Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

키움증권 미국주식 톡톡

@kwusa

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

36,824subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001191697168
TypeChannel
Username@kwusa
Description키움 미국주식 관련 주요 소식 및 공표된 리서치 자료 공유
Created19 September 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kwusa

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@KiwoomResearch/236925 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC@kwusa/60055 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 22:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@kwusa/60056 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC@KiwoomResearch/236965 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@kwusa/60059 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC@KiwoomResearch/237005 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@kwusa/60119 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC@KiwoomResearch/237197 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@kwusa/60122 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC@KiwoomResearch/237217 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@KiwoomResearch5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 39 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @KiwoomResearch. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

36,82436,85236,8386 August 2026 — 36,852 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,852 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,845 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,848 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,847 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,843 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,832 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,824 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,820–36,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:3636,824-8
11 Aug 2026, 17:2536,832-11
10 Aug 2026, 19:4536,843-4
9 Aug 2026, 21:3136,847-1
9 Aug 2026, 00:5136,848+3
7 Aug 2026, 23:3836,845-7
6 Aug 2026, 02:4536,852no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:3836,852first reading

Engagement

96 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.07%
avg views ÷ 36,824 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
96
of 96 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held96 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total143,775
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
596
Links
6,820

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈2,000 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : 슈퍼 마이크로 컴퓨터, 이익률 크게 상승하며 관심 가져야 - 니덤 외 *연합인포맥스* 니덤의 N. Quinn Bolton 애널리스트는 슈퍼 마이크로 컴퓨터(NAS: SMCI) 실적발표에서 핵심적인 성장지표들이 강력했다고 강조했다. “슈퍼 마이크로 컴퓨터 실적발표에서는 매출이 컨센서스를 하회했지만, 매출총이익률 개선을 중심으로 순이익이 우수하게 나타났다. 또한 경영진은 앞으로의 매출 및 EPS 가이던스를 컨센서스보다 크게 높은 수준으로 제시했다”고 언급했다. “600억 달러에 달하는 수주잔고는 슈퍼 마이크로 컴퓨터의 성장여력을 낙관할 수 있는 근거가 된다”고 강조하면서, “이번 실적발표에서는매출이 저조했으나,

12 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC736 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : 코어위브, 수주잔고와 가격결정력이 투자심리 견인 DB 외 *연합인포맥스* 도이체방크의 애널리스트는 코어위브(NAS: CRWV)의 수주잔고 확대와 가격결정력 등이 투자심리를 견인하고 있다고 전했다. “코어위브의 2분기 실적에서는 우수한 실행력과 수주잔고 확대 추세, 고객층 다양화와 같은 강력한 성장지표를 확인할 수 있었다. 특히 인공지능 컴퓨팅 용량 확대가 계획보다 빠르게 진행되고 있는 것으로 보인다”고 강조했다. “이번 분기에만 수주잔고가 50억 달러 확대되고, 계약이 완료된 컴퓨팅 용량이 4.2GW로 확대되는 등 코어위브 성장에 대한 자신감이 강화되었다”고 설명했다. 투자의견 매수와

12 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,960 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : [개장 전 특징주] 코어위브, 루멘텀 등 우수한 실적 발표하며 랠리 *연합인포맥스* ▲ 코어위브(NAS: CRWV): 영업이익률이 컨센서스를 상회하는 등 강력한 성장 펀더멘털이 확인되었다. 프리마켓에서 18.1% 급등하고 있다. ▲ 슈퍼 마이크로 컴퓨터(NAS: SMCI): 우수한 실적과 가이던스를 발표했다. 프리마켓에서 8.9% 상승하고 있다. ▲ 루멘텀(NAS: LITE): 컨센서스를 상회하는 호실적을 발표했다. 프리마켓에서 8.6% 상승 중이다. ▲ 코히어런트(NAS: COHR): 루멘텀의 호실적에 동반 상승하고 있다. 프리마켓에서 6.2% 상승 중이다. ▲ H&R 블록(NYS: HRB):

