Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 인상주의 투자 인생 업그레이드노트

Channel

인상주의 투자 인생 업그레이드노트

@insangnism

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,233subscribers

+61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355606776
TypeChannel
Username@insangnism
Created21 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/insangnism

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@insangnism/29532 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC@Kyaooo/3477111 Nov 2026, 08:41 UTC1.004 minutes
@free_life59/540143 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC@insangnism/29392 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC1.00under a minute
@cahier_de_market/112765 Nov 2026, 09:33 UTC@insangnism/29433 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 10:08 UTC1.0035 minutes
@insangnism/29435 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 10:53 UTC@pengmeup/326955 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC1.002.8 hours
@insangnism/29437 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC@pengmeup/326965 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC1.001.8 hours
@insangnism/29479 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 04:33 UTC@nje2e/451518 Nov 2026, 05:10 UTC1.0037 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Kyaooo21 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 minutes@Kyaooo (12–9)
@free_life5918 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 minuteseven
@cahier_de_market24 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutes@cahier_de_market (21–3)
@bornlupin28 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutes@bornlupin (25–3)
@pengmeup11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0043 minutesthis entry (9–2)
@nje2e9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0037 minutesthis entry (5–4)
@redbirdstock9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008 minutes@redbirdstock (6–3)
@kimcharger5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0016 minutes@kimcharger (3–2)
@bbanjil15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.9 hoursthis entry (15–0)
@gatubang14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 minutesthis entry (8–6)
@jake8lee7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.5 hoursthis entry (4–3)
@insidertracking8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007 minutes@insidertracking (7–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 19 of the 19 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 274 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

11,17211,34911,260.56 August 2026 — 11,172 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,172 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,175 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,183 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,188 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,198 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,228 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,236 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,235 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,240 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,255 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,312 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,315 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,345 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,344 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,341 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,349 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,348 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,344 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,340 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,332 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,333 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,330 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,327 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,320 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,316 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,312 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,316 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,312 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,314 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,308 subscribers29 September 2026 — 11,282 subscribers5 October 2026 — 11,289 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,286 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,276 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,271 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,270 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,267 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,268 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,265 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,259 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,255 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,253 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,247 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,245 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,243 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,249 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,246 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,245 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,243 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,241 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,238 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,236 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,234 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,236 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,234 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,229 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,233 subscribers10 November 2026 — 11,236 subscribers13 November 2026 — 11,233 subscribers11,2336 August 202613 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 99 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,145–11,376 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 14:0111,233-3
10 Nov 2026, 23:3711,236+3
8 Nov 2026, 00:0611,233+4
6 Nov 2026, 21:2911,229-5
5 Nov 2026, 21:1611,234-2
4 Nov 2026, 21:0811,236+2
3 Nov 2026, 23:4911,234-2
2 Nov 2026, 21:0611,236-2
1 Nov 2026, 17:2911,238-3
31 Oct 2026, 15:4011,241-2
30 Oct 2026, 13:4911,243-2
28 Oct 2026, 12:0711,245-1
27 Oct 2026, 08:4411,246-3
26 Oct 2026, 09:1611,249+6
25 Oct 2026, 07:4711,243-2
24 Oct 2026, 09:2711,245-2
23 Oct 2026, 09:4811,247-6
22 Oct 2026, 10:3411,253-2
21 Oct 2026, 02:0511,255-4
19 Oct 2026, 22:3011,259first reading

Engagement

692 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.76%
avg views ÷ 11,233 subscribers
Avg views / post
984
205 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.385%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
205
of 692 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 81 of 205 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held692 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total201,770
Reactions total303
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,510
Videos
≈169
Links
≈18,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,797 reactions across 457 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,38276.9%
👍28816.0%
🙏452.50%
😁392.17%
👏201.11%
🐳90.501%
🥰70.39%
💯50.278%
👌20.111%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 476 of the 692 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,797 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 692 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 205 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC562 viewsread 14 November 2026

