이 채널의 모든 내용들은 투자의 아이디어를 제공하는 것이지 직접 매수매도 추천을 드리는것이 아닙니다. 또한 이곳에 올라오는 모든 글은 믿을만한 정보를 바탕으로 작성 되지만 그것이 완벽하고 정확한 것을 의미하는 것은 아닙니다. 따라서 이곳의 글을 바탕으로 투자하였을 경우 모든 책임은 투자가에게 있는 것입니다
문의 [email protected]
Created
20 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +302. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,005–35,397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 08:37
35,352
+20
18 Sept 2026, 21:39
35,332
+23
16 Sept 2026, 16:19
35,309
+5
14 Sept 2026, 17:41
35,304
+11
13 Sept 2026, 04:58
35,293
+8
11 Sept 2026, 03:41
35,285
+5
8 Sept 2026, 08:21
35,280
+19
5 Sept 2026, 01:20
35,261
+20
3 Sept 2026, 06:59
35,241
+6
2 Sept 2026, 04:55
35,235
+2
1 Sept 2026, 08:08
35,233
-6
31 Aug 2026, 11:03
35,239
-6
30 Aug 2026, 11:25
35,245
-5
29 Aug 2026, 11:52
35,250
-5
28 Aug 2026, 14:28
35,255
-5
26 Aug 2026, 20:34
35,260
-3
25 Aug 2026, 18:52
35,263
+6
24 Aug 2026, 16:29
35,257
+30
23 Aug 2026, 03:48
35,227
+15
21 Aug 2026, 14:14
35,212
first reading
Engagement
241 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 35,352 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,830
98 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.187%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 241 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 96 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
241 (3 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
571,120
Reactions total
1,050
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 05:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈25,500
Videos
≈286
Links
≈9,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
52s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,678 reactions across 235 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,022
38.2%
👍
541
20.2%
🔥
271
10.1%
🤬
259
9.67%
😁
143
5.34%
👏
107
4.00%
🤔
71
2.65%
😱
63
2.35%
🤯
25
0.934%
😨
19
0.709%
🙏
19
0.709%
😢
16
0.597%
🥰
15
0.56%
✍
14
0.523%
☃
13
0.485%
⚡
12
0.448%
😭
11
0.411%
🍾
9
0.336%
🗿
7
0.261%
🏆
6
0.224%
11 further kinds
35
1.31%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 235 of the 241 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 241 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"전쟁, 워시, 그리고 지금 해야 할 일"
UBS 하우스뷰
🎯 핵심 메시지
브렌트유 100달러 돌파, 끈질긴 인플레, 9월 ECB·연준 동반 25bp 인상("인플레가 너무 오랫동안 너무 높았다" — 워시)에도 향후 6~12개월 주식 랠리 지속 전망.
유가·칩·연준보다 더 큰 문제는 과도한 투자 공포로 현금을 쥐고 타이밍만 기다리는 것이라는 진단.
📈 랠리 지속의 5가지 근거
① 견조한 글로벌 경제 — 미 제조업 8개월 연속 확장, 유로존 PMI 4년래 최고
② 성장이 견조한 한 금리 인상은 아직 걱정거리 아님 — 연준 추가 인상 1회만 예상, 성장 감소 효과 0.몇%p
③ 명목 GDP +6.6% 환경에서 S&P 500 EPS 올해 +25%, 2027년 +14% 전망
④ AI capex 2026년 9,000억 → 2027년…
오라클, 전력 못 구해도 투자자에겐 지급 보증: "프로젝트 주피터"의 리스크 구조
FT
🎯 무슨 일이 있었나
오라클이 뉴멕시코 대형 데이터센터의 전력 공급 관련 불가항력(force majeure) 통지를 개발사(블루아울 캐피털 산하)에 발송 — 지역 반대 여론 확산에 따른 인허가 지연이 원인.
