Channel
@G2strategy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
15,433subscribers
+130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001250493882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @EMchina @G2strategy |
| Created | 22 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| On Telegram | t.me/G2strategy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 15,433 | +10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 15,423 | +26 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 15,397 | +20 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 15,377 | +12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 15,365 | +24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 15,341 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 15,334 | +14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 15,320 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 15,312 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 15,308 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 15,303 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 15,303 | first reading |
212 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 212 (5 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 480,511 |
| Reactions total | 662 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
605 reactions across 190 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 560 | 92.6% | |
| 🎉 | 45 | 7.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 211 of the 212 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 662reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
중국, 태양광, 페로브스카이트 ========================= ~ According to their report, published last Wednesday by the journal Nature, the team also put the technology to the test outside the laboratory, installing a 1-megawatt perovskite system alongside a 3.5MW silicon facility at the same solar farm ~ The researchers monitored performance for three months and found that, for the same installed capacity, the perovskite system …
돈 풀기 22 ====================== ~ 이들 소식통은 이런 현금 지원 사격이 향후 몇 주 내 이뤄질 것이라고 전했다. 3개월 앞으로 다가온 선거에 대한 "첫번째 일제 투하(salvo)"라고 표현하기도 했다 ~ 한 소식통은 최종 금액은 아직 정해지지 않았다면서도 첫번째 분할 지원금으로 3천만 달러(약 426억원)를 거론했다 ~ 월스트리트저널(WSJ)은 지난달 16일 보도에서 지난 2024년 대선 이후 트럼프 관련 단체에 흘러간 기부금과 각종 후원금 모금액은 최소 7억8천195만 달러(약 1조1천100억원)라고 보도한 바 있다. 가장 큰 규모는 트럼프 대통령의 마가(MAGA·미국을 다시 위대하게) 진영 후보 지원 명목으로 설립된 슈퍼팩 '마가 주식회사'로 지난 5월 말 기준 자금 보유액은 3억8천200만 달러에 달한다 …
❤3
미국인 취미 관련 소비 비중은 코로나 시기 정점을 상회 ======================== ~ Hobby-related spending just hit a record share of U.S. goods consumption — nearly 5%, beating even the pandemic peak ~ Sales at sporting goods, hobby, musical instrument, and book stores jumped +11.3% year-over-year in May https://x.com/Hedgeye/status/2088579201683411138
❤3
~ 그는 마이크로소프트와 아마존, 구글, 오라클 등 주요 기업의 AI 관련 매출 상당 부분이 앤트로픽과 오픈AI에 의존하고 있다고 지적했습니다 ~ 아이스먼은 "이들 기업의 AI 매출 가운데 약 70%가 앤트로픽과 오픈AI에서 나온다"며 "결국 이 거대 기업들의 미래는 앤트로픽과 오픈AI가 성공할 것이라는 데 대한 베팅"이라고 설명했습니다 ~ 이는 오픈AI와 앤트로픽의 사업 성과가 단순히 두 회사의 기업가치뿐 아니라 AI 생태계 전반의 투자 성과와도 연결돼 있다는 의미로 풀이됩니다 https://n.news.naver.com/article/374/0000527570?sid=104
❤2
