Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 테크밸리 Insight

Channel

테크밸리 Insight

@triple_stock

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,400subscribers

+762 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001603630466
TypeChannel
Username@triple_stock
Description태크밸리 × 더블알파 × IR Technology × Investment × Company 본 채널에서 언급하는 종목들은 매수/매도를 의미하는 것이 아닙니다. 본 채널에서 언급된 종목은 보유 중이거나 아닐 수도 있습니다. 또한 언제든지 사전 예고없이 매수/매도할 수 있습니다. 투자에 따른 책임은 본인에게 있으며 본 채널의 게시물은 어떠한 경우에도 법적 책임을 묻는 근거 자료로 사용될 수 없습니다.
Created10 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/triple_stock

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@triple_stock/17400 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC@nje2e/450154 Nov 2026, 20:51 UTC1.005.8 hours
@triple_stock/17413 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 03:56 UTC@nje2e/451307 Nov 2026, 04:47 UTC1.0052 minutes
@triple_stock/17413 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 03:56 UTC@idea_memo/280037 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC1.004.3 hours
@insidertracking/680832 Nov 2026, 12:12 UTC@triple_stock/17363 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 13:14 UTC1.0062 minutes
@insidertracking/6887610 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC@triple_stock/17428 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC1.0040 minutes
@gatubang/536955 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC@triple_stock/16752 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC1.005.5 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@nje2e8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.6 hoursthis entry (6–2)
@cahier_de_market19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0019 minutes@cahier_de_market (18–1)
@jake8lee13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0050 minutes@jake8lee (7–6)
@idea_memo9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0052 minutesthis entry (7–2)
@FastStockNewsUSA11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0036 minutes@FastStockNewsUSA (10–1)
@insidertracking5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0040 minutes@insidertracking (5–0)
@kkkontemp10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007 minutes@kkkontemp (10–0)
@free_life5911 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0029 minutes@free_life59 (7–4)
@gatubang9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0040 minutesthis entry (5–4)
@HANAchina7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.1 hours@HANAchina (7–0)
@FastStockNews5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0039 minutes@FastStockNews (4–1)
@Yeouido_Lab5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0064 minutes@Yeouido_Lab (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 19 of the 19 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 181 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,63213,42113,026.57 August 2026 — 12,638 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,632 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,665 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,681 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,674 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,670 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,668 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,667 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,670 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,669 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,674 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,706 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,735 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,738 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,740 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,734 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,729 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,723 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,717 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,715 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,718 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,715 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,719 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,851 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,871 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,874 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,873 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,879 subscribers28 September 2026 — 12,956 subscribers5 October 2026 — 13,250 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,291 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,312 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,323 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,324 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,323 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,324 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,323 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,312 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,311 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,355 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,373 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,364 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,361 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,370 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,366 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,396 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,398 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,408 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,400 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,410 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,421 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,417 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,412 subscribers8 November 2026 — 13,409 subscribers10 November 2026 — 13,408 subscribers12 November 2026 — 13,400 subscribers13,4007 August 202612 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 97 days, net +762. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,514–13,539 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 03:4813,400-8
10 Nov 2026, 01:5013,408-1
8 Nov 2026, 17:5713,409-3
7 Nov 2026, 09:5413,412-5
6 Nov 2026, 07:4013,417-4
5 Nov 2026, 09:1113,421+11
4 Nov 2026, 05:3113,410+10
3 Nov 2026, 02:2713,400-8
2 Nov 2026, 04:5013,408+10
1 Nov 2026, 01:0813,398+2
31 Oct 2026, 00:2913,396+30
29 Oct 2026, 01:2713,366-4
26 Oct 2026, 23:1813,370+9
25 Oct 2026, 20:3513,361-3
24 Oct 2026, 22:5613,364-9
23 Oct 2026, 20:4613,373+18
22 Oct 2026, 17:3713,355+44
21 Oct 2026, 10:5813,311-1
20 Oct 2026, 10:5413,312-11
19 Oct 2026, 12:1713,323first reading

Engagement

283 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 13,400 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
98 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.644%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 283 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 95 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held283 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total243,026
Reactions total1,540
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 20:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,130
Videos
≈35
Links
≈9,460

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,872 reactions across 257 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤94432.9%
👍63722.2%
🔥2368.22%
🙏1756.09%
👎1555.40%
😭1555.40%
😱742.58%
👏732.54%
🤮662.30%
🤣602.09%
🖕592.05%
😁531.85%
🤔381.32%
👌311.08%
😢250.87%
😨90.313%
🤯90.313%
🎃80.279%
🐳70.244%
⚡60.209%
14 further kinds521.81%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 260 of the 283 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,872 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 283 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 98 posts held from the last 30 days (11.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 14:58 UTC662 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2I-kpUKN2z8&pp=iggCQAE%3D

