6👍1🙈1
오늘장세 이미지 요약 : 무기력 이제 분노,남탓에서 무기력,우울로 넘어가는 시기네요. 다 와가겠죠. 패닉만 없길 바라며, 그냥 수급이라도 정상화 되길 바랍니다. 너무 지친다 그죠.
😭266❤89😢30🤡10🥰7😍4😘3
엔비디아 이슈 방향성 요약해보면요, 1) 오늘 미장은 엔비디아 주가흐름이 핵심 (노이즈 회피하는 단기 물량이 어느정도 나오는지? 시간외 낙폭 회복하는거에 내일 반도체 방향성이 달렸다 생각) 2) 한국은 '중장기적 공급망 재편 반사이익'과 '단기적 악재'가 공존 (단기적으로는 엔비디아는 삼전하닉과 깐부사이라 분위기에 영향받음) 3) 확실한건 미국이 대중국 AI 반도체 통제의 고삐를 완전히 죄는 방향성으로 감 (민주당이 주도하는 의회는 1월에 출범하고 관련법안 통과 전망) 4) 트럼프(행정부)는 젠슨 황을 일단 감싸면서 "조사해 보겠다"는 정도로 5) 한국에 긍정은, 싱가포르 등 동남아 경유지가 의심받을 수록 미국과 동맹이면서 AI인프라 가진 한국이 부각됨 6) 공급망 재편으로 엔비디아 의존도 낮추려는 빅테크는 자체 칩(ASIC)이 늘…
❤113👍29✍10🤔9
Showing the 12 most recent of 612 posts we hold for @one_going. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @one_going as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 61 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“요약하는 고잉” (@one_going), 48,209 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/one_going.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.