이란: "오만과 호르무즈 해협 통행 방안에 합의" • 이란 외무부: 미국 방해에도 이란-오만 회담 활발하게 추진. 양측은 호르무즈 해협 항로 통행 방안에 이미 합의 伊朗称已与阿曼就霍尔木兹海峡通行方案达成协议 当地时间8月15日，伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃表示，尽管美国从中阻挠，伊朗和阿曼之间的会谈仍在积极推进，双方已就霍尔木兹海峡航道通行方案达成协议。（央视） https://wallstreetcn.com/livenews/3149999?ivk=1#from=android
❤5
최적의 'AI 버블 거래': '오만'과 '편견' 동시 매수(BofA) • AI 버블 상황에서 최적의 전략은 ‘오만’(AI 테크)과 ‘편견’(시장이 외면한 자산) 동시 매수 및 AI 채권 매도 • Bull-Beae Indicator가 극단적인 구간에 있음에도 자금은 금/원자재로 이동. 개인 고객 주식 포지션은 최고치 경신 • 부채 압박 및 금리 리스크 직면했을 때 달러 & 채권 회피는 여전히 주요 로직 最优“AI泡沫交易”：同时做多“傲慢”与“偏见” 美银认为AI泡沫下最优策略是同时做多“傲慢”（AI科技）与“偏见”（被市场冷落的失意资产），并做空AI债券。尽管美银牛熊指标处于极端区间，但资金正流向黄金与大宗商品，私人客户股票仓位创新高。面对债务压力与收益率变量，规避美元与债券仍是主线。 https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3779514#…
❤3
굴스비: 지속적인 생산성 약화는 AI 서사 바꿀 것 • 충분히 고민할 시점, 상황 ======================= ~ Austan Goolsbee, President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, is sounding the alarm on a disconnect that could matter a lot more than the latest quarterly earnings from your favorite AI chipmaker. Recent productivity readings have come in weak, and if that trend sticks, Goolsbee says the entire AI-driven growth narrative could nee…
❤3
중국은 역외신탁 세금 규정 확정 추진 ======================= ~ Beijing is moving to clarify new tax rules on offshore trusts that have sowed confusion among wealthy Chinese citizens and their advisers https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/15/china-rich-tycoons-tax-overseas-investment-trust-insurance-capital-flows.html
❤3
레노버: "AI PC 중국 시장 판매량 50% 이상" • 레노버 AI PC 글로벌 시장 판매 전년동기대비 +86% 증가. 중국 시장 AI PC는 전체 노트북 판매량의 50%를 돌파 • 기술 측면에서는 단말 & 엣지 컴퓨팅 파워 전면 업그레이드. 토큰 생산 현지화 통해 개인정보 및 비용 모두 고려 • 생태계 측면에서 Skills 도입 가속화. 텐시AI L3급 작업 수행 능력 강화 联想集团刘军：AI PC国内市场销量占比过半 联想集团执行副总裁兼中国区总裁刘军表示，“一体多端”战略下，个人超级智能体加持终端，联想AI PC全球市场同比增86%，国内市场销量占笔记本电脑总销量的比例已突破50%。他透露，在技术侧，联想正全面升级端侧和边缘侧的算力，把Token生产更多留在本地，兼顾隐私与成本；在生态侧则加速引入Skills，增强天禧AI的L3级任务执行能力。 https://wal…
❤3
이란 외무장관: "이란은 미국과의 협상 재개 여부 결정하지 않음" • 현재 중재국인 카타르와 파키스탄 모두와 정보 교환 중. 그러나 이것이 협상 진행 중이라는 뜻은 아님. 현재 미국과의 협상 재개 여부 결정하지 않음 • 이란과 오만의 협상 진행 중. 선박 통행 위한 호르무즈해협 항로 확정과 관련. 호르무즈 해협 개방과는 전혀 다른 의제 • 이란은 미국이 특정 조건 준수하는 경우에만 호르무즈 해협 통행 재개할 것 伊外长：伊朗目前没有决定是否与美国重新开始谈判 当地时间8月14日，伊朗外长阿拉格齐在接受媒体采访时表示，目前调停方卡塔尔和巴基斯坦都在进行信息交流并与伊朗保持联系，但这并不意味着正在进行谈判。伊朗目前没有决定是否与美国重新开始谈判。阿拉格齐还表示，伊朗与阿曼的谈判正在进行，与确定霍尔木兹海峡的航线以便船舶通行有关，与霍尔木兹海峡的开放问题是两个完全不同的议题。阿拉…
❤4
미중은 안 친해집니다 • 그리고 앞으로 편가르기는 더 노골적으로 ======================= ~ 미국이 한국 등을 상대로 중국 주도의 인공지능(AI) 진영에 참전할 경우 자국이 이끄는 공급망에서는 배제하겠다는 경고장을 준비하고 있다는 외신 보도가 나왔다 ~ 미국 국무부가 작성한 서한 초안에는 “모든 곳에 속하겠다는 것은 어느 곳에도 속하지 않겠다는 것과 같다”며 “팍스 실리카 선언 서명은 단순한 회원 가입이 아닌 결속과 헌신을 의미한다”고 적혔다. 국무부는 서한에서 중국을 직접 명시하지는 않으면서도 “우리의 기대와 상충하는 이니셔티브(주도권)의 회원 자격을 동시에 유지할 수는 없다”고 강조했다 https://n.news.naver.com/article/011/0004652069?sid=104
❤3
~ 러트닉 장관은 현지 시간 13일 애플이 텍사스에 만든 첨단 제조센터를 방문한 뒤 인터뷰에서, 트럼프 행정부는 중국 반도체 구매에 "찬성하지 않는다"며 "다른 해결책이 있어야 한다"고 말했습니다. ~ 월스트리트저널은 러트닉 장관이 애플에 이 같은 메시지를 "분명하게 전했다"고 말했다고 보도했습니다 https://n.news.naver.com/article/214/0001518083?sid=104
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 212 posts we hold for @G2strategy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@G2strategy edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 25,702 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영” (@G2strategy), 15,433 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/G2strategy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.