인포마켓 infomarket pinned «CPO 광 렌즈, 누가 승자인가? - 인포마켓 강용운 대표 https://youtu.be/i0E60DEaYB8?si=HrFXh42iApCnNhhd»

Channel
인포마켓 infomarket
@infomarketopen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,544subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001245319176 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @infomarketopen |
| Description | 본 채널에서 언급하는 종목들은 매수/매도를 의미하는 것이 아닙니다. 본 채널에서 언급된 종목은 보유중이거나 아닐수도 있습니다. 또한 언제든지 사전 예고없이 매수/매도 할 수 있습니다. 투자에 따른 책임은 본인에게 있으며 본 채널의 게시물은 어떠한 경우에도 법적 잭임을 묻는 근거 자료로 사용될 수 없습니다. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/infomarketopen |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 8,544 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 8,540 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 8,540 | first reading |
Engagement
183 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.52%
- avg views ÷ 8,544 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 386
- 179 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.626%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 183
- of 183 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 148 of 179 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 183 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 69,134 |
| Reactions total | 384 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,200
- Videos
- ≈992
- Links
- ≈25,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5m 47s
- Average length
- 58s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
384 reactions across 146 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 269 | 70.1% | |
| 👍 | 96 | 25.0% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 2.60% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 1.56% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.521% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 148 of the 183 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 384reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 183 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
CPO 광 렌즈, 누가 승자인가? - 인포마켓 강용운 대표 https://youtu.be/i0E60DEaYB8?si=HrFXh42iApCnNhhd
❤2
니혼마이크로닉스 - 실적예상 및 배당예상 수정에 관한 안내 https://blog.naver.com/nlueoxy/224376822519
❤1
니혼마이크로닉스 - 2026년 12월기 제2분기(중간기) 결산단신 〔일본 회계기준〕(연결) https://blog.naver.com/nlueoxy/224376802509
❤1
홍하이 정밀공업(폭스콘), 2026년 2분기 재무 실적 발표 2026/08/12 https://blog.naver.com/nlueoxy/224376800032
❤1
노르웨이의 2조 3,000억 달러 규모 국부펀드가 수요일 1,840억 달러 이상의 사상 최대 상반기 수익을 기록했다고 발표했다. 또한, 약 12억 달러 가치로 평가되는 스페이스X 지분 0.05%를 보유하고 있다는 사실도 함께 공개했다.
❤1
중국 아이스페이스(iSpace), 재사용 로켓 개발 위한 시리즈 E 1차 투자 유치 앤드루 존스(Andrew Jones) 기자 | 2026년 8월 12일 헬싱키 — 중국의 재사용 발사체(RLV) 제조업체 아이스페이스(iSpace)가 대규모 D++ 라운드를 투자받은 지 불과 수개월 만에 시리즈 E의 1차 투자금을 확보했다. 투자 유치 작업은 현재도 계속 진행 중이다. https://spacenews.com/chinas-ispace-raises-first-batch-of-series-e-funding-for-reusable-rocketry/
❤1
나비타스(Navitas), 르네사스(Renesas) 제소... GaN 특허 침해로 CEO는 르네사스 전직 임원 출신 GaN/SiC 전력 반도체 전문 기업인 나비타스 세미컨덕터(Navitas Semiconductor)가 르네사스 일렉트로닉스(Renesas Electronics)를 특허 침해로 제소했다. 'SuperGaN'을 포함한 주요 GaN 제품군이 나비타스의 미국 특허 4건을 침해했다고 주장하고 있다. 나비타스의 현 CEO는 르네사스의 전력 사업을 총괄했던 이력을 가지고 있다. 르네사스 측은 "현재로서는 당사의 공식적인 입장은 없다"고 밝혔다. 2026년 08월 12일 18시 00분 공개 나비타스 세미컨덕터(이하 나비타스)는 2026년 8월 10일(미국 시간), 르네사스 일렉트로닉스(이하 르네사스)를 상대로 미국 텍사스주 동부지방법원에…
❤1
2026년 8월 12일 오전 4시 54분(GMT) 닛토보세키(Nitto Boseki, 3110) | 일본 2027년 3월기 1분기 실적 후속 점검 핵심 내용 저열팽창계수(저 CTE) 유리 생산능력 확대 의지 확인 핵심 요약 현재 가동을 준비 중인 대만 공장을 제외한 저 CTE 유리섬유사 생산능력 확대 계획에 대해서는 “아직 확정된 계획이 없다”고 답변했다. 다만 회사는 2028년 이후 예상되는 저 CTE 유리 수요 증가에 대응하고 시장점유율을 유지하기 위해 생산능력 확대를 검토하고 있다고 밝혔다. 실적설명회 질의응답 요약에서는 공급능력 확대 가능성이 높아지는 시점에 가격 인상을 검토할 방침이라고 설명했다. 생산능력 확대 방안으로는 신규 대형 용해로 건설과 기존 용해로의 전환을 검토하고 있다. 저유전 유리: NE의 견조한 수요가 지속…
👍5❤1
시스템LSI사업부, 올해 5월 ‘클로드 코드’ 도입… 반도체 설계·검증에 활용 한 달 이상 필요한 고객 맞춤형 SoC 검증 작업 이틀 만에 끝내 입사 2년 차, 한 달 걸리던 USB 모델 개발 하루 만에 완료 시스템LSI 6000명·퀄컴 5만2000명… “인력 격차 AI로 좁힌다” 오류 숨기고 설계 코드 수정 시도도… “작업 범위·결과 통제 과제” https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/366/0001185790
❤2👍2
📝. 일본 7월 공작기계 수주 YoY 50.4% 증가, 전월 52.7% 대비 성장세 둔화(로이터) JAPAN MACHINE TOOL ORDERS (Y/Y) JULY P50.4% (PREV 52.7%) 코멘트: 일본 공작기계 수주 증가율이 둔화됐지만 여전히 높은 성장세를 유지하고 있어, 글로벌 제조업 투자 사이클이 정점을 지나고 있을 가능성을 시사한다. #일본경제 #공작기계 #수주 #YoY #제조업 (Insight: @pcstfu | Source: @marketfeed | Disclaimer: 면책조항, 모든 메세지 확인 없고 착오가 중대하게 있을 수 있음. 모든 투자 책임은 독자에게 일체 귀속됨.)
❤1👍1
타이요유덴 - 2027년 3월기 제1분기 결산단신〔일본 회계기준〕(연결) https://blog.naver.com/nlueoxy/224369918375
👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 183 posts we hold for @infomarketopen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 736,692 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@HANAchina · 34,8295 posts[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 23,2194 posts[삼성 이영진] 글로벌 AI/SW
@Samsung_Global_AI_SW · 10,7164 posts키움증권 미국주식 톡톡
@kwusa · 36,8243 posts에테르의 일본&미국 리서치
@aetherjapanresearch · 33,8152 posts투자의 빅 픽처를 위한 퍼즐 한 조각
@investment_puzzle · 14,3472 posts키움증권 해외선물 톡톡
@kwtok · 9,1712 posts산업뉴스 채널_서울경제
@sedaily_industry_company · 3,8812 posts여의도스토리 Ver2.0
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,5722 posts반붐온? 방붐온?
@cpshelter · 5,3261 post딘스티커 Dean's Ticker
@d_ticker · 14,6671 post해외정보 분석
@pcstfu · 3,4951 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@infomarketopen named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“인포마켓 infomarket” (@infomarketopen), 8,544 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infomarketopen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.