https://m.blog.naver.com/gmyhhj/224476939013

Signed 인상주의

14 Nov 2026, 06:26 UTC652 viewsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @haruhanj

https://n.news.naver.com/article/001/0016441578

Signed 인상주의

14 Nov 2026, 02:17 UTC766 viewsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @retail_analyst

잘 나가던 아식스도 꺾였네요 오늘 실적 발표하고 14% 급락 이제 스포츠화 시장도 진짜 군웅할거의 시대로...(물론 big2는 있지만) [대신증권 유통/의류 유정현] ★ ASICS (TYO: 7936) 3Q26 실적 요약 ▶️ 3Q26 실적 - Net Sales ¥270.7bn (YoY +21.8%, 환율 효과 제외 +14.3%) (vs.컨센서스 ¥284.09bn) - GPM 57.6% (YoY +1.5%p) - OP ¥55.1bn (YoY +18.4%, 환율 효과 제외 +11.5%) (vs.컨센서스 ¥60.42bn) - OPM 20.3% (YoY -0.6%p) - 지배주주 순이익 ¥32.6bn (YoY -0.4%) - EPS ¥46.03 (vs. 컨센서스 ¥52.12) - SportStyle과 Onitsuka Tiger가 매출 성…

Signed 인상주의

14 Nov 2026, 00:11 UTC851 viewsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @rafikiresearch

https://naver.me/GJZNK2WM AI에 의해 깨지는 시험은 그 시험으로 자격을 인정하던 직업이 더 이상 필요 없다는 의미 그 자격을 다른 방법으로 심사하고 일자리를 줘야 함 그럴 방법이 없다면 그 직업은 없어질 수밖에 없음

Signed 인상주의

13 Nov 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 14 November 2026

https://youtu.be/LFIQlH6vlUc?si=GlBK26AceoAPCDwd

Signed 인상주의

13 Nov 2026, 10:54 UTC925 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @maddingStockPhoto

시장은 안타깝게 금일 FTD가 나오지 못했습니다. 다음주 출현할수도 있고~ 모니터링이 필요한 시점입니다. 고무적인것은 신용잔고는 대폭감소하고 예탁금은 올랐군요. 최근 시장 하락으로 신용 비율을 맞추는것이 눈에 보입니다. 시장의 거래대금은 말랐고 센치는 매우 나쁩니다. 대응은 둘중 하나 입니다. FTD를 기다리며 구경하거나 바텀피싱을 통해 저가 매수 입니다. 주식시장은 성급한 사람의 돈을 인내심 있는 사람에게 옮겨주는 장치입니다.

❤1

Signed 인상주의

13 Nov 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @TNBfolioPhoto

코스닥 신용잔고

Signed 인상주의

13 Nov 2026, 09:16 UTC893 viewsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @TNBfolioPhoto

코스피 신용잔고

Signed 인상주의

13 Nov 2026, 07:11 UTC944 viewsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @bbong_ttaPhoto

신용잔고 신저가 갱신 & 예탁금 대반등

Signed 인상주의

13 Nov 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 14 November 2026

https://youtu.be/Ed4TF6FKIPA?si=efA_Phf4X9ryvg3I

Signed 인상주의

13 Nov 2026, 05:51 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 14 November 2026

https://youtu.be/EXMGnLdP29s?si=lXOFxmfdExHsUsXP

Signed 인상주의

13 Nov 2026, 04:44 UTC≈1,160 views0 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @moneybottlePhoto

조선비즈에서는 대만 자유시보를 인용해 엘리스황이 스파이라고 단정짓고 있지만 미국에서는 아직 의심하며 중립을 지키고 있음 만약 대만 자유시보가 얘기한게 맞다면, 반 데이터센터를 부추기는 미국 내 여론 또한 중국이 조작한 것으로 밝혀질것이고 민주당도 반대할 명분이 사라질것 같음 -FBI: 의심 유지, 방첩 수사 진행 중 -DNI(일부): 스파이 규정은 과장이라는 입장 -CIA: 감청 정보만으론 알고 흘렸다고 단정 못 한다는 입장 -트럼프: 확정 여부 모르겠다며 유보 -루비오(국무/NSC): 봄에 경고 메모, 5월 트럼프에게 구두 보고 -하임스(하원 정보위 민주당): 브리핑 후에도 모르겠다고 언급

Signed 인상주의

Showing the 12 most recent of 692 posts we hold for @insangnism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Republishes 131 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

