https://n.news.naver.com/article/002/0002451500?cds=news_media_pc&type=breakingnews

Channel
Financial Magazine
@hanagae
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,665subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001207654950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hanagae |
| Description | 투자에 관한 모든 것(유통시장, 코인, 비상장, M&A, 투자조합 소개 등). 투자의견 공유채널. 판단은 각자가, 책임도 각자가. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hanagae |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 4,665 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 4,667 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 4,668 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 4,668 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.8%
- avg views ÷ 4,665 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 735
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.141%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (29 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,904 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,730
- Videos
- ≈30
- Links
- ≈7,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 87.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
>>메모리 가격 인상의 ‘천장’이 다가왔나? •번스타인은 2026년 3분기 DRAM과 NAND 계약가격의 상승폭이 모두 약 20%까지 축소될 것으로 예상. PC와 스마트폰 수요 부진, 그리고 장기계약 가격 상한이 가격 인상 여력을 압박하고 있음. •공급 부족은 2027년까지 이어질 것으로 예상되지만, 메모리 가격의 추가 상승 여력은 이미 제한적인 수준으로 향하고 있으며, 가격 인상 사이클이 막바지에 가까워지고 있을 가능성이 있음 >存储涨价的“天花板”快到了? https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3778963#from=ios
🤖 유니트리(Unitree), 상하이 STAR마켓 IPO 공모가 확정 · 공모가 150.8위안(약 $22.34), 시총 약 610억 위안(**$90.4억**) · 신주 4,045만주(지분 10%), 조달액 61억 위안 (약 $8.5억) · 청약 8/10 개시, 딥시크(DeepSeek)가 1.41억 위안 전략적 투자자로 참여 · '중국 1호 휴머노이드 상장사' 📌 참고로 유니트리 25년 매출은 17억 위안(4배 성장), 이 중 휴머노이드가 8.68억 위안으로 4족보행을 처음 추월. 다만 1Q26은 매출 +68.5%인 반면 조정순이익은 -52.6%(R&D·마케팅 비용 증가). 👉 미국 최초의 순수 휴머노이드 상장사가 될 Agility Robotics($CCXI)는 4분기 프리머니 약 $25억. 트위터상 그레이마켓은 유니트리 상장가의 4배 수…
챗GPT 무료 '무제한' 선언…오픈AI, 구독 전략 다시 짠다 오픈AI가 챗GPT 무료 이용자에게 최신 경량 모델 기반 텍스트 대화를 무제한 제공하고 유료 이용자에게는 답변의 추론 강도를 직접 조절하는 기능을 추가 무료 이용자 저변을 넓히는 동시에 유료 구독 가치를 사용량보다 답변 품질과 추론 제어에 두려는 전략 https://naver.me/G6RUAJOa
https://www.ebn.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=1719495
"애플-CXMT 메모리 반도체 공급협상 결렬…가격 조건 안 맞아" https://www.hankyung.com/article/202608069505i
«올 들어 금융 당국의 개입으로 유상증자 계획이 무기한 밀리거나 규모가 대폭 축소된 사례가 15건을 웃도는 것으로 나타났다. ... 자본시장에서는 신고에 따라 진행할 수 있는 유상증자가 투자자 보호라는 명분이 지나치게 강조되면서 사실상 허가제와 같이 운영되고 있다고 지적했다. 자본시장법상 유상증자는 신고서를 제출해 일정 기간이 지나면 자동으로 효력이 발생한다. 금감원은 법규에 따른 형식 등을 갖추지 못한 신고서에 제한적으로 정정을 요구해 효력을 정지시킬 수 있지만, 최근 정정 요구가 기업의 재무 안정성이나 소액주주 보호 등 비정량 요건을 중심으로 폭넓게 이뤄지는 게 현실이다. 즉, 기업의 유상증자 계획 발표로 주가 하락을 지나치게 의식한 나머지, 증자의 가능 여부가 당국의 판단에 좌우되는 허가제에 가까워진 것이다.» https://www.s…
관계부처 장관이 이렇게 목소리 내는건 적당히 하란 얘기겠지
김정관 “반도체 이익 나눠먹기 안돼… 주52시간 손봐야 中과 경쟁” https://www.sedaily.com/article/20076508 프리미엄 컨버전스 미디어, 시그널(Signal) 투자의 바른 길을 함께 합니다! https://signal.sedaily.com
👍1
단독 보도 - 트럼프 행정부가 중국 데이터 센터 장치에 대한 금지 초안을 작성하고 있다고 소식통이 전했다 트럼프 행정부는 잠재적인 데이터 도난 및 방해로부터 미국 인프라를 보호하기 위해 새로운 중국 데이터 센터 부품, 특히 광 트랜시버 품목에 초점을 두고 있다.
https://www.hankyung.com/article/2026080441145 '물량 공세' CXMT, 마이크론도 제친다…남은 건 HBM
✅ [단독] 흑자내는 코스닥 기업은 시총 200억 미달해도 상폐에서 제외 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/016/0002679214?rc=N&ntype=RANKING&sid=101
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @hanagae. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,010,588 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@kmj_retailcosmetics · 8,9872 postsBad Onion 나쁜양파
@Badonions · 3,5671 post(사)바이오헬스케어협회
@bioha1228 · 2,6551 post💻반도체 소부장💻[그로쓰리서치]
@growth_semi · 7,5481 post하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 34,8291 post한미약품 IR 공식 채널
@Hanmipharm_official · 7281 post[하나 이준호] AI/디지털자산/인터넷/게임
@internetgameLJH · 3,7781 postDS 양형모의 투자전략
@milperc · 5,7021 postPE, M&A, 대체투자, 거버넌스, 책 뉴스
@pef_news · 9591 post실시간 주식 뉴스
@realtime_stock_news · 37,3311 post[신한 리서치본부] 유틸리티/신에너지
@ShinhanUtilityNewEnergy · 4,4991 postYM리서치
@ym_research · 39,7201 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Financial Magazine” (@hanagae), 4,665 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hanagae.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.