😭2

12 Nov 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,860 views27 reactionsread 12 November 2026

●가장 약한 고리에서 다시 기회를 찾다 더블알파는 1기 출범부터 코어위브를 AI 인프라 산업의 핵심 기업으로 평가해 왔습니다. 그러나 3기 초반에는 코어위브를 포트폴리오에서 편출하게 되었습니다. AI 컴퓨팅 수요와 수주잔고는 여전히 견조했지만, 데이터센터 증설을 위한 막대한 선행투자와 자금조달 비용이 수익성을 압도하기 시작했기 때문입니다. 특히 CDS 프리미엄과 회사채 금리가 급등하면서 실적 성장보다 재무위험이 주가를 결정하는 국면에 진입했다고 판단했습니다. 현재 AI 산업은 일종의 캐즘을 통과하고 있다고 생각합니다. AI에 대한 수요는 견조하지만, 이를 충족하기 위한 투자 증가 속도와 실제 수익화 속도 사이에는 격차가 존재합니다. 그동안 시장은 AI 컴퓨팅 수요의 폭발적인 성장에 주목했지만, 이제는 그 수요를 얼마나 효율적으로 매출과 현…

❤19👍5👎1🔥1🤮1

12 Nov 2026, 01:36 UTC≈1,300 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026

* Dan Niles(며칠 전 엔비디아 저가매수했다고 언급했던 매니저) 젠슨 황이 엔비디아 CEO 자리에서 물러날 것 같습니다. 이르면 내일 아침일 수도 있고, 제 예상으로는 CFO가 임시 CEO를 맡을 가능성이 있습니다. 다만 엔비디아 주가는 늦어도 다음 주 실적 발표 직후에는 반도체지수 대비 상대주가 기준으로 바닥을 찍을 것으로 봅니다. 젠슨 황은 한 세대에 한 번 나올 만한 CEO였지만, 이미 준비 중인 제품들이 앞으로 약 2년은 회사를 지탱할 수 있다고 봅니다. 그에게 직접 보고하는 경영진도 인재층이 두텁습니다. 제가 떠올리는 사례는 스티브 잡스입니다. 잡스는 2011년 1월 병가에 들어갔고 안타깝게도 그해 10월 세상을 떠났습니다. 그런데 애플 주가는 2011년과 2012년에 각각 26%씩 올랐습니다. 같은 기간 S&P 500은…

😱5❤2👎1

11 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC≈2,310 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

●비AI 대비 AI 상대강도

❤4👎1🔥1😱1

11 Nov 2026, 16:31 UTC≈9,650 views6 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

●코어위브, 가중평균 차입금리 추이

❤4👎1🥰1

11 Nov 2026, 16:26 UTC≈2,370 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

●코어위브, 계약 전력과 가동 전력 2026년 말 가동 전력 목표는 1.85GW 초과

❤2👎1🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,770 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🔹CoreWeave CEO, 사전 주식 매도 계획 취소 » 마이클 인트레이터 CoreWeave CEO는 사전에 설정한 주식 매도 계획(10b5-1)을 취소했다고 언급. 주가에 의미 있는 변화가 나타나기 전까지 매도 계획을 보류할 것이며, 추가 매도가 있더라도 통상적인 세금 관련 거래에 한정될 것이라고 설명 » 인트레이터 CEO는 2025년 11월 발표한 매도 계획에 따라 지금까지 총 826만 주를 주당 평균 96.14달러에 매도. 총 매도 금액은 약 7억 9,420만 달러. 그동안 주가가 부진한 흐름을 보이는 가운데 CEO와 공동 창업자들의 주식 매도에 대한 비판이 제기되어 온 상황 » 인트레이터 CEO는 미국 중간선거 이후 데이터센터 규제 강화 우려에도 회사의 사업에 미치는 영향은 없을 것으로 예상. 데이터센터를 책임 있게 건설하는 것…

❤4🎃2👍2🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC979 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

앤스로픽 IPO에 공모 물량의 몇 배에 달하는 청약 수요가 몰린 것으로 전해졌다.

👍7🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,460 views6 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

미국 레딧 관심도 엔비디아 → 코어위브

👍5🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 11:37 UTC≈1,460 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026

[한국투자증권 반도체/소부장 고영민, 김연준] 반도체 - [코어위브 FY3Q26] 두 가지 우려 해소 ☑️ 시장 우려에 정면으로 해소할 수 있는 내용 ☑️ 적어도 돈과 규제로 인한 AI 투자 축소는 제한적 ☑️ 연초 랠리를 감안, 11월 반전의 시작점 ▶️ Coreweave 실적발표 주요 시사점 - 컨센서스와 가이던스 모두 상회하는 호실적 - 주요 데이터포인트(매출액, 영업이익, CapEx, 연말 ARR, 계약전력 규모 등) 상향 제시 ① AI 투자 지속 우려? → 뉴노말로 가는 중 - 27년 매진, 28년까지 시장에 내놓은 물량 전량 판매(강한 수요) - 강한 수요에 맞게 선수금 기반 조달(선수금 조건 가격 인하) 등을 기반으로 채권을 통한 조달 필요성은 낮다는 점 언급 → 한투 의견) 자금조달 관련 우려는 앞으로도 지속될 가능성. …

