Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

오를주식(GoUp)📈 - 뉴스/정보/주식/경제

@GoUpstock

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,845subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001678571507
TypeChannel
Username@GoUpstock
Description📈 돈이 되는 뉴스를 찾아드립니다. 오를 주식을 발굴하고 공유드립니다.🔥 멤버쉽 가입 & 비즈니스 문의 👉 https://t.me/QnA_inquiry 모든 정보는 투자 권유 목적이 아니며 해당 게시물의 내용은 부정확할 수 있습니다. 매매에 따른 손실은 거래 당사자의 책임입니다 해당 게시물의 내용은 어떤 경우에도 법적 근거로 사용될 수 없습니다.
Created4 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GoUpstock

Growth

20,81820,84620,8326 August 2026 — 20,822 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,823 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,818 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,823 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,827 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,821 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,846 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,845 subscribers20,8456 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,814–20,850 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:4520,845-1
11 Aug 2026, 15:2820,846+25
10 Aug 2026, 12:5620,821-6
9 Aug 2026, 12:5220,827+4
8 Aug 2026, 13:4820,823+5
7 Aug 2026, 16:0520,818-5
6 Aug 2026, 18:4520,823+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:5120,822first reading

Engagement

126 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.87%
avg views ÷ 20,845 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,060
126 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.209%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 126 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 75 of 126 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held126 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total259,120
Reactions total346
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16,300
Videos
112
Links
34,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

295 reactions across 57 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12040.7%
🤣5016.9%
🔥289.49%
👍248.14%
😱155.08%
😢134.41%
🌭103.39%
🙏93.05%
👏82.71%
😭51.69%
🤔41.36%
31.02%
🎉31.02%
🥰20.678%
🫡10.339%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 346reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC474 viewsread 12 August 2026

삼성·TSMC 손 뗀 구형 반도체, 공급난에 가격 줄인상 https://www.edaily.co.kr/News/Read?newsId=01082406645546992&mediaCodeNo=257&OutLnkChk=Y #DB하이텍

12 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC≈1,030 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

코스닥 승강제 최대 수혜, ‘미용·의료기기 5사’ 뜬다 https://www.viva100.com/article/20260812501017

2

12 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC923 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @JCxTB

머스크 "다음달 AI가 우주 매출 넘는다" 스페이스X 9% 급등 https://naver.me/F7FjTYWz 머스크가 AI 관련 하드웨어와 소프트웨어를 강조한 것은 스페이스X의 컴퓨팅 인프라 확대를 염두에 둔 것으로 해석된다. 시장에서는 스페이스X가 사실상 머스크의 AI 지주회사로, 향후 1년간 데이터센터 임대에서 대부분의 AI 매출이 나올 것으로 예상하고 있다. #데이터센터

12 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC≈1,120 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

모건스탠리 "LG전자, 이젠 피지컬AI 플랫폼 기업" https://naver.me/G1pVbd7I

3

12 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC985 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bio_shinhanPhoto

한올바이오파마 파트너사 이뮤노반트 +4.08% 상승해 52주 신고가 경신, 시가총액 12.5조원

12 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 12 August 2026

SK하이닉스, 인디애나팹 27일 착공식…최태원·젠슨 황 만나나 https://naver.me/5xgXXtqU

12 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC≈1,350 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

뉴욕 증시, 무난한 CPI에 보합...‘AI 인프라 호실적’ 반도체주 강세 https://naver.me/F7FjTjBm

2

12 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈2,040 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

美 7월 CPI 0.1%p↑,연율 3.4%로 예상치 부합 https://naver.me/539AAeu2

👏6

12 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC≈4,180 viewsread 12 August 2026

올릭스, CPS 물량 폭탄 우려에 주주 달래기··· "단기 대량 출회 가능성 낮아" https://www.newsway.co.kr/news/view?ud=2026081216071341900

12 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC≈2,570 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

전닉 바닥 잡는 와중 개별주 순환매도 계속 돌아주는 모습입니다. 오늘 CPI 발표가 있긴하지만 엄청 쇼크 나오지 않는 이상 저점을 계속 올려가며 순환매가 나오는만큼 투자에 우호적인 환경이라고 봅니다. 오늘 장 모두 고생 많으셨습니다!!

4👍1

12 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC≈2,590 viewsread 12 August 2026

“삼성전기 수혜받을까”…AI 천재 아셴브레너, 일본 MLCC 지분 대량 매입 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/009/0005720011?sid=101

Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @GoUpstock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 252,833 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“오를주식(GoUp)📈 - 뉴스/정보/주식/경제” (@GoUpstock), 20,845 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoUpstock.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.