Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

서화백의 그림놀이 🚀

@easobi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,903subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009765098
TypeChannel
Username@easobi
Description#Disclaimer 해당 채널의 게시물은 단순 의견 및 기록용도이고 매수-매도 등 투자권유를 의미하지 않습니다. 해당 게시물의 내용은 부정확할 수 있으며 매매에 따른 손실은 거래 당사자의 책임입니다. 해당 게시물의 내용은 어떤 경우에도 법적 근거로 사용될 수 없습니다. 채널 게시물에 포함된 일부 종목은 보유중일 수 있으며 언제든 매도할 수 있습니다
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/easobi

Growth

23,88423,93423,9096 August 2026 — 23,914 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,898 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,884 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,893 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,934 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,924 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,908 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,903 subscribers23,9036 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,877–23,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:3423,903-5
12 Aug 2026, 05:0623,908-16
11 Aug 2026, 04:0723,924-10
10 Aug 2026, 07:0123,934+41
9 Aug 2026, 05:1123,893+9
8 Aug 2026, 08:4123,884-14
7 Aug 2026, 05:0423,898-16
6 Aug 2026, 10:5223,914first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 23,903 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,060
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.149%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 92 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held102 (4 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total312,618
Reactions total432
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10,100
Videos
185
Links
2,410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
47s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

432 reactions across 92 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁27764.1%
🤬7918.3%
🤔7617.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 432reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 102 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @easobi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 102 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC805 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📝 텔레그램 심층 분석 Report (19시 07분) 기준 🌡️ 센티먼트 관망 (+5) 💡 요약 긍정적 실적 발표와 부정적 시장 이슈가 혼재하여 시장 참여자들이 관망세를 보이고 있습니다. 🗣️ Top 키워드: 실적(546), 반도체(476), AI(284), SMR(140), 대출(139) 🔥 주목받는 종목 📉 SK하이닉스 (-40) 매도 권고 (높은 관심: FWD 14), 매도 권고 (높은 관심: FWD 64), 주주 반발 논란 (높은 관심: FWD 9), 글로벌 반도체 동반강세, HBM4 가격 예상보다 높음, 글로벌 성장 이끈다 📈 제주반도체 (+35) 실적 대폭 호전, 2Q 영업이익 일회성 효과 제외 시 슈퍼 서프라이즈 📈 한국금융지주 (+20) KDB생명 인수 우선협상자 선정 📈 세진중공업 (+10) 2026 2Q 잠정실적 컨센

😁2

13 Aug 2026, 02:07 UTC≈1,670 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📝 텔레그램 심층 분석 Report (11시 07분) 기준 🌡️ 센티먼트 긍정 (+50) 💡 요약 AI 및 반도체 섹터의 강세와 실적 기대감이 시장을 이끌지만, 일부 기업들의 실적 하회 및 시장 우려도 상존. 🗣️ Top 키워드: AI(20), 삼성전자(16), 반도체(11), SK하이닉스(9), 실적(9) 🔥 주목받는 종목 📈 달바글로벌 (+150) 2Q 잠정실적 컨센 상회 (매출 1,869억), 컨센 상회 📈 삼영 (+115) 2Q 잠정실적 컨센 부합 (매출 540억), 컨센 부합 📈 씨어스 (+105) 2Q 잠정실적 컨센 하회 (매출 284억), 상반기 매출 609억원, 영업이익 268억원 기록 (지난해 연간 실적 초과 달성), 컨센 하회 📈 씨피시스템 (+50) 2Q 잠정실적 컨센 상회 (매출 68억), 컨센 상회 📈 LG에너지솔

😁2

13 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC≈2,150 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @easobi_aiPhoto

🚀 달바글로벌 483650 · 연결 2026 2Q 잠정실적 · 컨센 상회 구분 실적 컨센 컨센대비 매출 1,869억 1,832억 +2% 영업익 472억 412억 +14% 순익 381억 312억 +22% 🔗 DART 공시 원문 투자 판단 참고용 · 데이터: 액시즈 대시보드 🖌 서화백의그림놀이 ✉️ https://t.me/easobi 🖌 서화백의AI놀이 ✉️ https://t.me/easobi_ai 🖌 액시즈의대시보드 ✉️ https://dashboard.camelresearch.com

😁2

12 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC≈2,050 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @easobi_ai

