행동은 습관이 되고, 습관은 가치가 된다.
-정직, 겸손, 상식, 철학, 습관, 태도.
본 채널의 게시물은 단순 의견 및 기록용도이고 매수-매도 등 투자권유를 의미하지 않습니다.
해당 게시물의 내용은 부정확할 수 있으며 매매에 따른 손실은 거래 당사자의 책임입니다.
해당 게시물의 내용은 어떤 경우에도 법적 근거로 사용될 수 없습니다.
Created
5 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 903 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net +888. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,265–28,450 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 07:59
28,295
-18
10 Nov 2026, 06:56
28,313
+12
8 Nov 2026, 16:56
28,301
+11
7 Nov 2026, 08:32
28,290
+9
6 Nov 2026, 08:09
28,281
+42
5 Nov 2026, 06:56
28,239
+17
4 Nov 2026, 06:49
28,222
+29
3 Nov 2026, 09:39
28,193
+20
2 Nov 2026, 06:18
28,173
+9
1 Nov 2026, 06:26
28,164
+14
31 Oct 2026, 09:59
28,150
+21
30 Oct 2026, 08:57
28,129
+6
29 Oct 2026, 07:56
28,123
+7
28 Oct 2026, 02:48
28,116
+16
27 Oct 2026, 02:47
28,100
+4
26 Oct 2026, 02:38
28,096
+6
25 Oct 2026, 01:10
28,090
+6
23 Oct 2026, 22:16
28,084
+7
23 Oct 2026, 00:44
28,077
+23
22 Oct 2026, 01:16
28,054
first reading
Engagement
2,595 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 28,295 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,070
1,029 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.495%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,029
of 2,595 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 771 of 1,029 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
2,595 (5 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
3,161,537
Reactions total
12,095
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈14,100
Videos
≈2,810
Links
≈54,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
50m 29s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 60 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,688 reactions across 745 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,932
42.2%
🤣
2,871
24.6%
😱
2,078
17.8%
😭
1,807
15.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 751 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,688 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 October 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @habit4117. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 October 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 489 of 1,029 posts held from the last 30 days (47.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
올 상반기 코스피 9000선 돌파와 함께 '1만피'(코스피 10000) 청사진을 그렸던 증권사들이 최근 증시 급락을 계기로 줄줄이 지수 전망치를 낮추면서 개인 투자자들의 원성이 커지고 있다.
주요 증권사들이 지수 하단이 뚫린 뒤에야 밴드를 수백 포인트씩 끌어내리며 사실상 '사후 중계'에 그쳤다는 지적이다. 시장 흐름을 선도하기는커녕 주가 등락을 뒤쫓아 목표가를 수정하는 행태가 되풀이되면서 증권사 리포트 전반에 대한 신뢰가 흔들리고 있다.
한 투자자는 "장밋빛 전망을 내놓으며 부추길 땐 언제고 이제 와서 전망치를 내리면 만스피는 어디 갔느냐"며 "증권사 다닌다고 근거 없는 예측을 내놓고 주가가 급락한 뒤에야 눈높이를 낮추는 건 너무 늦다"고 꼬집었다.
또 다른 투자자 역시 "목표주가도 주가 흐름을 보고 뒤늦게 끼워 맞추는 수준일 뿐 미래를…
BNK "코스피 적정 수준 6390"…13일 종가보다 1100p 높아
BNK투자증권이 10월 수출액을 바탕으로 코스피 적정 수준을 6390으로 예측했다. 지난 13일 종가인 5290.53보다 약 1100포인트 높다.
BNK투자증권은 코스피가 저평가 구간에 있다고 판단했다. 반도체에 이익이 집중된 데다 외국인 매도와 주식형 펀드 자금 유출이 이어져 당분간 박스권 흐름을 보일 것으로 전망했다.
https://naver.me/FfsLgMk5
‘AI 안경 의혹’ 세무사 수석 “말도 안 되는 얘기…찍는 것도 기술”
-한씨는 “모르는 부분도 많았다”며 “찍는 것도 기술이라고 생각한다”고 말했다. 모르는 문제는 넘겼다가 다시 돌아와 소거법으로 선택지를 줄이고 답을 골랐다고 했다.
https://naver.me/xiL9d1nz
우리는 너무 어려워 보이면 다른 것으로 넘어갑니다. 이보다 더 간단한 것이 있을까요?
적당한 가격의 훌륭한 기업이, 훌륭한 가격의 적당한 기업보다 낫습니다. 바보가 경영해도 되는 기업에 투자하십시오. 언젠가 바보가 경영하게 될 것이기 때문입니다.
잘못된 가격을 찾는 모험, 그것이 바로 투자입니다. 가격이 왜 잘못 책정되었는지 충분히 알려고 노력하는 것이 바로 가치투자입니다.
#찰리멍거
24시간 넘긴 MS365 장애… 공식 사과에도 ‘MS364’ 조롱 이어져
-MS "고객 신뢰 무겁게 받아들여" 공식 사과
https://biz.chosun.com/it-science/ict/2026/11/14/RC3BBLUYNFEXZNK6WGGQFIOGDQ/
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,595 posts we hold for @habit4117. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@habit4117 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 October 2026
Most recent edit
3 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 84 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
💯똥밭에 굴러도 주식판 @daegurr · 23,789 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
선수촌 @athletes_village · 22,145 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
그로쓰리서치(Growth Research) [독립리서치] @growthresearch · 40,071 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치 @FastStockNewsUSA · 41,039 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
간절한 투자스터디카페 @desperatestudycafe · 18,488 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
도PB의 생존투자 @survival_DoPB · 22,047 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
⚡️번개맞은뉴스 - 상위2% 주식텔레그램 채널 @stock_messenger · 25,223 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
주식 급등일보🚀급등테마·대장주 탐색기 | Korean Stocks @FastStockNews · 128,811 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
시황맨의 주식이야기 @shmstory · 39,621 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
타점 읽어주는 여자(타자) @tazastock · 40,978 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Yeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기 @Yeouido_Lab · 43,450 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西 @YeouidoStory2 · 57,976 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
회색인간의 매크로 + 투자 @mistergray_11 · 19,794 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
서화백의 그림놀이 🚀 @easobi · 23,406 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
가치투자클럽 @corevalue · 67,105 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
시장 이야기 by 제이슨 @bumgore · 35,362 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실 @Jstockclass · 26,508 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
실시간 주식 뉴스 @realtime_stock_news · 36,956 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
YIELD & SPREAD @yieldnspread · 22,083 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
재야의 고수들 @gaoshoukorea · 41,185 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
조기주식회 공부방 @EarlyStock1 · 24,359 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
HS아카데미 대표 이효석 @HS_academy · 36,206 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Buff @bufkr · 21,563 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
선진짱 주식공부방 @sunstudy1111 · 55,218 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘” (@habit4117), 28,295 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/habit4117.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
