Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 12 of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 181 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 98 days, net -426. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,023–21,577 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 07:05
21,087
-1
8 Nov 2026, 19:11
21,088
-8
6 Nov 2026, 09:47
21,096
-15
5 Nov 2026, 08:49
21,111
-1
4 Nov 2026, 11:45
21,112
-4
3 Nov 2026, 13:36
21,116
-5
2 Nov 2026, 13:19
21,121
-6
1 Nov 2026, 15:06
21,127
-11
31 Oct 2026, 13:37
21,138
+4
30 Oct 2026, 14:11
21,134
-9
28 Oct 2026, 07:56
21,143
-10
27 Oct 2026, 06:55
21,153
-1
26 Oct 2026, 03:57
21,154
-6
25 Oct 2026, 03:50
21,160
-8
24 Oct 2026, 01:56
21,168
+3
22 Oct 2026, 22:17
21,165
-10
21 Oct 2026, 16:09
21,175
-8
20 Oct 2026, 13:27
21,183
-5
19 Oct 2026, 16:47
21,188
-2
18 Oct 2026, 19:09
21,190
first reading
Engagement
658 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.91%
avg views ÷ 21,087 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
199 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.493%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
199
of 658 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 190 of 199 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
658 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
374,096
Reactions total
1,797
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 03:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 52s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,008 reactions across 610 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,136
51.6%
❤
3,524
44.0%
🔥
348
4.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 632 of the 658 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 658 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 15 of 199 posts held from the last 30 days (7.54%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
오늘, 나는 한 발 물러서서 비트코인 시장을 거시경제적 관점에서 살펴보고자 한다.
상대적으로 전통적인 접근 방식일 수 있지만, 현재 비트코인이 직면한 심각한 유동성 제약을 고려할 때, 더 넓은 거시 환경을 재검토하는 것이 중요하다고 믿는다.
먼저 결론부터 시작하겠다.
"비트코인 시장은 아직 충분한 축적 과정을 거치지 않았으며, 유동성 상황은 계속 악화되고 있다. 이 시점에서 시장이 큰 충격을 피하기를 바랄 수밖에 없다. 설령 피한다 하더라도, 많은 사람들이 예상하는 것보다 훨씬 더 긴 기간의 횡보 조정 국면이 필요할 수 있다."
이전 분석에서 반복적으로 논의했듯이, 비트코인의 내부 유동성 상황은 극도로 우려스럽다.
매수 측 유동성은 계속 약화되고 있으며, 시장은 상당한 유동성 압박을 겪고 있다.
이러한 배경 속에서, 나는 미국 달러…
🔥 차분남 × Gate 신규 가입 이벤트 🔥
전용 링크로 가입하고 KYC 인증과 첫 거래를 완료하면 출금 가능한 10 USDT를 즉시 지급.
✅ 참여 방법
1. 해당 링크로 신규 가입
2. KYC(본인 인증) 완료
3. 첫 거래 완료
✅ 지급 혜택
- 1인당 10 USDT(즉시 출금 가능)
📅 이벤트 기간
- 참여 조건을 모두 충족한 선착순 100명까지 지급
🚨 주의사항
- 최초 가입자만 해당(중복 계정 X)
- 선착순 100명 도달 시 이벤트 종료와 동시에 즉시 지급
🔅추가혜택
- 조건 완료 후 개인 메세지 보내면 관점공유방 링크 보내드립니다.
🚨 스트래티지(MSTR)의 MSCI 지수 편출 확정.
MSCI World 지수에서도 제외된다고 보도.
(미국 11월 30일 장 마감 후 반영 예정)
지수 추종 펀드의 리밸런싱으로 MSTR 주식에 매도 압력이 생길 수 있음.
다만, 이번 편출로 스트래티지가 보유한 비트코인을 매도할 의무가 생기지는 않음.
📅 이번 주 알트코인 주요 일정 (11/9~11/15)
🔴 11/11(수) | ALLO
-약 1.6억 개 토큰 언락 예정
-유통량 대비 대규모 물량으로 공급 부담 주의
🔴 11/11~14 | PUMP
-약 68.8억 개 토큰 언락 예정
-팀 및 투자자 물량으로 매도 압력 가능성
-정확한 언락 날짜 추가 확인 필요
🔴 11/15~16 | ARB
-약 9,265만 개 토큰 언락 예정
-단기 공급 증가에 따른 변동성 주의
🟢 11/15~17 | SOL
-Breakpoint 2026 개최
-생태계 주요 발표 및 신규 파트너십 여부 주목
※ 일정 및 물량은 공개 집계 기준이며 변경될 수 있습니다.
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 658 posts we hold for @chavoonnam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@chavoonnam edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 November 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 658 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
갓물주 (코인정보, 돈되는거) @godmulzoo · 22,634 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
크립토퀀트 알람 @cq_alert_kr · 21,587 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
COINNESS News Feed (코인니스) @coinnesskr · 30,389 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
블록미디어 @blockmedia · 32,899 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
코인 갤러리(Coin gallery) @dogeland01 · 20,904 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
디지털자산/AI/경제(케이씨지) @coinkcgchannel · 15,339 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH @BChoSN · 26,326 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
해달의 투자 정보 공유 @seaotterbtc · 29,999 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
졸업준비위원회🎓 @officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,657 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN @emperorcoin · 35,511 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
취미생활방📮 @enjoymyhobby · 48,840 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
불개미 CRYPTO @fireant_crypto · 32,703 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
우리는 트윗충 @twitchoong · 79,274 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Gram 🇰🇷 @toncoin_kr · 22,951 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“차분남(차트분석하는남자)” (@chavoonnam), 21,087 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chavoonnam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.