■ 마감 시황·수급 (31건) · 코스피, 5거래일 만에 '7천피' 탈환...0.46% 상승 (관련 기사 11건) — 연합뉴스 · 7000선 탈환한 코스피 (관련 기사 5건) — 뉴스1 · 코스피, 5거래일 만에 7000선 탈환 (관련 기사 3건) — 한경비즈니스 · [스팟]코스닥 1.00포인트(0.11%) 내린 893.29 마감 (관련 기사 3건) — 머니투데이 · 코스피 상승, 코스닥 하락 마감 (관련 기사 2건) — 뉴시스 · 증시 마감 시황 (관련 기사 2건) — 뉴시스 더보기... https://yeouidonews.com/p/72155

Channel
여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西
@YeouidoStory2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
58,411subscribers
-109 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001086116949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YeouidoStory2 |
| Description | 볼만한 뉴스와 증권사리포트, 글로벌경제뉴스. 와신 등을 공유합니다. 내용은 매도/매수의 의견이 아닙니다.매매에 대한 책임은 본인에게있습니다 ●/ ●/ 《 | 《 | /〉 제보.문의 /〉 제보/각종 문의 받습니다. @yeouidooppa |
| Created | 19 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YeouidoStory2 |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 58,411 | -35 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 58,446 | -43 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:42 | 58,489 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 58,491 | +17 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 58,474 | +96 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 58,378 | +24 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 58,354 | -52 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 58,406 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 58,412 | -23 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:04 | 58,435 | -34 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 58,469 | +19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 58,450 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 58,460 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 58,470 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 58,483 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 58,489 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 58,505 | -22 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 58,527 | -41 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 58,568 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 58,562 | first reading |
Engagement
1,305 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 118 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.07%
- avg views ÷ 58,411 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,550
- 671 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.107%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 671
- of 1,305 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 203 of 671 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,305 (6 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,380,082 |
| Reactions total | 850 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 19:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,510
- Videos
- ≈76
- Links
- ≈88,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 44s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,401 reactions across 312 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 491 | 35.0% | |
| 🔥 | 356 | 25.4% | |
| 😱 | 233 | 16.6% | |
| 😁 | 146 | 10.4% | |
| 👏 | 128 | 9.14% | |
| 🙏 | 47 | 3.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 321 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,401 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
씨케이솔루션 시총 700억.. https://www.thelec.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=63206
비에이치 상세기업분석 YeouidoNews.com
👍1
https://n.news.naver.com/article/015/0005338621?cds=news_edit
😱9
https://www.mk.co.kr/news/business/12167164
File, posted without a caption
<10월 2일 보고서‧기사‧특징주> ▶️보고서 전기전자 In-depth: AI가 앉는 자리, AI를 채우는 힘(한투) -MLCC 가격 상승은 이제 시작 -AI 서버 MLCC 수요는 빠르게 증가, MLCC Capa 증가는 제한적 -Top pick: 삼성전기, 심텍 https://vo.la/bvojEIm 제약바이오 : 장기지속형 기술에 베팅하는 빅파마(다올) -비만치료제 경쟁이 투약 편의성으로 확대 -국내의 지투지바이오·인벤티지랩·펩트론 주목 https://buly.kr/4mfesui 삼성전자 3Q프리뷰: 매력적 저평가 구간(삼성증권) https://bit.ly/4AHwlB8 코스메카코리아 : 여전히 견조하다! (140,000원 상향/현대차) -고성장 대형 고객사들의 견조한 대량 수주는 지속되고 있음 https://buly.kr/B…
[[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]] [메리츠증권 전기전자/IT부품 양승수] 금일 동박 밸류체인의 가격 인상 기대감과 관련해, 두산 전자BG의 마진 스퀴즈 우려가 일부 제기되고 있어 이 부분도 간단히 코멘트 드립니다. 우선 CCL에 사용되는 회로박은 주요 원재료 중 공급처 다변화가 잘 이루어진 품목으로, 공급업체의 일방적인 판가 인상이 쉽지 않은 구조입니다. 실제 글로벌 1위 업체 Mitsui Kinzoku 역시 지난 실적발표에서 고객사향 판가 인상에 어려움을 언급한 바 있습니다. 특히 전자BG의 Computing향 CCL은 Vera Rubin Ultra까지 HVLP4가 적용될 예정으로, 차세대 플랫폼에서도 추가적인 스펙 상향이 제한적인 만큼 회로박 가격 인상 가능성은 높지 않다고 판단합니다. 또한 금일 부각되고 있는 동박…
https://yeouidonews.com/p/70838 [점심 브리핑] 10월 2일(금) 13:30 ■ 핵심 요약 (AI) · 코스피는 7,000선 아래에서 움직이며 보합권에 머물러 있습니다. · 국내 주식시장에서 개인투자자들은 종목별로 희비가 엇갈리는 모습을 보이고 있으며, 특히 삼성전자(삼전)와 SK하이닉스(닉스) 주가는 부진한 반면 일부 테마주는 상승세를 나타내고 있습니다. · 홍콩 증시는 중동발 에너지 공급 우려로 ...
