바이오는 한양
공식 리포트 이외의 내용은 매수매도 추천 아닙니다. 뉴스와 개인생각입니다.
절대 채널 보시고 투자하지 마세요. 모든 투자 책임은 본인에게 있습니다.
해당 게시물의 내용은 부정확할 수 있으며 어떠한 경우에도 법적으로 활용될수 없습니다. 매매에 따른 손실은 거래 당사자의 책임입니다.
Created
5 April 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 94 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 96 days, net +247. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,203–13,525 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 07:52
13,488
+30
9 Nov 2026, 13:06
13,458
+3
8 Nov 2026, 04:17
13,455
+2
5 Nov 2026, 22:29
13,453
-5
4 Nov 2026, 23:16
13,458
-3
3 Nov 2026, 21:20
13,461
-4
2 Nov 2026, 20:47
13,465
-5
1 Nov 2026, 17:15
13,470
-2
31 Oct 2026, 17:36
13,472
-1
30 Oct 2026, 14:28
13,473
+1
29 Oct 2026, 16:19
13,472
+3
27 Oct 2026, 15:17
13,469
-2
26 Oct 2026, 13:21
13,471
+3
25 Oct 2026, 15:46
13,468
+2
24 Oct 2026, 12:26
13,466
-1
23 Oct 2026, 15:46
13,467
-5
22 Oct 2026, 19:21
13,472
+2
21 Oct 2026, 13:46
13,470
+5
20 Oct 2026, 10:40
13,465
+9
18 Oct 2026, 13:11
13,456
first reading
Engagement
213 posts held, back to 5 April 2020 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.1%
avg views ÷ 13,488 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,440
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
62
of 213 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
213 (5 April 2020 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
151,000
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 21:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
12
Links
42
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 62 posts held from the last 30 days (8.06%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
85억달러 가치
AI자율화 실험실 대표 기업 ’Lila Sciences‘
관련 내용
https://www.lila.ai/news/ai-is-not-going-to-solve-all-the-problems-in-the-energy-sector-but-it-might-fix-this-one?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.baio.technology/p/why-lila-may-raise-2b-for-scientific-superintelligence?utm_source=chatgpt.com
#리브스메드
- 복강경 수술도구는 (1)일반기구, (2)혈관봉합기, (3)스테이플러, (4)복강경카메라. 총 4개 제품이 있음. 4개를 통합하면 로봇
- 시장 규모는 뒤로 갈수록 커짐
- 현재는 구형 일반기구 아티센셜 단일제품만 판매 중. 구형 아티센셜 분기 실적은 매출 100억/ 영업손실 100억 내외 나오는 중
- 9월 일반기구 신제품 ‘아티센셜 PRO’ 출시
- 11월부터 관절형 혈관봉합기 ‘아티씰’ 판매개시 예정
- 연내에는 수술로봇 ‘스타크’ 허가 예정
#지씨지놈
- 올해 췌장암 혈액 조기검사 제품 ‘PancSight’의 후향적 임상시험(2,800례) 진행.
- 10월에 중간결과 발표(1/2기 암 민감도 93.7, 특이도 95.4)
- 12월 FDA BDD(혁신의료기기) 신청을 진행 예정. 그럼 내년 상반기에 BDD지정 예정.
- 미국 파트너사와 판권 MOU되어있고, BDD지정 이후 본계약 진행 예정.
- 임상 결과발표 이후 주가 빠졌는데, 12월 BDD 신청과 함께 최종결과도 발표 예정
#AI자율실험실 관련주식
실험실 완전 자율화가 이루어지면 AI가 스스로 쉬지도않고 무한의 실험을 실행할 수 있음 -> 신약 발견 신소재 발견 등 과학 연구속도 폭증
- 큐리옥스바이오시스템즈
사람이 하던 시약을 넣고 세포 염색/세척 자동화
- 큐리오시스
사람이 하던 현미경으로 세포 관찰/촬영 자동화
한양증권 제약/바이오 Analyst 오병용
[큐리옥스바이오시스템즈] AI바이오 시대 ‘실험'이 병목이다
투자의견: N.R
목표주가 : -
현재주가(11/11): 57,900원
Upside : -
사람이 하는 실험이 병목이다
바이오 업계에서 AI활용의 병목 중 하나로 ‘실험’이 꼽히고 있다. 과학적 가설을 세우고 그것을 실험으로 검증해야 하는데, 사람이 직접 진행하는 Wet-lab실험(세포, 조직, 혈액, 시약 등을 직접 다루면서 실험하는 방식)에 절대적 시간/비용 소모가 너무 크다. 가설이 있어도 그것을 검증하고 데이터를 도출하는 데 몇 개월씩 걸린다는 뜻이다. 실험자에 따라 실험의 일관성도 떨어져 AI가 학습하기도 어렵다. 따라서 최근에는 실험실의 자율화를 추진하는 기업들이 많아지고 있다. 실험실 완전 자율화가 이루어지면 AI가 수많…
2026년 11월 12일(목) 제약/바이오 Daily News
“신약 개발만으로 충분하지 않다”…바이엘, 건강수명 연장 위한 의료 접근성 강조
바이엘 “아태 고령화 대응, 조기진단부터 치료 혁신까지”…건강수명 연장 전략 제시
노바티스 ‘비오뷰’ 미국‧캐나다 전권 전문 제약사 이양
바이오 기술 '주권' 진짜 시험대는 '제조·임상'
[바이오유럽-인터뷰] 넥스아이 “NXI-201 기술이전 협상 상당히 진전”…27년 빅딜 정조준上
GC녹십자, 협력사와 지속가능 공급망·ESG 협력 강화
CAR-T 치료제 '예스카타' 급여 진전…리포락셀도 기준 설정
비씨월드제약, 창립 20주년 가족초청행사 개최…500여명 참여
제이투케이바이오, 3Q 영업익 전년 동기 대비 109% 급증…매출 동반 성장
제약바이오, 신약·수출이 이끈 성장...3분기 실…
다빈치 5 식도암 로봇수술군의 성대 기능 장애 비율이 13.5%로 기존 기기군보다 낮았습니다.