2026년 8월 12일 글로벌 마감 시황 브리핑 📈📉 2026년 8월 12일 뉴욕 증시는 대체로 상승세로 마감했습니다. 스탠더드앤드푸어스 500 지수는 0.26% 상승한 7748.50을 기록했고, 나스닥 종합 지수는 0.54% 상승한 26609.51에 거래를 마쳤습니다. 다우존스 산업평균 지수는 0.04% 하락한 53770.27로 사실상 보합세를 보였습니다. 이날 시장은 예상치에 부합한 7월 소비자물가지수(CPI) 발표 이후 연방준비제도(Fed)의 추가 긴축 우려가 완화되면서 비교적 제한된 범위 내에서 등락을 보였습니다. 인플레이션 보고서가 시장의 전반적인 전망을 크게 바꾸지 않자, 투자자들의 관심은 개별 주식과 섹터로 빠르게 이동했습니다. 특히 인공지능(AI) 관련 반도체 주식에 대한 낙관론이 재점화되며 기술주 전반에 활력을 불어넣었습니다

😁4

12 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC≈1,500 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📝 텔레그램 심층 분석 Report (07시 04분) 기준 🌡️ 센티먼트 환호 (+75) 💡 요약 AI 및 반도체 기업들의 호실적과 예상치를 하회한 CPI 지표로 금리 인상 우려가 완화되며 시장 전반에 강한 기대감이 형성되고 있습니다. 🗣️ Top 키워드: AI(40), 반도체(25), 실적(30), CPI(10), 메모리(15) 🔥 주목받는 종목 📈 COHERENT (+90) FY26 4분기 매출 21억 달러로 예상치 상회, 조정 EPS 1.74달러 기록하며 호실적 달성, 사상 최대 수주잔고 확보 및 CPO 수요 연기 없음 확인 📈 퀀티넘 (+85) 상장 후 첫 실적 예상치 상회 및 연간 전망 상향, 주가 27.97% 급등 📈 코어위브 (+80) 예상치를 웃도는 호실적 발표, AI 컴퓨팅 수요 증가로 주가 19~23% 급등 📈 SK하이

😁2

12 Aug 2026, 21:25 UTC≈1,610 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @easobi_ai

📢 Earnings Highlight COHERENT $COHR 26회계연도 4분기 실적 속보 26회계연도 4분기 실적 주요 내용 ✨ 🔹 매출: 21억 달러 (예상치 19억 9천만 달러) 🟢; 전년 동기 대비 34% 증가 🔹 조정 주당순이익(EPS): 1.74달러 (예상치 1.61달러) 🟢 🔹 매출 총이익률: 40.2%; 전년 동기 대비 215bp 증가 🔹 영업이익: 4억 4천 6백만 달러 (예상치 4억 2천 7백만 달러) 🟢; 전년 동기 대비 62.1% 증가 27회계연도 1분기 가이던스 📈 🔹 매출: 22억 달러 ~ 24억 달러 (예상치 21억 4천만 달러) 🟢 🔹 주당순이익(EPS): 1.85달러 ~ 2.05달러 (예상치 1.77달러) 🟢 🔹 총 영업비용: 4억 달러 ~ 4억 2천만 달러 🔹 매출 총이익률: 39.5% ~ 41.5%

😁3

12 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈2,000 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📝 텔레그램 심층 분석 Report (23시 03분) 기준 🌡️ 센티먼트 관망 후 긍정 (+30) 💡 요약 미국 CPI 예상치 부합으로 금리 인상 부담이 완화되고 AI/테크 기업들의 실적 호조가 시장에 긍정적인 분위기를 조성했으나, 일부 국내 기업의 악재와 지정학적 불확실성도 상존합니다. 🗣️ Top 키워드: CPI(51), 실적(27), 매출(25), 금리(21), 투자(18) 🔥 주목받는 종목 📈 네비우스 (NBIS) (+90) 2분기 매출 예상치 상회 및 전년 대비 454% 폭증, EBITDA 흑자전환 성공, MW당 4,000만~5,000만 달러 고수익 계약 체결, 2027년부터 연간 1GW 이상 신규 전력 용량 구축 가속화 📈 TSLA (Tesla) (+70) 미국 내 101억 달러 규모 태양광 공장 건설 발표, 9712명 고용

🤔2😁1

12 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈2,020 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

