https://n.news.naver.com/article/002/0002451500?cds=news_media_pc&type=breakingnews

Channel
Financial Magazine
@hanagae
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,642subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001207654950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hanagae |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hanagae |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 4,642 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 4,645 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 4,650 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 4,653 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 4,655 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 4,658 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 4,660 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 4,664 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 4,660 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 4,661 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 4,665 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 4,667 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 4,668 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 4,668 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 87.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
>>메모리 가격 인상의 ‘천장’이 다가왔나? •번스타인은 2026년 3분기 DRAM과 NAND 계약가격의 상승폭이 모두 약 20%까지 축소될 것으로 예상. PC와 스마트폰 수요 부진, 그리고 장기계약 가격 상한이 가격 인상 여력을 압박하고 있음. •공급 부족은 2027년까지 이어질 것으로 예상되지만, 메모리 가격의 추가 상승 여력은 이미 제한적인 수준으로 향하고 있으며, 가격 인상 사이클이 막바지에 가까워지고 있을 가능성이 있음 >存储涨价的“天花板”快到了? https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3778963#from=ios
🤖 유니트리(Unitree), 상하이 STAR마켓 IPO 공모가 확정 · 공모가 150.8위안(약 $22.34), 시총 약 610억 위안(**$90.4억**) · 신주 4,045만주(지분 10%), 조달액 61억 위안 (약 $8.5억) · 청약 8/10 개시, 딥시크(DeepSeek)가 1.41억 위안 전략적 투자자로 참여 · '중국 1호 휴머노이드 상장사' 📌 참고로 유니트리 25년 매출은 17억 위안(4배 성장), 이 중 휴머노이드가 8.68억 위안으로 4족보행을 처음 추월. 다만 1Q26은 매출 +68.5%인 반면 조정순이익은 -52.6%(R&D·마케팅 비용 증가). 👉 미국 최초의 순수 휴머노이드 상장사가 될 Agility Robotics($CCXI)는 4분기 프리머니 약 $25억. 트위터상 그레이마켓은 유니트리 상장가의 4배 수…
챗GPT 무료 '무제한' 선언…오픈AI, 구독 전략 다시 짠다 오픈AI가 챗GPT 무료 이용자에게 최신 경량 모델 기반 텍스트 대화를 무제한 제공하고 유료 이용자에게는 답변의 추론 강도를 직접 조절하는 기능을 추가 무료 이용자 저변을 넓히는 동시에 유료 구독 가치를 사용량보다 답변 품질과 추론 제어에 두려는 전략 https://naver.me/G6RUAJOa
https://www.ebn.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=1719495
"애플-CXMT 메모리 반도체 공급협상 결렬…가격 조건 안 맞아" https://www.hankyung.com/article/202608069505i
«올 들어 금융 당국의 개입으로 유상증자 계획이 무기한 밀리거나 규모가 대폭 축소된 사례가 15건을 웃도는 것으로 나타났다. ... 자본시장에서는 신고에 따라 진행할 수 있는 유상증자가 투자자 보호라는 명분이 지나치게 강조되면서 사실상 허가제와 같이 운영되고 있다고 지적했다. 자본시장법상 유상증자는 신고서를 제출해 일정 기간이 지나면 자동으로 효력이 발생한다. 금감원은 법규에 따른 형식 등을 갖추지 못한 신고서에 제한적으로 정정을 요구해 효력을 정지시킬 수 있지만, 최근 정정 요구가 기업의 재무 안정성이나 소액주주 보호 등 비정량 요건을 중심으로 폭넓게 이뤄지는 게 현실이다. 즉, 기업의 유상증자 계획 발표로 주가 하락을 지나치게 의식한 나머지, 증자의 가능 여부가 당국의 판단에 좌우되는 허가제에 가까워진 것이다.» https://www.s…
관계부처 장관이 이렇게 목소리 내는건 적당히 하란 얘기겠지
김정관 “반도체 이익 나눠먹기 안돼… 주52시간 손봐야 中과 경쟁” https://www.sedaily.com/article/20076508 프리미엄 컨버전스 미디어, 시그널(Signal) 투자의 바른 길을 함께 합니다! https://signal.sedaily.com
👍1
단독 보도 - 트럼프 행정부가 중국 데이터 센터 장치에 대한 금지 초안을 작성하고 있다고 소식통이 전했다 트럼프 행정부는 잠재적인 데이터 도난 및 방해로부터 미국 인프라를 보호하기 위해 새로운 중국 데이터 센터 부품, 특히 광 트랜시버 품목에 초점을 두고 있다.
https://www.hankyung.com/article/2026080441145 '물량 공세' CXMT, 마이크론도 제친다…남은 건 HBM
✅ [단독] 흑자내는 코스닥 기업은 시총 200억 미달해도 상폐에서 제외 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/016/0002679214?rc=N&ntype=RANKING&sid=101
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @hanagae. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@kmj_retailcosmetics · 9,7392 postsBad Onion 나쁜양파
@Badonions · 3,9151 post하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,3011 post한미약품 IR 공식 채널
@Hanmipharm_official · 8341 post[신한 리서치본부] 유틸리티/신재생
@ShinhanUtilityNewEnergy · 4,8521 post(사)바이오헬스케어협회
@bioha1228 · 2,7961 post💻반도체 소부장💻[그로쓰리서치]
@growth_semi · 8,0641 post[하나 이준호] AI/디지털자산/인터넷/게임
@internetgameLJH · 4,1131 postDS 양형모의 투자전략
@milperc · 6,4591 postPE, M&A, 대체투자, 거버넌스, 책 뉴스
@pef_news · 1,0421 post실시간 주식 뉴스
@realtime_stock_news · 37,2101 postYM리서치
@ym_research · 40,0711 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@realtime_stock_news · 37,210
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@growthresearch · 40,159
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@athletes_village · 21,621
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,411
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@huhpharm · 24,282
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@kwusa · 36,480
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@tazastock · 40,320
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@corevalue · 67,505
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,581
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@merITz_tech · 24,059
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
@TNBfolio · 24,657
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@bumgore · 35,352
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@FastStockNews · 128,921
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@easobi · 23,597
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
@yieldnspread · 22,018
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@EarlyStock1 · 24,432
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,509
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@bufkr · 22,185
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@HANAchina · 35,301
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@SmallCap · 23,176
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
@cahier_de_market · 22,505
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
@gaoshoukorea · 41,159
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@pharmbiohana · 29,812
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
@sunstudy1234 · 54,428
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Financial Magazine” (@hanagae), 4,642 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hanagae.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.