Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

주식클라쓰_하창봉👍

@sharpha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,036subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001399999791
TypeChannel
Username@sharpha
Description기억해야할 이슈/뉴스/자료 DB용도입니다/검색기능을 활용해서 지난자료도 검색가능//
CreatedBetween 1 May 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sharpha

Growth

9,0259,0369,030.57 August 2026 — 9,025 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,025 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,027 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,036 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,023–9,038 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 18:179,036+9
8 Aug 2026, 09:329,027+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:319,025no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:279,025first reading

Engagement

122 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.8%
avg views ÷ 9,036 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,060
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
122
of 122 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 120 of 122 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held122 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total251,574
Reactions total4,352
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19,500
Videos
92
Links
21,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,352 reactions across 120 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,41132.4%
👍1,32530.4%
🙏82318.9%
👏2245.15%
1844.23%
🤣1192.73%
🤩952.18%
💯892.05%
😁821.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 122 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,352reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC728 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @EMchina

~ 12일(현지시간) 튀르키예 국영 아나돌루 통신은 파키스탄 정부 소식통을 인용해 “미국과 이란이 중재국인 파키스탄에 휴전 연장 승인 의사를 전달했으며, 정확한 연장 시한을 두고 추가 협의를 진행 중”이라고 보도했다 ~ 그러나 이란 측은 해당 보도를 즉각 반박했다. 로이터 통신에 따르면 이란 고위 소식통은 “미국과의 사이에서 휴전 연장에 관한 논의는 전혀 없다”며 “시작된 휴전 날짜 자체가 없으므로 연장할 것도 없다”고 밝혔다 https://n.news.naver.com/article/025/0003544005?sid=104

👍14🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC735 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kwusa

제목 : 슈퍼 마이크로 컴퓨터, 이익률 크게 상승하며 관심 가져야 - 니덤 외 *연합인포맥스* 니덤의 N. Quinn Bolton 애널리스트는 슈퍼 마이크로 컴퓨터(NAS: SMCI) 실적발표에서 핵심적인 성장지표들이 강력했다고 강조했다. “슈퍼 마이크로 컴퓨터 실적발표에서는 매출이 컨센서스를 하회했지만, 매출총이익률 개선을 중심으로 순이익이 우수하게 나타났다. 또한 경영진은 앞으로의 매출 및 EPS 가이던스를 컨센서스보다 크게 높은 수준으로 제시했다”고 언급했다. “600억 달러에 달하는 수주잔고는 슈퍼 마이크로 컴퓨터의 성장여력을 낙관할 수 있는 근거가 된다”고 강조하면서, “이번 실적발표에서는매출이 저조했으나,

👍3🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC≈1,090 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

지금 SK하이닉스 삼성전자보다 약해보이는데는 노조부문이 수문위로 오른것도 있을것.........괜히 현재 움직이는 주가만 보고 올핸 삼성전자다 이런 썸네일로 현혹하지말지어다....................... 편가르기가 큰 기회를 놓칠수도있고..주식은 내가 보는것보다 보이지않는것을 남들은 더 많이 볼수있다.......... https://www.fnnews.com/news/202608090815074854

👍184🙏4

12 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC≈1,210 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

걱정도 가지가지......... https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/2613671?trc=right_hot_news

😁184

12 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC≈1,530 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🙏338👍5

12 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,790 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🙏26👍63

12 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,890 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

딸라도 떨어지고

🤩30👍1043

12 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,920 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍217🤩2

12 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,910 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍24🙏43

12 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC≈2,140 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

주거비(Services/Shelter): CPI에서 가장 큰 비중을 차지하는 항목으로, 연간 +3.2% 상승하며 서비스 물가의 상승 압력이 여전히 유지되고 있음을 보여줍니다. 다만 6~7월 전월 대비 상승률이 +0.1%로 낮아져 향후 둔화 가능성을 나타내고 있습니다.

45👍3

12 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈2,150 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍2814🙏5

Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @sharpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 951,143 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“주식클라쓰_하창봉👍” (@sharpha), 9,036 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharpha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.