12 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : ASML, 인텔의 200억 달러 공모로부터 수혜 전망 *연합인포맥스* 배런스는 인텔이 200억 달러의 자금조달을 추진한다는 보도 이후, ASML(NAS: ASML)이 수혜를 누릴 것이라고 예상했다. 키뱅크의 애널리스트는 “▲ 인텔(NAS: INTC)이 인공지능 반도체 전략을 확대하는 과정에서 200억 달러를 조달할 계획이라고 발표했다. 동사는 주당 95달러에 약 2.1억 주를 매각하게 된다”고 전했다. “인텔은 CPU와 커스텀 ASIC, 파운드리, 첨단패키징 등에 대한 투자를 확대하고 있다. 인텔의 이번 자금조달 또한 관련 반도체 장비에 투자될 것이다”고 강조했다. 외

12 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : [실적 속보] 네비우스, 자본지출 확대에도 현금흐름 개선되며 급등 *연합인포맥스* 네비우스(NAS: NBIS)는 ‘26년 2분기 실적을 다음과 같이 발표했다. ▲ 매출 5억 8,230만 달러(+454% YoY)를 기록했다. 이는 컨센서스를 836만 달러 상회한다. ▲ GAAP EPS -0.68달러(전년 동기 +2.05달러)를 기록했다. 이는 컨센서스를 0.18달러 상회한다. 대규모 자본지출에도 현금흐름이 플러스로 전환되는 등 우수한 실적을 바탕으로 동사의 주가는 프리마켓에서 12.9% 급등하고 있다. 2분기 조정 EBITDA는 2억 3,620만 달러로, 전년 동기 -2,100만 달러에서 흑자로 전

12 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : TSMC, 서버용 CPU 호조로 성장 자신감 강화 - 번스타인 *연합인포맥스* 번스타인의 애널리스트는 서버용 CPU 수요 증가 전망을 통해 TSMC(NYS: TSM) 성장에 대한 자신감이 한층 더 강화되고 있다고 설명했다. "인공지능 에이전트의 이용이 확대되면서 서버용 CPU 수요가 급격히 증가하고 있다. 이러한 CPU 수요 증가 또한 TSMC의 성장세에 기여할 것이다. TSMC의 CPU 제조 매출은 ‘25년에 150억~160억 달러로 추정되는데, ‘27년에는 300억 달러 후반대로 증가할 것으로 보인다"고 분석했다. "대표적인 CPU 개발업체인 ▲ AMD(NAS: AMD) ▲ 인

12 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : 테슬라, 투자심리 회복되려면 피지컬 AI 성과 필요 - MS *연합인포맥스* 모간스탠리의 Andrew Percoco 애널리스트는 테슬라(NAS: TSLA)에 대한 투자심리가 회복되려면 로보택시와 휴머노이드 로봇 전략의 수익성 가시성이 개선되어야 한다고 밝혔다. "테슬라의 피지컬 AI 전략에 대한 투자자들의 기대는 여전히 크다. 하지만 테슬라 투자에 대한 자신감으로 연결되기 위해서는 피지컬 AI 전략이 성과를 거두고 있다는 증거가 필요하다"고 발언했다. "테슬라는 로보택시 사업을 시작했지만, 그 규모는 제한적인 수준에 그치고 있다. 로보택시 공급을 확대하면서 테슬라 매출과 순이익에서 로보

12 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : AMD, ‘27년에 뚜렷한 성장세 가속 예상돼 - 필립 *연합인포맥스* 필립 시큐리티스의 애널리스트는 AMD(NAS: AMD)의 단기적인 수익성이 실망스러울 수 있지만, 장기적인 성장세 및 수익성 전망이 견고하다고분석했다. "당사는 AMD의 ‘26년 순이익 전망치를 8% 하향 조정한다. 클라이언트 및 비디오 게임 부문이 저조한 성장세를 보일 것이라는 전망을 반영한결과다. 메모리 가격이 급등함에 따라 해당 시장의 수요가 위축되고 있기 때문이다"고 밝혔다. 하지만 "AMD의 ‘27년 매출과 순이익 전망치는 각각 4% 상향 조정한다. 이를 견인하는 것은 서버용 Venice CPU,

