Channel
@habit4117
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27,512subscribers
+105 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001600798466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @habit4117 |
| Description | 행동은 습관이 되고, 습관은 가치가 된다. -정직, 겸손, 상식, 철학, 습관, 태도. 본 채널의 게시물은 단순 의견 및 기록용도이고 매수-매도 등 투자권유를 의미하지 않습니다. 해당 게시물의 내용은 부정확할 수 있으며 매매에 따른 손실은 거래 당사자의 책임입니다. 해당 게시물의 내용은 어떤 경우에도 법적 근거로 사용될 수 없습니다. |
| Created | 5 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/habit4117 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 27,512 | +30 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 27,482 | +28 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 27,454 | +13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 27,441 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 27,435 | +12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 27,423 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 27,413 | +11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 27,402 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 27,407 | first reading |
240 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 201 of 240 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 240 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 941,225 |
| Reactions total | 3,735 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,484 reactions across 179 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,306 | 37.5% | |
| 🤣 | 1,301 | 37.3% | |
| 😱 | 601 | 17.3% | |
| 😭 | 276 | 7.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 201 of the 240 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,735reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 240 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @habit4117. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 240 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
구글, '한국어 유튜브 채널 449개' 폐쇄…"조직적 영향력 행사" -구글이 올해 2분기 정치 관련 한국어 콘텐츠를 올린 유튜브 채널 449개를 폐쇄한 것으로 나타났습니다. 한 분기에 이처럼 많은 한국어 채널이 폐쇄된 것은 이례적인데, 구글은 이들 채널을 ‘조직적 영향 공작’과 관련된 것으로 분류했습니다. https://share.google/VZLyRqcSg7Vv08BQC
중국 반도체 공세, 범용 칩 시장서 한국 가격 통제력 흔든다 https://www.g-enews.com/article/Global-Biz/2026/08/202608150909462487fbbec65dfb_1
신규 유튜버 수익 내기 어려워진다
😭2
삼성전자와 SK하이닉스의 평균 목표주가는 각각 50만5000원, 353만7500원으로 집계됐다.
[단독] “최태원 회장 결단 없으면 투쟁”…SK하이닉스 노조마저 거리로 나서나 SK하이닉스 노조가 성과급 일부를 주식으로 지급하고 일정 기간 매도를 제한하는 사측의 제안에 크게 반발하며 “최고 경영층인 최태원 회장의 직접적인 결단이 필요하다. 만약 사측에서 결단을 회피한다면 투쟁하겠다”는 입장을 내놨다. 투쟁 방식은 아직 공식적으로 언급하지 않았지만 삼성전자에 이어 SK하이닉스 노조까지 성과급을 이유로 거리로 나설 경우 세계 메모리 투톱이 장외투쟁을 벌이는 초유의 사태가 벌어질 것으로 보인다. https://naver.me/Gi0cqhQh
🤣20😭1
"美 10년물 5.2% 넘으면 경기·신용 리스크 동시 부각" https://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4430326
다음주 코스피 또 7천 볼까…반도체 회복·숏커버 가세 https://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4430328
👍4🤣3
트럼프 "호르무즈 해협, 조만간 미국 영토로 선언할 것" https://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4430315
😱22🤣6👍2
“파업하는데 관심 좀”… 카카오뱅크 노조, 교섭도 지지부진 진퇴양난 -한 조합원은 "인력이 절반 이상 빠져도 문제없이 굴러가는 회사에서 집단 연차와 같은 방식이 효과를 발휘할 수 있겠느냐. 싸움을 이길 수 없는 방식으로 치르는 것 같다"고 했다. https://biz.chosun.com/stock/finance/2026/08/15/CIOJ2NST4JDFDMDIYTMZFKK654/
🤣24
“청년에 빌라 떠넘기기” 비판에… 해명 나선 금융위 https://share.google/5rFBR9uFYzAKNlOwE
🤣6
청년 내집마련 LTV 80%까지 허용…단 4억 이하 비아파트 한정 https://share.google/JEExR48NUsfqVbX0z
😱11🤣6👍2
“한국 시장 돈 되네”… 글로벌 IB, 잇따라 영업기금·차입 한도 대폭 확충 -올해 골드만삭스·메릴린치·맥쿼리, 줄줄이 자본 확충 https://biz.chosun.com/stock/stock_general/2026/08/15/AOYBGQ5OMBE2RLURZSL2UE75LY/
😭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 240 posts we hold for @habit4117. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 19,810 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘” (@habit4117), 27,512 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/habit4117.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.