✅ 테슬라, 美에 101억달러 태양광 공장 짓는다…9712명 고용 '초대형 투자' 핵심은 생산 방식이다. 테슬라는 장비 계획에 잉곳 제조, 웨이퍼 제조, 코팅, 금속 배선, 인쇄 라인, 셀 테스트, 클린룸 등을 모두 포함했다. 폴리실리콘을 투입해 완성된 셀과 모듈까지 한 공장에서 생산하는 완전 수직계열화 공장을 구상한 것이다. https://www.digitaltoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=692474

😁5🤔1

12 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC≈2,570 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📝 텔레그램 심층 분석 Report (15시 07분) 기준 🌡️ 센티먼트 낙관 (+50) 💡 요약 AI 기술 도입 및 효율성 증대, 싱가포르 국부펀드 K증시 첫 투자 (삼성전자, SK하이닉스), NVIDIA의 대규모 투자 자금 조달 등으로 인한 시장 변화. 🗣️ Top 키워드: 삼성전자(272), SK하이닉스(269), 반도체(196), NVIDIA(128), AI(127) 🔥 주목받는 종목 📈 파두 (+95) 해외 Nand Flash Memory 공급 계약 체결, 단기차입금 증가 결정 (재무 부담) 📈 삼성전자 (+80) NVIDIA의 대규모 투자 자금 조달, 싱가포르 국부펀드 K증시 첫 투자 (삼성전자, SK하이닉스), AI 기술 도입 및 효율성 증대 📈 SK하이닉스 (+80) NVIDIA의 대규모 투자 자금 조달, 싱가포르 국부펀드

😁2

12 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC≈2,300 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📝 텔레그램 심층 분석 Report (11시 05분) 기준 🌡️ 센티먼트 환호 (+65) 💡 요약 화장품 및 AI 관련 기술주의 실적 호조와 신규 투자 소식에 힘입어 전반적으로 긍정적인 시장 분위기를 형성하고 있습니다. 특히 반도체 분야도 긍정적입니다. 🗣️ Top 키워드: 실리콘투(11), 한국콜마(10), 코스메카코리아(5), 화장품(5), AI(11) 🔥 주목받는 종목 📈 실리콘투 (+100) 2026 2Q 잠정실적 컨센서스 상회 (매출 4,026억, 52% YoY 성장), 실적 발표 후 주가 급등 (+12.61% ~ +15.48%) 및 추가 슈팅, 화장품 ETF 신고가 및 관련주 상승 📈 한국콜마 (+90) 2026 2Q 잠정실적 어닝 서프라이즈 (매출 8,613억, 예상치 +4% 상회, 18% YoY 성장), 주가 급등 (+16

😁1

12 Aug 2026, 01:54 UTC≈2,380 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @easobi_aiPhoto

🚀 실리콘투 257720 · 연결 2026 2Q 잠정실적 · 컨센 상회 구분 실적 컨센 컨센대비 매출 4,026억 3,807억 +6% 영업익 830억 713억 +16% 순익 723억 432억 +67% 🔗 DART 공시 원문 투자 판단 참고용 · 데이터: 액시즈 대시보드 🖌 서화백의그림놀이 ✉️ https://t.me/easobi 🖌 서화백의AI놀이 ✉️ https://t.me/easobi_ai 🖌 액시즈의대시보드 ✉️ https://dashboard.camelresearch.com

😁2

11 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC≈2,110 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @easobi_ai

2026년 8월 11일 글로벌 마감 시황 브리핑 📈📉 2026년 8월 11일 뉴욕 증시는 다우존스 산업평균지수가 0.34% 하락한 53791.85, 나스닥 종합지수가 0.60% 하락한 26466.47, S&P 500 지수가 0.32% 하락한 7728.20으로 마감하며 일제히 하락세를 보였습니다. 장 초반 잠잠한 흐름을 보였으나, 유가 상승과 대형 기술주들의 약세, 그리고 익일 발표될 7월 소비자물가지수(CPI)에 대한 경계감이 확산되며 점진적으로 하락 폭을 키웠습니다. 전반적으로 대형 기술주들이 시장 하락을 주도한 가운데, 상대적으로 중소형주는 견조한 흐름을 나타내며 시장 내부의 이중적인 모습을 보였습니다. 📊 섹터별 동향: 에너지와 유틸리티 섹터는 각각 1.1% 상승하며 가장 좋은 성과를 기록했습니다. 에너지 섹터는 유가 반등에 힘입었으

😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @easobi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 102,246 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“서화백의 그림놀이 🚀” (@easobi), 23,903 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/easobi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.