12 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,950 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : 코어위브, 인공지능 GPU 라이프사이클 예상보다 길어 - 퓨처럼 *연합인포맥스* 퓨처럼 그룹의 Daniel Newman CEO는 코어위브(NAS: CRWV) 실적발표에서 인공지능 GPU의 라이프사이클이 시장 예상보다 길다는 점이 확인되었다고 강조했다. "코어위브는 2분기 컨센서스를 상회하는 우수한 실적을 발표했고, 수주잔고는 1,040억 달러로 전년 동기 대비 세 배 이상 증가했다. 이러한호실적을 중심으로 주가는 애프터마켓에서 15.7% 급등했다"고 전했다. "특히 투자자들이 주목해야 할 점은 코어위브가 보유한 ▲ 엔비디아(NAS: NVDA)의 A100 GPU 리스 계약이 2029년까지 연장되었다

12 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : 온 홀딩 20% 급락했지만 DTC 성장세 관심 가져야 - 스티펄 외 *연합인포맥스* 스티펄의 Peter McGoldrick 애널리스트는 온 홀딩(NYS: ONON)의 주가가 급락했지만, DTC 채널 성장세 등 호재도 주목할 필요가 있다고 판단했다. "온 홀딩은 2분기 컨센서스를 하회하는 매출을 발표했고, 이는 동사 주가가 11일 20% 이상 급락하는 것으로 연결되었다. 하지만 세부적으로살펴보면, DTC 매출 성장세가 가속되면서 예상보다 우수했다는 데 주목할 필요가 있다"고 발언했다. "판촉 확대 속에 도매 부문의 부진이 두드러지고 있지만, DTC 부문이 전체 매출에서 차지하는 비중이 커짐에 따라

12 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : 힘스앤허스, 가이던스·실행 리스크 부담 - BofA 외 *연합인포맥스* 힘스 앤드 허스 헬스(NYS: HIMS)가 ‘26년 2분기 영업실적을 발표한 가운데, 동사에 대한 일부 IB 의견은 다음과 같다. ▲ 뱅크오브아메리카: 투자의견 중립 유지, 목표주가 30달러에서 32달러로 상향. 앨런 러츠 애널리스트는 “힘스앤허스는 2분기에 매출과 가입자 수, EBITDA가 모두 시장 예상을 상회하며 양호한 실적을 기록했다”고 평가했다. 다만 “업데이트된 가이던스는 긍정적 요인과 부정적 요인이 혼재됐다”고 분석했다. ▲ 씨티: 투자의견 중립 유지, 목표주가 35달러에서 33달러로 하향

12 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈3,560 viewsread 12 August 2026

제목 : AST 스페이스, 장기 성장 가시성 강화 - 캔터 외 *연합인포맥스* AST 스페이스모바일(NAS: ASTS)이 ‘26년 2분기 영업실적을 발표한 가운데, 동사에 대한 일부 IB 의견은 다음과 같다. ▲ 캔터 피츠제럴드: 투자의견 비중확대 유지, 목표주가 80달러에서 90달러로 상향. 콜린 캔필드 애널리스트는 “AST 스페이스모바일은 경영진이 ‘26년 가이던스와 수주잔고 가시성, 정부 수요를 재확인하면서 여전히 유리한위치를 유지하고 있다”고 평가했다. 이어 “‘27년 매출 하단이 약 5억 달러 수준으로 형성될 가능성이 있으며, 위성 비용 추세 개선과 미국 및 해외 사업

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @kwusa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 137,740 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“키움증권 미국주식 톡톡” (@kwusa), 36,824 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kwusa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.