Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

여고생 코쨩👉🔕

@jkkospi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,549subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002446025299
TypeChannel
Username@jkkospi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jkkospi

Growth

3,5493,5663,557.56 August 2026 — 3,566 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,566 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,558 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,549 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,546–3,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:533,549-9
9 Aug 2026, 11:523,558-8
6 Aug 2026, 04:343,566no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:483,566first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.44%
avg views ÷ 3,549 subscribers
Avg views / post
158
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held40 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,149
Reactions total29
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍735.0%
630.0%
🤬420.0%
😁315.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC220 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ugh_HHPhoto

내일 서울 날씨 근황 갑자기 4도 뚝 딸어질 예정

7 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC215 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @moopark_robotzccffPhoto

"Had a few" is not just the most useless thing and also waste time.

7 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC202 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dk0425

청와대 핵심관계자는 이날 이 대통령이 상황점검회의 과정에서 관련 세제개편에 투자자들의 반발을 보고받고, 정확한 준비 과정을 거친 것이 맞는지 본래 취지를 왜 못살렸는지 등의 취지로 “전면 재검토를 하라고 지시했다”고 전했다. 이번 세제개편안에는 투자 대상을 국내로 한정한 ISA를 신설하고 기존 ISA의 경우 한도 이월 제도를 폐지하는가 하면 계약 기간도 축소하기로 하면서 청년층과 ‘서학개미’ 등의 투자자들 사이에서 격한 반발이 터져나왔다. https://www.sedaily.com/article/20077165

7 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC172 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @moopark_robotzccff

It seems his name “Klinsman” means “Cleans”man. https://youtu.be/CJCa1_-0lmg?si=xJsKppCIumEPu89T

7 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC140 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @FastStockNewsUSA

왜 국민들의 자유를 자기네들 맘대로 이렇게 제한하는 거죠

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC132 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @FastStockNewsUSA

국장 변동성 줄이고 정책 실패한거 수습하는 거면 국장 ETP만 적용시키면 되지 왜 이걸 애꿎은 미국종목에 적용을 ?

7 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC121 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @FastStockNewsUSA

미국주식 개별종목 레버리지 ETF 안 사지는거 정말 짱나네요

7 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC153 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @usdkkrwPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

7 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC162 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @feathersmacro

뭐 거의 3달 전 지표기는 하지만 애초에 미국 소비는 소득 상위 계층이 이끌어왔음 미국 가계자산 별 주식 보유 비중을 생각하면 부의 효과는 더 커졌을 수 있고 고용과 임금 감소는 K자 경제 하단에 있는 사람들 얘기임

7 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC183 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @insidertrackingPhoto

뱅크오브아메리카(BofA)에 따르면 미국 경제 소비에서 상위 10% 소득 계층이 전체 소비의 약 26%를 차지하는 반면, 하위 10% 소득 계층의 소비 비중은 4% 수준에 그친다는 분석 제시.

7 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC173 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wallstbearcupPhoto

어쩌라고요? 이미 시작하는데 말인게죠.

🤬4

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @jkkospi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 58,202 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“여고생 코쨩👉🔕” (@jkkospi), 3,549 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jkkospi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.