https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2I-kpUKN2z8&pp=iggCQAE%3D
😭2

Channel
@triple_stock
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,400subscribers
+762 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001603630466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @triple_stock |
| Description | 태크밸리 × 더블알파 × IR Technology × Investment × Company 본 채널에서 언급하는 종목들은 매수/매도를 의미하는 것이 아닙니다. 본 채널에서 언급된 종목은 보유 중이거나 아닐 수도 있습니다. 또한 언제든지 사전 예고없이 매수/매도할 수 있습니다. 투자에 따른 책임은 본인에게 있으며 본 채널의 게시물은 어떠한 경우에도 법적 책임을 묻는 근거 자료로 사용될 수 없습니다. |
| Created | 10 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/triple_stock |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @triple_stock/17400 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC | @nje2e/450154 Nov 2026, 20:51 UTC | 1.00 | 5.8 hours |
| @triple_stock/17413 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 03:56 UTC | @nje2e/451307 Nov 2026, 04:47 UTC | 1.00 | 52 minutes |
| @triple_stock/17413 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 03:56 UTC | @idea_memo/280037 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC | 1.00 | 4.3 hours |
| @insidertracking/680832 Nov 2026, 12:12 UTC | @triple_stock/17363 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 13:14 UTC | 1.00 | 62 minutes |
| @insidertracking/6887610 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC | @triple_stock/17428 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC | 1.00 | 40 minutes |
| @gatubang/536955 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC | @triple_stock/16752 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC | 1.00 | 5.5 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @nje2e | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.6 hours | this entry (6–2) |
| @cahier_de_market | 19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 19 minutes | @cahier_de_market (18–1) |
| @jake8lee | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 50 minutes | @jake8lee (7–6) |
| @idea_memo | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 52 minutes | this entry (7–2) |
| @FastStockNewsUSA | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 36 minutes | @FastStockNewsUSA (10–1) |
| @insidertracking | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 40 minutes | @insidertracking (5–0) |
| @kkkontemp | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7 minutes | @kkkontemp (10–0) |
| @free_life59 | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 29 minutes | @free_life59 (7–4) |
| @gatubang | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 40 minutes | this entry (5–4) |
| @HANAchina | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3.1 hours | @HANAchina (7–0) |
| @FastStockNews | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 39 minutes | @FastStockNews (4–1) |
| @Yeouido_Lab | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 64 minutes | @Yeouido_Lab (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 19 of the 19 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 181 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 03:48 | 13,400 | -8 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 01:50 | 13,408 | -1 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:57 | 13,409 | -3 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:54 | 13,412 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:40 | 13,417 | -4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:11 | 13,421 | +11 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:31 | 13,410 | +10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:27 | 13,400 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:50 | 13,408 | +10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:08 | 13,398 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:29 | 13,396 | +30 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 13,366 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 13,370 | +9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:35 | 13,361 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 13,364 | -9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 13,373 | +18 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:37 | 13,355 | +44 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:58 | 13,311 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:54 | 13,312 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 13,323 | first reading |
