https://v.daum.net/v/20260826041157536
❤1

Channel
@kimu_nim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,808subscribers
-188 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001055107259 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kimu_nim |
| Description | Just do it |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kimu_nim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 7,808 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 7,808 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 7,815 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 7,826 | -31 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 7,857 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 7,869 | -65 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 7,934 | -59 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 7,993 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 7,996 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 August 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,308 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
45 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 75.6% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://v.daum.net/v/20260826041157536
❤1
앤트로픽, 투자자에게 30조달러 이상의 시장 잠재력 공개. IPO 기업가치 목표 약 2조달러 • 앤트로픽 IPO 준비 중. 투자자들에게 30조달러 넘는 잠재시장 규모 공개. 스페이스X 기록 경신 계획 • 2028년 매출 1900억-2000억달러 예상. 목표 기업가치 약 2조달러, 최대 1000억달러 조달 추진. 9-10월 상장 예상 • 이와 함께 차세대 미토스 모델 조만간 출시 확률은 74%. 상장 속도 가속화 기대 >> 2025년 미국 GDP 약 31조달러 Anthropic拟向投资者披露超30万亿美元市场潜力,IPO估值目标约2万亿美元 Anthropic正筹备IPO,拟向投资者披露超30万亿美元潜在市场规模,刷新SpaceX创下的纪录。公司预计2028年收入达1900亿至2000亿美元,目标估值约2万亿美元,最高募资1000亿美元,最快9月或10月上市。与此同…
❤1
베선트의 옛 스승 드러켄밀러 “국채 바이백은 실수” (1) 2026-08-25 06:45:23 GMT Matthew Thomas 기자 (블룸버그) -- 스콧 베선트 미 재무장관의 옛 멘토인 억만장자 투자자 스탠리 드러켄밀러가 베선트의 수십억달러 규모 미 국채 바이백 계획을 “실수”라고 지적했다. 드러켄밀러는 베선트가 헤지펀드 트레이더로 활동하던 초기 그의 멘토였다. 그는 월스트리트저널 기고문에서 자신의 오랜 투자 경험을 되짚으며 정책당국이 채권시장에 개입하기보다 시장이 제 역할을 하도록 놔둬야 한다고 주장했다. “펀더멘털에 맞서 가격을 방어하려는 정부는 언제나 패배한다”고 그는 말했다. 베선트와 조지 소로스와 함께 일했던 드러켄밀러는 여전히 월가에서 가장 영향력 있는 투자자 중 한 명으로 그가 이처럼 공개적으로 베선트를 비판한 것은…
❤1
13. 뉴욕 증시 시황 요약 및 전망 브리핑 -시황 요약 8월 25일 뉴욕 증시는 3대 지수가 동반 상승하며 전일의 기술주 조정을 되돌렸다. 지수 상승의 질을 보면 광범위한 위험선호의 확산이라기보다 금리 하락과 반도체 업종의 선별적 강세에 기인한 협소한 랠리로 규정하는 편이 타당하다. 장기 국채금리가 10년물 4.639%, 30년물 5.17%로 동반 하락하며 듀레이션 민감 자산의 할인율 부담을 완화했고, 그 수혜는 유틸리티(+1.98%)와 반도체(+1.80%)에 집중됐다. 반면 소비 관련 지표는 명확히 둔화 신호를 냈다. CB 소비자신뢰지수가 89.4로 1월 이후 최저를 기록하고 신규주택판매가 전월대비 10.5% 급감하면서, 실물 수요의 완만한 침식이 재확인됐다. 이러한 지표 악화가 오히려 금리 하락을 통해 주가를 지지하는 이른바 '악재의 호…
❤1
[뉴욕 증시 브리핑] 1. Major Index (2026년 8월 25일 화요일 뉴욕 정규장 종가 기준, 마감 시각 16:00 EDT) -다우지수 53,577.40pt (+160.24pt, +0.30%) -S&P500지수 7,677.28pt (+24.42pt, +0.32%) -나스닥지수 26,151.30pt (+171.11pt, +0.66%) -필라델피아 반도체지수(^SOX) 11,588.04pt (+164.87pt, +1.44%) -티커 DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) 56.24달러 (+1.96달러, +3.61%) -티커 SKHY (SK hynix Inc.) 159.53달러 (+4.16달러, +2.68%) (참고 지표) -10년물 국채금리 4.639% (-1.38%) -30년물 국채금리 5.17% (-1.09%) -VIX…
❤1
"-89%, 곡소리 난다"...상폐 공포 관리종목들, 병합해도 83%는 '도로 동전주' [상폐 칼바람 분다①] 출처 : 파이낸셜뉴스 | 네이버 https://naver.me/G9UX0jxc
❤1
누구 아이디어인지ᆢㅠ
❤1
'스탠다드=비우량 기업' 낙인…코스닥 승강제, '자금 쏠림'만 키운다 출처 : 머니투데이 | 네이버 https://naver.me/IGsfViPq
❤1
캐나다, 9월 8일부터 美 700개 품목에 15∼50% 보복관세 출처 : 조선비즈 | 네이버 https://naver.me/xm0CpgIq
❤1
미 금리선물 금리인상 확률 9월 25bp 39.6% -> 31.2% 12월 25bp 100% -> 92.8% 12월 50bp 6.4% -> 0.0%
❤1
마켓레이더(8월 25일, 오전) 『순환매는 지속 중』 시황 강진혁 ☎02-3772-2329 KOSPI는 1.9% 하락한 6,569.6p. 반도체 중심 부진에 갭하락 출발 후 대형주 순환매에 6,600p 접근 KOSDAQ은 1.8% 하락한 798.6p. KOSPI 반도체 약세에도 주요 업종 수급 이탈하며 전일 상승분 반납 KOSPI는 1.9% 하락한 6,569.6p. 반도체 중심 부진에 갭하락 출발 후 대형주 순환매에 6,600p 접근 :美, 이란 지원 금융기관 달러 시스템 퇴출 등 경제 제재 발표. 加 자동차·부품/철강 50% 관세 갈등 지속 →구체적 이란 제재 시점 제시 X + 캐나다 관세도 내년 시행으로 시장 영향은 제한. 핵심은 유동성+반도체 :재무부 국채 바이백 규모 확대 이어 9,500억$ TGA 통한 재원 조달 가능성 보도에 …
❤2
제발...좀 그만하자 이것들아... ————— https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/658/0000153335
❤5😁4💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kimu_nim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 410,261 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“김현석(자본주의 바이어스 있는 채널입니다)” (@kimu_nim), 7,808 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kimu_nim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.