Channel
@marshallog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22,096subscribers
-69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001519612053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marshallog |
| Created | 19 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marshallog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 22,096 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 22,107 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 22,121 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 22,131 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 22,136 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 22,147 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:20 | 22,158 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 22,165 | first reading |
63 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 52 of 63 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 63 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 94,957 |
| Reactions total | 218 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
172 reactions across 37 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 100 | 58.1% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 13.4% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 9.30% | |
| 😭 | 10 | 5.81% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 4.65% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 4.65% | |
| 🙊 | 5 | 2.91% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
최근 비이상적으로 리베뉴가 높아진 빌더코드가 보여서 좀 찾아봤었는데 https://www.flowscan.xyz/builders/0xc742cf48524b07173dad1642c09c1dff504eb71a 미국 적폐냄새나는 entropy 얘네 일수도 얘네아니면 펌펀일듯 https://x.com/entropyIO
❤1
⚾️ 메이플 파이낸스는 에테나의 USDtb 채택 Source USDtb = GENIUS를 준수하는 에테나의 스테이블코인 메이플은 syrupUSDC와 syrupUSDT 안전성&유동성 위해 에테나의 USDtb를 예치 자금으로 채택 📔 주요 내용 · 에테나의 규제 친화형 스테이블코인 USDtb · 미국 국채나 현금성 자산 등 실물자산 기반 발행됨 · syrupUSDC, syrupUSDT의 담보 구성엔 약 4억 달러 규모 유동성 USD 자산 · 그러한 자산 안에 USDtb가 채택된 것 ✍️ USDtb가 활용될 수 있는 범위를 넓혀가기 시작했고, 위 사례처럼 다른 프로젝트에 스테이블코인 유동성 제공하는 인프라 역할로도 확장되고 있다는 흐름으로 알고 있으면 될 듯 에테나 화이트라벨 유동성 활용하는 최초의 사례라고 하니 더 많은 사례를 불러올 수 …
❤3
[속보] 미국 CPI: 전년 대비 +3.4% (예상치 +3.4%) 미국 근원 CPI: 전년 대비 +2.5% (예상치 +2.5%) ❓CPI: 소비자물가지수 (Consumer Price Index). 가계가 구매하는 상품·서비스 가격 변화 측정. 인플레이션 핵심 지표 — 연준 통화정책 결정 주요 입력 📰원문/번역 📅경제 캘린더 📲앱 다운로드
❤1
빗썸 매일 신저가 알림 계속오니까 드디어 하루 4회만 모아서 발송해주기로 변경했대요. 매일 부고소식을 듣는건 너무 힘든 일이긴 했어...
❤1
🚀 텔레그램 마약유통 20대 총책 구속 Source 「 텔레그램서 운반책 20명 고용해 전국 단위 점조직 유통망 운영, 가상화폐로 58억원 거래…합수본, 총책 등 일당 적발해 기소 」 「 A씨 일당의 가상화폐 지갑 추적 결과 이들은 최근 2년간 4천642회에 걸쳐 58억원 상당의 마약 대금을 거래한 것으로 파악됐다. 」 ✍ 마약 텔레그램 채널에 3천명이 넘게 있었다네요. '텔레그램', '가상자산' 이 두 놈 이미지는 날이 갈수록 떨어지는구나 #텔레그램
❤3
📱 주식에 발 들인 사람은 확실히 많아짐 평소에 나는 주식같은거 안해 하던 사람들도 이번만큼은 삼전하닉 사러 많이들 들어옴 각종 커뮤니티랑 SNS에 싱싱한 뉴비들이 많아 보는 맛이 있음 물론 뒤늦게 와서 쓴 맛 보고 역시나 나는 투자는 아니다 하고 떠나는 사람도 많겠지만 맛을 봐버렸거나 복수를 다짐하는 경우도 많지 않을까 이번 기회에 한국도 일찍이 투자 교육도 좀 하고 해서 투기의 민족 뭐 이런 오명도 좀 벗고 건강하게 투자하는 사람이 많아졌으면함 😊 #투자 #주식
❤4👍1
요즘 크라임 시즌이라고 크라임의 선조 TRB를 상장하는 모습 모든 숏을 산화시켰던 레전드 크라임 코인
❤1
[마켓 추가] 텔러(TRB) 원화 마켓 추가 https://feed.bithumb.com/notice/1654462
😊 전부 지쳐 떨어져나가니 오르기 시작하는건 국룰인가 코스피 반등다운 반등 나오는중
❤3🔥1
🟢 6,600.00 @KOSPI_Price
😊 이건 진짜 무슨 초식이지 BTC 마켓에 있던 고대코인 프로메테우스 원상
업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 프롬(PROM) KRW, USDT 마켓 디지털 자산 추가 2026-08-12 11:11:41
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @marshallog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 158,228 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“마샬 공유방 2.0” (@marshallog), 22,096 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marshallog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.