삼성서울병원 연구팀이 식도 편평세포암 환자 163명의 로봇 식도절제술 결과를 비교했습니다. 다빈치 5 수술군 37명에서 수술 후 성대 움직임 감소나 마비가 나타난 비율은 13.5%로, 다빈치Xi군 126명의 33.3%보다 낮았습니다.
입원 기간 중앙값은 다빈치 5군이 11일, 다빈치Xi군이 13일이었습니다. 수술 시간과 출혈량, 제거한 림프절 수에는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었으며, 연구 결과는 국제학술지 Journal of Robotic Surgery 최근호에 실렸습니다. 연구팀은 다빈치 5의 조직 저항감 감지와 힘 조절 기능이 성대 기능 장애 감소와 관련됐을 가능성을 제시했습니다.
더파마뉴스에서 보기
https://thepharmanews…
현재 로봇수술은 시가입니다. 수술 건당 1,000만원을 받든 2,000만원을 받든 병원 마음입니다. 국민의료비 총지출 측면에서 보면, 장기적으로 정부에서 통제하게 될 가능성이 높아 보입니다.
예를 들면 탈장수술 상한가는 500만원, 그 중 20%는 급여. 이런 식으로 통제될 것입니다. 그럼 병원입장에서는 원가를 낮추기 위해 저렴하고 품질 좋은 로봇을 쓸 니즈가 점차 커지게 됩니다.
2000년대 임플란트도 비급여로 가격이 매우 비쌌으나, 결국 가격이 통제되고 보험화 되면서 저렴하고 품질좋은 오스템임플란트가 시장을 장악한 사례가 있습니다.
심평원의 로봇수술 급여화 검토 건강보험 연구가 11월 완료되네요
건강보험심사평가원은 “로봇 보조 수술 급여화를 검토하기 위해 지난 4월부터 연구를 시행하고 있다”며 “올해 11월경 완료될 예정이다”고 밝혔다.
https://health.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2026/07/09/2026070902851.html
한양증권 스몰캡 Analyst 이준석
[디케이티] 디케이티의 새로운 성장 패러다임
투자의견: N.R
목표주가 : -
현재주가(11/10): 23,400원
Upside : -
성장의 윤곽은 뚜렷해지고
동사의 2026년 예상 실적은 매출액 5,453억 원(+28.1% YoY), 영업이익 361억 원(+67.3% YoY)을 기록할 것으로 전망한다. 기존 모바일 사업의 계절적 변동성에도 불구하고 ESS BMS와 전장사업의 공급 확대가 실적 성장을 이끌고 있다. 특히 ESS BMS는 국내 배터리 3사의 공급망 진입을 기반으로 고객사 다변화가 본격화되고 있으며, 차량용 OLED와 무선충전기(WPC) 역시 신규 완성차 업체향 공급 개시와 기존 고객사의 물량 증가가 맞물리고 있다. 이에 따라 2027년 ESS BMS, 차량용 OLED, WPC의 예…
Showing the 12 most recent of 213 posts we hold for @bdragon0808. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@bdragon0808 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @bdragon0808 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver @pharmbiohana · 29,789 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
허혜민의 제약/바이오 소식통 @huhpharm · 24,264 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
AWAKE - 52주 신고가 모니터링 @awake_realtimeCheck · 22,881 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
루팡 @bornlupin · 49,268 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西 @YeouidoStory2 · 57,976 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
YM리서치 @ym_research · 39,821 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
그로쓰리서치(Growth Research) [독립리서치] @growthresearch · 40,090 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
가치투자클럽 @corevalue · 67,105 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
실시간 주식 뉴스 @realtime_stock_news · 36,958 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
조기주식회 공부방 @EarlyStock1 · 24,363 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
카이에 de market @cahier_de_market · 23,110 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
김찰저의 관심과 생각 저장소 @kimcharger · 25,261 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
주식 급등일보🚀급등테마·대장주 탐색기 | Korean Stocks @FastStockNews · 128,811 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
오를주식 - 뉴스/경제/주식 @GoUpstock · 21,091 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
⚡️번개맞은뉴스 - 상위2% 주식텔레그램 채널 @stock_messenger · 25,223 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
타점 읽어주는 여자(타자) @tazastock · 40,978 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
스탁이지 - AI 투자 어시스턴트 @maddingStock · 20,900 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
서화백의 그림놀이 🚀 @easobi · 23,419 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘 @habit4117 · 28,295 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
Yeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기 @Yeouido_Lab · 43,450 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
Buff @bufkr · 21,563 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀 @SmallCap · 22,982 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
시장 이야기 by 제이슨 @bumgore · 35,362 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관] @merITz_tech · 24,857 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“한양증권 제약/바이오 오병용” (@bdragon0808), 13,488 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bdragon0808.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.