루팡
@bornlupin · 49,268
33 posts
카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,110
28 posts
AWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널
@darthacking · 65,784
20 posts
미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 74,120
17 posts
작업중이양
@eyang92 · 7,913
16 posts
습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,295
12 posts
머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,777
12 posts
김치터미널
@KimchiTerminal · 6,742
11 posts
[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 24,857
11 posts
TNBfolio
@TNBfolio · 25,195
10 posts
KK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 21,183
10 posts
한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영
@G2strategy · 16,744
8 posts
프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,698
8 posts
하루한장의 지식노트
@haruhanj · 695
8 posts
Rafiki research
@rafikiresearch · 20,656
8 posts
재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,185
7 posts
하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,286
6 posts
[삼성 이영진] 글로벌 AI/SW
@Samsung_Global_AI_SW · 12,920
5 posts
[신한 리서치본부] 제약/바이오
@bio_shinhan · 21,335
5 posts
부의 나침반
@w_compas · 4,993
5 posts
조기주식회 공부방
@EarlyStock1 · 24,359
4 posts
ITM. IDEATOMONEY
@ToEllisIsland · 2,041
4 posts
그로쓰리서치(Growth Research) [독립리서치]
@growthresearch · 40,071
4 posts
인포마켓 infomarket
@infomarketopen · 9,751
4 posts
지식 책꽂이 (이대호 기자)
@knowledge_to_wealth · 14,424
4 posts
BacurasHouse
@BacurasHouse · 744
3 posts
캬오의 공부방
@Kyaooo · 17,482
3 posts
Sajah의 투자 노트
@SAJAnote · 1,604
3 posts
알테오젠 IR
@alteogenIR · 9,805
3 posts
돼지바
@bbong_tta · 12,904
3 posts
💯똥밭에 굴러도 주식판
@daegurr · 23,789
3 posts
꿈을 담는 단지
@dykim0210 · 3,912
3 posts
한경바이오인사이트
@hkbioinsight · 4,257
3 posts
주식줍는여인
@jingchopick · 1,117
3 posts
점프
@jump0000 · 3,384
3 posts
레드버드 기업분석
@redbirdstock · 10,745
3 posts
시황맨의 주식이야기
@shmstory · 39,621
3 posts
더파마 뉴스·인사이트| THE PHARMA
@BBAinsights · 1,136
2 posts
HS아카데미 대표 이효석
@HS_academy · 36,206
2 posts
투자콤
@comvestment · 7,357
2 posts
딘스티커 Dean's Ticker
@d_ticker · 16,286
2 posts
가투방(DCTG) 저장소
@gatubang · 14,537
2 posts
GIVME INVEST🤑
@givme23 · 3,369
2 posts
🧬바이오섹터 분석🧬 [그로쓰리서치]
@growthbio · 13,327
2 posts
하나증권 미국주식 강재구
@hana_us_stock · 11,869
2 posts
한화투자증권 리서치센터 투자전략팀
@hanwhastrategy · 11,597
2 posts
허혜민의 제약/바이오 소식통
@huhpharm · 24,264
2 posts
이지스스트레티지 리서치
@jeilstock · 26,232
2 posts

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

선진짱 주식공부방
@sunstudy1111 · 55,218
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,488
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
조기주식회 공부방
@EarlyStock1 · 24,359
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
김찰저의 관심과 생각 저장소
@kimcharger · 25,261
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,185
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
회색인간의 매크로 + 투자
@mistergray_11 · 19,794
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
스탁이지 - AI 투자 어시스턴트
@maddingStock · 20,900
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
이지스스트레티지 리서치
@jeilstock · 26,232
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
Rafiki research
@rafikiresearch · 20,656
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
서화백의 그림놀이 🚀
@easobi · 23,406
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
YM리서치
@ym_research · 39,801
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
그로쓰리서치(Growth Research) [독립리서치]
@growthresearch · 40,071
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
[하나증권 ETF] 박승진
@globaletfi · 20,610
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西
@YeouidoStory2 · 57,976
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
가치투자클럽
@corevalue · 67,105
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
오를주식 - 뉴스/경제/주식
@GoUpstock · 21,091
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
Yeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,450
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
키움증권 미국주식 톡톡
@kwusa · 36,188
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Buff
@bufkr · 21,563
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
⚡️번개맞은뉴스 - 상위2% 주식텔레그램 채널
@stock_messenger · 25,223
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실
@Jstockclass · 26,508
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
기술적 분석으로 보는 주식시장 (by 소라게아빠)
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,506
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
피카츄 아저씨⚡️
@pikachu_aje · 24,917
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
실시간 주식 뉴스
@realtime_stock_news · 36,956
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“인상주의 투자 인생 업그레이드노트” (@insangnism), 11,233 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insangnism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.