Channel
@marshallog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,798subscribers
-367 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001519612053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marshallog |
| Description | 리딩방 아닙니다. 경제, 금융, 크립토, 시사 등 다양한 분야의 정보를 공유하며 같이 공부하는 방입니다. 🙏 협업/광고 문의 @korea_duck |
| Created | 19 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marshallog |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 21,798 | -17 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 21,815 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 21,823 | -11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 21,834 | -17 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 21,851 | -22 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 21,873 | -17 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 21,890 | -14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 21,904 | -16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 21,920 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:14 | 21,917 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 21,936 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 21,941 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 21,943 | -12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 21,955 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 21,958 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 21,970 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 21,986 | -20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 22,006 | -12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 22,018 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 22,017 | first reading |
252 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 48 of 57 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 252 (4 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 92,330 |
| Reactions total | 253 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
842 reactions across 191 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 484 | 57.5% | |
| 👍 | 146 | 17.3% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 6.29% | |
| 😭 | 42 | 4.99% | |
| 🙊 | 39 | 4.63% | |
| 👏 | 30 | 3.56% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 2.85% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 1.19% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.594% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.475% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.356% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.238% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 206 of the 252 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 888 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 252 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 252 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
😆빗썸 앱토스 스테이킹 쌀먹하기 공지 원문 1. 빗썸, 앱토스 스테이킹 오픈 이벤트 중 2. 입금/매수 2개 이벤트 진행 중임 3. 1,000등까지 주고, 2만원 상당 코인 줌 4. 최수 참여수량이 15 APT라 쌀먹 도전 5. 재수 좋으면 최대 4만원 쌀먹 변창호님 채널에 올라와서 좀 살펴보니까 이거 은근히 가성비 좋을 수도 있을 것 같아서 찾아봤음. 이벤트 참여 가능한 최소 수량이 15 APT니까, 대략 원화로 17,000원인데 저번에 오브스 이벤트때 보니까 최소 수량(100 ORBS)보다 조금 더 넣었던 지인이 당첨됐었던 기억이 있어서 👀 그렇다고 최소 수량 15 APT로 맞추자니 동률이 많을 것 같아서 한 17~25 APT 사이로 매수/입금 이벤트 각각 1,000등에 들어서 쌀먹하는 것을 목표로 참여했음. (만약 둘다 되면 4만…
❤6👍2
😎 도플러 파이낸스 $XDP, 9월 28일 TGE Source XRP 생태계 프로젝트 Doppler Finance 크라켄, 쿠코인 9/28 TGE 확정 ❓ Doppler Finance란? · XRP 생태계에 자리잡은 대표적 XRPFi 프로젝트 · $XRP, $RLUSD 볼트로 이자 파밍처 제공 · 토큰화 시장 인프라로서도 확장 · SBI 리플 아시아와 MOU 체결 📔 $XDP 토크노믹스 · 총 공급량 100억 XDP · 생태계, 인센티브 : 43% · 팀 : 18% · 투자자 : 16% · 트레저리 : 14% · 유동성 공급 : 4% · 파트너 : 4% · 제네시스 에어드랍 : 1% (TGE 100%) ✍️ 한국인의 XRP 사랑으로 어떻게 파밍한 분들 두둑히 먹여줬으면 바이빗에서 캠페인도 했는데 어떻게 일단 바이빗까지 뚫어주면 안될까…
❤3👏2
⚾️ Ethena, 바이낸스와 파트너십 체결 Source 주식 영구 선물 베이시스 트레이드 첫 플랫폼으로 바이낸스 활용 bStocks를 토큰화 현물 담보 바이낸스는 ADL 우선순위 더 낮게 적용해줌 ✍️ 에테나의 탄생 시절부터 쭉 이어오던 베이시스 트레이딩 전략을 코인 쪽에선 줄여왔는데, 바이낸스 bStocks 통해 주식 거래 지원하고 선물 페어도 이젠 많아졌으니 주식 쪽에서 본격 써먹겠다는 소리 그리고 또 바낸월렛에서 Hold to Earn이라고 따로 예치나 락업 걸 필요 없이 보유만 하고 있어도 이자 챙겨주는걸 하고 있는데 U, USDS 다음으로 USDe가 3번 째로 활성화 되었다고도 하네요. 최대 4.75% APR 나온다고 함 #Ethena #KOL
❤3
비트겟 털린듯? 해커 : https://debank.com/profile/0x770b10b273fc44fe9197d6bf20f145c2e98463ee/history
❤3
$HYPE listed on Binance spot・
❤1
💰 비트코인 몇몇 휴먼 다이버전스 중첩으로 죽는중 1. 기영좌의 지속적 불장 선언 Link - "불장이 시작되었지만 누구도 관심이 없다" 2. 의문의 코인러의 페라리 쇼핑 Link - "페라리 계약 기다릴만한가요" *재미로만 보기 #BTC
❤4🔥3
오늘 시장 무드 물리면 답도 없는 코인들 위주로 펌핑되고 꼬라박음 추석 전 잡코 라스트 파티인가...