283 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 95 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 283 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 243,026 |
| Reactions total | 1,540 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 20:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
2,872 reactions across 257 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 944 | 32.9% | |
| 👍 | 637 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 236 | 8.22% | |
| 🙏 | 175 | 6.09% | |
| 👎 | 155 | 5.40% | |
| 😭 | 155 | 5.40% | |
| 😱 | 74 | 2.58% | |
| 👏 | 73 | 2.54% | |
| 🤮 | 66 | 2.30% | |
| 🤣 | 60 | 2.09% | |
| 🖕 | 59 | 2.05% | |
| 😁 | 53 | 1.85% | |
| 🤔 | 38 | 1.32% | |
| 👌 | 31 | 1.08% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 0.87% | |
| 😨 | 9 | 0.313% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 0.313% | |
| 🎃 | 8 | 0.279% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 0.244% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 0.209% | |
| 14 further kinds | 52 | 1.81% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 260 of the 283 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,872 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 283 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 98 posts held from the last 30 days (11.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2I-kpUKN2z8&pp=iggCQAE%3D
😭2
●가장 약한 고리에서 다시 기회를 찾다 더블알파는 1기 출범부터 코어위브를 AI 인프라 산업의 핵심 기업으로 평가해 왔습니다. 그러나 3기 초반에는 코어위브를 포트폴리오에서 편출하게 되었습니다. AI 컴퓨팅 수요와 수주잔고는 여전히 견조했지만, 데이터센터 증설을 위한 막대한 선행투자와 자금조달 비용이 수익성을 압도하기 시작했기 때문입니다. 특히 CDS 프리미엄과 회사채 금리가 급등하면서 실적 성장보다 재무위험이 주가를 결정하는 국면에 진입했다고 판단했습니다. 현재 AI 산업은 일종의 캐즘을 통과하고 있다고 생각합니다. AI에 대한 수요는 견조하지만, 이를 충족하기 위한 투자 증가 속도와 실제 수익화 속도 사이에는 격차가 존재합니다. 그동안 시장은 AI 컴퓨팅 수요의 폭발적인 성장에 주목했지만, 이제는 그 수요를 얼마나 효율적으로 매출과 현…
❤19👍5👎1🔥1🤮1
* Dan Niles(며칠 전 엔비디아 저가매수했다고 언급했던 매니저) 젠슨 황이 엔비디아 CEO 자리에서 물러날 것 같습니다. 이르면 내일 아침일 수도 있고, 제 예상으로는 CFO가 임시 CEO를 맡을 가능성이 있습니다. 다만 엔비디아 주가는 늦어도 다음 주 실적 발표 직후에는 반도체지수 대비 상대주가 기준으로 바닥을 찍을 것으로 봅니다. 젠슨 황은 한 세대에 한 번 나올 만한 CEO였지만, 이미 준비 중인 제품들이 앞으로 약 2년은 회사를 지탱할 수 있다고 봅니다. 그에게 직접 보고하는 경영진도 인재층이 두텁습니다. 제가 떠올리는 사례는 스티브 잡스입니다. 잡스는 2011년 1월 병가에 들어갔고 안타깝게도 그해 10월 세상을 떠났습니다. 그런데 애플 주가는 2011년과 2012년에 각각 26%씩 올랐습니다. 같은 기간 S&P 500은…
😱5❤2👎1
●비AI 대비 AI 상대강도
❤4👎1🔥1😱1
●코어위브, 가중평균 차입금리 추이
❤4👎1🥰1
●코어위브, 계약 전력과 가동 전력 2026년 말 가동 전력 목표는 1.85GW 초과
❤2👎1🔥1
🔹CoreWeave CEO, 사전 주식 매도 계획 취소 » 마이클 인트레이터 CoreWeave CEO는 사전에 설정한 주식 매도 계획(10b5-1)을 취소했다고 언급. 주가에 의미 있는 변화가 나타나기 전까지 매도 계획을 보류할 것이며, 추가 매도가 있더라도 통상적인 세금 관련 거래에 한정될 것이라고 설명 » 인트레이터 CEO는 2025년 11월 발표한 매도 계획에 따라 지금까지 총 826만 주를 주당 평균 96.14달러에 매도. 총 매도 금액은 약 7억 9,420만 달러. 그동안 주가가 부진한 흐름을 보이는 가운데 CEO와 공동 창업자들의 주식 매도에 대한 비판이 제기되어 온 상황 » 인트레이터 CEO는 미국 중간선거 이후 데이터센터 규제 강화 우려에도 회사의 사업에 미치는 영향은 없을 것으로 예상. 데이터센터를 책임 있게 건설하는 것…
❤4🎃2👍2🔥1
앤스로픽 IPO에 공모 물량의 몇 배에 달하는 청약 수요가 몰린 것으로 전해졌다.
👍7🔥1
미국 레딧 관심도 엔비디아 → 코어위브
👍5🔥1
[한국투자증권 반도체/소부장 고영민, 김연준] 반도체 - [코어위브 FY3Q26] 두 가지 우려 해소 ☑️ 시장 우려에 정면으로 해소할 수 있는 내용 ☑️ 적어도 돈과 규제로 인한 AI 투자 축소는 제한적 ☑️ 연초 랠리를 감안, 11월 반전의 시작점 ▶️ Coreweave 실적발표 주요 시사점 - 컨센서스와 가이던스 모두 상회하는 호실적 - 주요 데이터포인트(매출액, 영업이익, CapEx, 연말 ARR, 계약전력 규모 등) 상향 제시 ① AI 투자 지속 우려? → 뉴노말로 가는 중 - 27년 매진, 28년까지 시장에 내놓은 물량 전량 판매(강한 수요) - 강한 수요에 맞게 선수금 기반 조달(선수금 조건 가격 인하) 등을 기반으로 채권을 통한 조달 필요성은 낮다는 점 언급 → 한투 의견) 자금조달 관련 우려는 앞으로도 지속될 가능성. …
❤3🔥1
미장 오버나이트 코어위브 +16.5% 네비우스 +11.4% 블룸에너지 +6% 마이크론 +4.7% AMD +4.4% 브로드컴 +3.2% 엔비디아 +2.4%
👍5❤4😁1
* 이게 미장 반등의 트리거로 보고 있습니다.
👍10❤2🔥1🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 283 posts we hold for @triple_stock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@triple_stock named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“테크밸리 Insight” (@triple_stock), 13,400 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/triple_stock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.