. https://youtu.be/yAhkg1F234w?si=IYOAMVGWOSD60wcR
👍2

Channel
@cyber_rangers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,013subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001759493167 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyber_rangers |
| Description | 시장에 알려진 적 없는 상장기업의 뒷이야기를 탐사하고, 역시 시장에 알려지지 않은 장기 성장성 종목을 육성 발굴하는 곳입니다. |
| Created | 24 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyber_rangers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 17,013 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 17,015 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 17,022 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 17,031 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 17,025 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 17,018 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 17,020 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 17,020 | first reading |
118 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (6 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 245,560 |
| Reactions total | 1,273 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,273 reactions across 118 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 416 | 32.7% | |
| ❤ | 303 | 23.8% | |
| 👏 | 288 | 22.6% | |
| 💯 | 120 | 9.43% | |
| 😍 | 50 | 3.93% | |
| 😁 | 45 | 3.53% | |
| 👌 | 30 | 2.36% | |
| 🤗 | 21 | 1.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,273reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
. https://youtu.be/yAhkg1F234w?si=IYOAMVGWOSD60wcR
👍2
https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25452791 경제 정책을 특정층의 희생을 삼아 정치적 지지의 수단으로 삼으려던 노무현, 문재인 정권의 똑같은 실패책 부작용이 반복되고 있는데, 지지했던 사람들은 불만 소리 하기 없기.
👍15👌3🤗3❤2
. ■ https://www.druckfin.com/en/articles/mp-materials-locks-in-nine-figure-gadolinium-deal-as-litinsky-warns-of-spreading-20260806?utm_source=perplexity ■ https://investors.mpmaterials.com/investor-news/news-details/2026/MP-Materials-Reports-Second-Quarter-2026-Results/default.aspx?utm_source=perplexity #MP머티리얼스
👏5👍1💯1
. ❖ MP Materials의 2분기 매출이 전년 대비 89% 증가한 1억850만 달러 ✅ "<NdPr 산화물> 및 금속 판매 증가와 가격 상승이 매출 증가를 견인" https://www.reuters.com/business/mp-materials-second-quarter-loss-shrinks-rising-sales-us-price-support-2026-08-06/?utm_source=perplexity ❖밤사이 뉴욕 증시의 <영구자석/희귀금속> 섹터 큰폭 상승과 최근 연속 상승이 나온 이유는 ➜ (1) 미국 정부의 핵심광물 자국 공급망 구축 정책에 대한 기대감, ➜(2) MP Materials의 강력한 Q2 실적과 가드올륨 국방 계약, ➜ (3) 주초 백악관 $20억 광업 투자 발표, ➜ (4) 중국의 수출통제 강화…
👍10😍2
http://www.hansbiz.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=856943
❤10
. ✅ 한 달간 큰 폭 상승을 이어온 미 증시 "영구자석" 섹터는 오늘도 <REalloys> 주도로 크게 상승 출발 #제이에스링크
👏7💯4❤2😍1
2026.08.14 15:37:22 기업명: 와이지-원(시가총액: 6,773억) A019210 보고서명: 반기보고서 (2026.06) 잠정실적 : N 매출액 : 2,133억(예상치 : -) 영업익 : 477억(예상치 : -) 순이익 : 304억(예상치 : -) **최근 실적 추이** (기간/ 매출/ 영업익/ 순익) 2026.2Q 2,133억/ 477억/ 304억 2026.1Q 2,078억/ 388억/ 257억 2025.4Q 1,782억/ 193억/ 78억 2025.3Q 1,688억/ 226억/ 108억 2025.2Q 1,507억/ 156억/ 24억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260814002362
👏8👍3💯3
. https://mkind.krx.co.kr/viewer?acptNo=20260814001152# #이노에이엑스
❤5👏2
■ 주가가 마이너스 일때 글을 올렸었는데, +4%까지 상승하고 있습니다. 워낙 IR이 보수적인 기업이라 스스로 추정 모델을 만들지 않으면 실적 추정이 쉽지 않지만, 주중반 2분기 실적에 대한 두려움이 있는 기관들이 물량을 던진 것으로 파악하고 있는데, 이런 부분은 사측이 조금 더 적극적인 소통과 오해없는 소통의 톤을 통해 시장에 확신을 줄 필요가 있어 보입니다. ■ 내년 상반기까지 실적 급증을 추세로 보고 있는데, 시장 반응이 매우 약합니다. 저는 현 시총 대비 3배는 올라야 된다고 보고 있습니다. 오늘 실적 공시를 기다려 봅니다. #와이지원
👍11❤2👏2👌1
. 2026.08.14 13:47:01 기업명: 토모큐브(시가총액: 5,134억) A475960 보고서명: 반기보고서 (2026.06) 잠정실적 : N 매출액 : 50억(예상치 : 44억, +12.8%) 영업익 : -6억(예상치 : -5억, -17.3%) 순이익 : -2억(예상치 : -5억, +59.4%) 최근 실적 추이 (기간/ 매출/ 영업익/ 순익) 2026.2Q 50억/ -6억/ -2억 2026.1Q 27억/ -19억/ -14억 2025.4Q 50억/ 4억/ 6억 2025.3Q 25억/ -18억/ -15억 2025.2Q 31억/ -11억/ -11억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260814001367 ✅ 비수기임에도 연초 약속한 실적을 지켜가며 매우 훌륭한 실적…
😍15❤1👍1🤗1
. https://www.thebell.co.kr/front/newsview.asp?click=F&key=202608141309018960105022
👏5👍2💯1😍1
안녕하세요, 올릭스 커뮤니케이션실입니다. 오늘 당사의 기존 투자기관들이 바라보는 올릭스의 중장기 성장 가능성에 대한 보도자료를 배포했습니다. 지난해 전환우선주(CPS) 투자에는 과거에도 당사에 투자한 이력이 있는 바이오 전문 투자기관들이 다수 다시 참여했으며, 미국 와이스 에셋 매니지먼트 역시 지난해 처음 당사에 투자한 데 이어 올해 약 1,000억 원 규모의 보통주 후속 투자를 진행했습니다. 이들 투자기관이 공통적으로 주목하고 있는 것은 단기적인 투자 회수보다 당사의 siRNA 기술 경쟁력과 OASIS 플랫폼의 확장성, 그리고 앞으로 이어질 주요 임상·사업 마일스톤을 통한 중장기 기업가치 성장 가능성입니다. 앞으로 하나씩 구체화될 당사의 성과를 지켜봐 주시기 바라며, 저희 올릭스는 계획된 사업과 연구개발을 차질 없이 추진해 기대에 보…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @cyber_rangers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 646,405 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“상장기업 수사대 ☎️” (@cyber_rangers), 17,013 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyber_rangers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.