❤2
• 시신발견 : 8월 24일 • 트위터에 폭로글 올린날 : 8월 24일 • 도와달라고 메일 돌린날 : 8월 24일 • 증거 제출 예정일 : 8월 26일 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ
👀6🙏1
이전에 HackVC 관련 내부고발을 했던 Hsin-Ju가 숨진채 발견되었다는 뉴스가 떴네요.. 명복을 빕니다 관련 기사: https://hoodline.com/2026/09/las-vegas-woman-37-found-dead-near-i-15-off-ramp-in-mojave-desert/
😇 슬슬 다 나온 것 같아 살펴보는 KBW2026 스폰서 명단 스폰서 티어는 다이아, 골드, 실버, 브론즈, 코퍼 이 중에 아직 업비트 원화 없거나 TGE 안 한 것 📔 조건에 맞는 명단 · Stable (다이아) · tria (다이아) · GOAT NETWORK (다이아) · gnoland (실버) · based (브론즈) · MEMELAND (브론즈) · TALUS (브론즈) · METAPLEX (브론즈) · BELDEX (브론즈) · VERONA (브론즈) ✍ 물론 여기에 돈 내고 입성한다고 업비트 원화 상장 무조건 된다는 얘기는 아니지만... 역사적으로 봤을 때 가능성이 조금 높아지지 않을까 싶어서 써봄 *매수/매도 추천 아니며, 저는 위 명단의 코인 단 하나도 보유하고 있지 않습니다. #KBW2026
❤5👍1
프라이버시 가득 지캐시 모닝 또 강하게 올리면서 ATH 갱신
👍3
워뇨띠의 90일 서한 전문 암호화폐/ 나스닥/ 코스피 전망 포함 90일 서한 요약 : 강한 예상이익과 비싼 현재가치의 대결 올해 연말까지의 흐름 예상 1. 전망의 범위 이번 전망의 범위는 암호화폐, 나스닥, 코스피로 좁혀보았습니다. 암호화폐는 비트코인, 이더리움, 솔라나를 중심으로 다룰 것입니다. 나스닥과 코스피 관련 파생상품에서도 일정 수익을 올리긴 하였지만, 도합 20억원 수준이고, 거래를 시작한 지 이제 반년 정도 밖에 안 되었음을 양지해 주시길 바랍니다. 2. 암호화폐 전망 이 글에서 말하는 적정가는 시중에 알려진 여러 지표들을 종합해보고 제가 추정한 값입니다. 비트코인의 경우, 현재가 85k를 적정가로 보고 있습니다. 이더리움과 솔라나의 경우, 현재가는 적정가에 비해 10%정도 낮은 수준으로 보고 있습니다. …
👍8❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 252 posts we hold for @marshallog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“마샬 공유방 2.0” (@marshallog), 21,798 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marshallog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.