가입만 PC로 가입하고 폰에서 산업분석. 종목분석. 업종비교 까지 PDF 받아 틈틈히 공부합시다 https://yeouidonews.com/guide
성호전자 기업분석자료 https://yeouidonews.com/guide 회원가입후 토탈기업정보에서 종목명만 치면 저렇게 나옴 (PC로 하는걸 추천)
한화에어로스페이스 https://dealsite.co.kr/articles/170046
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,305 posts we hold for @YeouidoStory2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@YeouidoStory2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 3 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Rhinoceros_300 · 25 posts호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,3154 postsYeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,2773 posts크레박스
@cr_box · 293 posts인포마켓 infomarket
@infomarketopen · 8,6502 posts주식클라쓰_하창봉👍
@sharpha · 9,1412 postsBrain and Body Research
@Brain_And_Body_Research · 34,9741 post제이지의 투자이야기
@JgrowthInv · 3,0121 post한투 제약/바이오 위해주
@KIS_Healthcare · 8,8311 post코인포
@coinpo2 · 6,9031 post간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,7511 post서화백의 그림놀이 🚀
@easobi · 23,5971 postPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,0221 post허혜민의 제약/바이오 소식통
@huhpharm · 24,3081 post아스달 (IPO&스몰캡 달인)
@iposmallcap · 2,6071 post김현석(자본주의 바이어스 있는 채널입니다)
@kimu_nim · 7,7321 post세상의 모든 뉴스 - 좋은뉴스,단독,속보,리포트,특허,타 채널 뉴스 - 세모뉴
@newszzang · 10,9991 post힙한 펭미업의 1인칭 시점
@pengmeup · 9,1391 post제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver
@pharmbiohana · 29,8121 post로로의 부자아빠
@rorosrichdad · 21 post스몰인사이트리서치
@smallinsightresearch · 5,7421 post손지의 웹3여행 Read
@sonycoinz · 9901 post🗽엄브렐라(Umbrella Research) 리서치+ 네프콘 옆집부자형 since 2020
@umbrellaresearch · 12,8311 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@daegurr · 23,375#1
@FastStockNews · 128,781#2
@corevalue · 67,505#3
@hogniel · 15,315#4
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,277#5
@darthacking · 65,078#6
@bufkr · 22,185#7
@kimcharger · 24,931#8
@bdragon0808 · 13,414#9
@G2strategy · 14#10
@tazastock · 40,440#11
@yaza_stock · 13,070#12
@bbanjil · 10,732#13
@hermitcrab41_1 · 20,374#14
@bumgore · 35,352#15
@awake_realtimeCheck · 22,632#16
@Ten_level · 17,116#17
@fastest_info1 · 13,317#18
@Onionfarmer · 15,975#19
@bumsong2 · 13,092#20
@stocktrip · 7,286#21
@growthresearch · 40,159#22
@hedgehara · 19,022#23
@allbareun · 12,221#24
@insangnism · 11,282#25
@hanagae · 4,639#26
@TRENDSETTERVERSION2 · 3,929#27
@realtime_stock_news · 37,210#28
@survival_DoPB · 22,243#29
@orangeboard · 4,656#30
@quantum_ALGO · 7,549#31
@athletes_village · 21,621#32
@GoUpstock · 20,970#33
@cyber_rangers · 16,936#34
@aptvalueprice · 10,716#35
@Dogrini · 4,770#36
@investment_puzzle · 14,375#37
@slsyphus · 4,401#38
@mk81_koreainvestment · 16,431#39
@Fire_Direction_Center · 5,443#40
@ym_research · 40,071#41
@anysong_Technon · 4,976#42
@stockinvcowcow · 13,942#43
@awake_schedule · 17,220#44
@seokokang · 6,191#45
@habit4117 · 27,930#46
@umbrellaresearch · 12,831#47
@knowledge_to_wealth · 14,170#48
@rafikiresearch · 20,556#49
@Kyaooo · 17,390#50
@TNBfolio · 24,657#51
@hankyung_fin · 12,694#52
@HANAchina · 35,301#53
@siglab · 10,821#54
@econostudy · 8,512#55
@jake8lee · 17,256#56
@mistergray_11 · 19,521#57
@EarlyStock1 · 24,402#58
@TambangVot · 8,598#59
@stockhasoo · 5,109#60
@huhpharm · 24,308#61
@bbong_tta · 12,692#62
@gaoshoukorea · 41,159#63
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,509#64
@mstaryun · 18,703#65
@upper_limit_price · 8,000#66
@redbirdstock · 10,539#67
@psychotherapy101 · 5,958#68
@sunstudy1234 · 54,638#69
@stockgrandmaster · 10,920#70
@CTTResearch · 6,889#71
@theelec · 10,811#72
@triple_stock · 12,956#73
@pharmbiohana · 29,812#74
@desperatestudycafe · 18,751#75
@mztanyong · 6,005#76
@bornlupin · 48,199#77
@yieldnspread · 22,018#78
@cpshelter · 5,427#79
@jeilstock · 26,408#80
@getfeed · 8,783#81
@yakjangsu · 11,424#82
@Jstockclass · 26,067#83
@choaz1 · 7,068#84
@merITz_tech · 24,059#85
@SmallCap · 23,176#86
@selfstudystock · 3,719#87
@kwtok · 9,419#88
@sypark_strategy · 29,465#89
@Korea_value · 5,486#90
@tteoksangMalangCow · 53 (as read 2 September 2026)#91
@pikachu_aje · 25,217#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@realtime_stock_news · 37,210
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@FastStockNews · 128,781
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@corevalue · 67,505
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,522
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@HANAchina · 35,301
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@TelegramTipsKo · 105,539
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 30 September 2026
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,277
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@darthacking · 65,078
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@huhpharm · 24,308
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@shmstory · 38,553
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@rafikiresearch · 20,556
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@ym_research · 40,071
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@growthresearch · 40,159
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@kwusa · 36,480
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@SmallCap · 23,176
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
@tazastock · 40,440
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,678
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@survival_DoPB · 22,243
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@pharmbiohana · 29,812
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
@gaoshoukorea · 41,159
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@TNBfolio · 24,657
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@jeilstock · 26,408
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
@GoUpstock · 20,970
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
@bumgore · 35,352
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西” (@YeouidoStory2), 58,411 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YeouidoStory2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.