그러나 계약 구조상 오라클은 프로젝트가 1단계 가동 시한(2027년 상반기)까지 준비되지 않아도 최대 3년간 임차료를 대신하는 "캐리 코스트"를 지급할 의무 — 채권자 이자 전액 + 블루아울 펀드의 일정 수준 지분 수익까지 커버하는 수수료. 관계자의 표현을 빌리면 전력 조달 리스크는 투자자가 아니라 오라클이 진다는 것.
🏗 프로젝트 주피터의 위상
도냐아나 카운티 1,400에이커 캠퍼스로 공사는 이미 진행 중 — 전력 연결이 제때 안 되면 오라…
채권시장 담보 시스템의 리스크 고조
BOA
MOVE 지수가 이틀 만에 35% 급등하며 갑작스러운 디레버리징 이벤트 리스크가 높은 상태 유지…
MOVE 지수가 125를 넘으면 광범위한 리스크오프 이벤트의 신호가 될 것.
💡 왜 중요한가
MOVE는 주식의 VIX에 해당하는 채권 변동성 지표
국채는 레포 시장과 파생 거래에서 담보의 근간이라, 국채 변동성 급등은 담보 가치 할인(헤어컷) 확대 → 마진콜 → 포지션 강제 축소로 이어지는 디레버리징 연쇄의 방아쇠가 될 수 있음.
특히 베이시스 트레이드 등 레버리지 국채 포지션이 역대급으로 쌓인 환경에서는 변동성 자체가 시스템 리스크.
Shall We Repeal the Laws of Economics – Part III
하워드 막스
경제 법칙을 거스르려는 시도
2024년 9월과 2025년 6월, 저는 경제 법칙을 거스르려는 정부의 시도를 비판하는 메모를 작성했습니다. 그러한 시도는 무익할 뿐만 아니라 잠재적으로 해롭다는 확신 때문이었습니다. 경제는 자연적으로 기능하는 유기체이므로, 인위적으로 조종하려 들면 왜곡이 발생해 전반적인 결과를 악화시킵니다. 광범위한 빈곤이나 실업을 막기 위해 가끔 개입이 필요할 수도 있지만, 이는 매우 선별적이고 극도로 신중해야 합니다.
가장 적절한 비유는 자연입니다. 영화 '라이온 킹'에 나오는 '생명의 순환'처럼 생태계는 적자생존을 통해 균형을 유지합니다. 인간이 피식자를 보호하고자 포식자를 억제하면, 다른 종이 통제 불능으로 번식해…
Showing the 12 most recent of 241 posts we hold for @bumgore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
키움증권 미국주식 톡톡 @kwusa · 36,480 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환 @HANAchina · 35,301 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
YM리서치 @ym_research · 40,071 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
HS아카데미 대표 이효석 @HS_academy · 36,164 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀 @SmallCap · 23,176 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Yeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기 @Yeouido_Lab · 43,309 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
AWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널 @darthacking · 65,078 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
Buff @bufkr · 22,185 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
실시간 주식 뉴스 @realtime_stock_news · 37,210 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
가치투자클럽 @corevalue · 67,505 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Rafiki research @rafikiresearch · 20,596 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver @pharmbiohana · 29,812 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
이지스스트레티지 리서치 @jeilstock · 26,408 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
재야의 고수들 @gaoshoukorea · 41,159 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
루팡 @bornlupin · 48,199 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
YIELD & SPREAD @yieldnspread · 22,018 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관] @merITz_tech · 24,059 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
선수촌 @athletes_village · 21,621 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
AWAKE - 52주 신고가 모니터링 @awake_realtimeCheck · 22,632 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
시황맨의 주식이야기 @shmstory · 38,160 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
TNBfolio @TNBfolio · 24,657 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西 @YeouidoStory2 · 58,411 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
도PB의 생존투자 @survival_DoPB · 22,243 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
조기주식회 공부방 @EarlyStock1 · 24,402 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“시장 이야기 by 제이슨” (@bumgore), 35,352 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bumgore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.