❤3🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 04:15 UTC≈1,360 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026

미장 오버나이트 코어위브 +16.5% 네비우스 +11.4% 블룸에너지 +6% 마이크론 +4.7% AMD +4.4% 브로드컴 +3.2% 엔비디아 +2.4%

👍5❤4😁1

11 Nov 2026, 03:45 UTC≈3,330 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026

* 이게 미장 반등의 트리거로 보고 있습니다.

👍10❤2🔥1🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 283 posts we hold for @triple_stock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

KK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 21,169
14 posts
카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,110
11 posts
하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,273
10 posts
한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영
@G2strategy · 16,744
7 posts
미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 74,120
6 posts
루팡
@bornlupin · 49,268
5 posts
TIME ACT!VE ETF
@activeetf · 9,939
4 posts
YM리서치
@ym_research · 39,821
4 posts
급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치
@FastStockNewsUSA · 41,039
3 posts
[삼성 이영진] 글로벌 AI/SW
@Samsung_Global_AI_SW · 12,920
3 posts
Rafiki research
@rafikiresearch · 20,656
3 posts
딘스티커 Dean's Ticker
@d_ticker · 16,286
2 posts
잠실개미&10X’s N.E.R.D.S
@jake8lee · 17,214
2 posts
이지스스트레티지 리서치
@jeilstock · 26,239
2 posts
점프
@jump0000 · 3,384
2 posts
키움증권 미국주식 톡톡
@kwusa · 36,188
2 posts
[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 24,857
2 posts
엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실
@Jstockclass · 26,508
1 post
Sajah의 투자 노트
@SAJAnote · 1,603
1 post
ITM. IDEATOMONEY
@ToEllisIsland · 2,041
1 post
[한투증권 🚘 자동차 / 김창호 & 전유나]
@autoteamkorea · 4,114
1 post
벨루가의 주식 헤엄치기
@beluga_investment · 7,623
1 post
시장 이야기 by 제이슨
@bumgore · 35,362
1 post
재테크야간자율학습🌗
@capitalmosquito · 4,252
1 post
[메리츠 중국 최설화]
@china_kis · 10,673
1 post
투자콤
@comvestment · 7,357
1 post
반붐온? 방붐온?
@cpshelter · 5,377
1 post
AWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널
@darthacking · 65,571
1 post
DS Tech 이수림
@dssemicon · 5,763
1 post
꿈을 담는 단지
@dykim0210 · 3,912
1 post
이그전 (이은택의 그림 전략)
@egzion · 22,870
1 post
프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,707
1 post
재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,185
1 post
가투방(DCTG) 저장소
@gatubang · 14,537
1 post
하나증권 미국주식 강재구
@hana_us_stock · 11,869
1 post
실시간 역외 첩보망 PRO
@hyperspect · 4,813
1 post
키움증권 인터넷게임 김진구
@jkimsw · 1,962
1 post
[한투증권 로보틱스 | 최건]
@kis_robotics · 4,447
1 post
投資, 아레테
@mstaryun · 18,775
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 24,857
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
이지스스트레티지 리서치
@jeilstock · 26,239
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
그로쓰리서치(Growth Research) [독립리서치]
@growthresearch · 40,090
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,273
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
선진짱 주식공부방
@sunstudy1111 · 55,218
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
도PB의 생존투자
@survival_DoPB · 22,047
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,185
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
TNBfolio
@TNBfolio · 25,163
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
시황맨의 주식이야기
@shmstory · 39,582
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
서화백의 그림놀이 🚀
@easobi · 23,419
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
루팡
@bornlupin · 49,268
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
[하나증권 ETF] 박승진
@globaletfi · 20,610
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
KK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 21,169
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 September 2026
⚡️번개맞은뉴스 - 상위2% 주식텔레그램 채널
@stock_messenger · 25,223
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실
@Jstockclass · 26,508
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
실시간 주식 뉴스
@realtime_stock_news · 36,958
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
스탁이지 - AI 투자 어시스턴트
@maddingStock · 20,900
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
오를주식 - 뉴스/경제/주식
@GoUpstock · 21,091
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
선수촌
@athletes_village · 22,145
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
조기주식회 공부방
@EarlyStock1 · 24,363
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
키움증권 미국주식 톡톡
@kwusa · 36,188
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Buff
@bufkr · 21,563
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
피카츄 아저씨⚡️
@pikachu_aje · 24,917
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀
@SmallCap · 22,982
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“테크밸리 Insight” (@triple_stock), 13,400 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/triple_stock.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.