Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AWAKE - 마켓 브리핑

@awake_schedule

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,097subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001688723636
TypeChannel
Username@awake_schedule
Description시장의 핵심만을 간결하게 정리하여 알려드립니다. 공유를 원하는 증시 및 개별종목 일정이 있다면 아래 링크로 알려주세요 https://t.me/awakeplus 채널 내 모든 자료는 참고용이며 투자권유나 추천이 아닙니다. 자동 생성 컨텐츠가 대부분이라 오류 등이 있을 수 있습니다.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/awake_schedule

Growth

17,09517,10117,0987 August 2026 — 17,096 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,100 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,098 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,100 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,099 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,101 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,095 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,097 subscribers17,0977 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,094–17,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:1817,097+2
11 Aug 2026, 22:4217,095-6
11 Aug 2026, 01:4817,101+2
10 Aug 2026, 01:2317,099-1
9 Aug 2026, 02:3117,100+2
7 Aug 2026, 23:2817,098-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:2417,100+4
7 Aug 2026, 01:4817,096first reading

Engagement

134 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.98%
avg views ÷ 17,097 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
134 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
134
of 134 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 57 of 134 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held134 (7 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total159,962
Reactions total114
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,550
Videos
14
Links
12,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 57 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6456.1%
👍5043.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 134 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC389 viewsread 13 August 2026

#우주항공 [+29.9%] 아주IB투자 [+20.1%] 미래에셋벤처투자 [ +9.1%] LK삼양 [ +7.3%] 덕산하이메탈 [ +6.6%] 나라스페이스테크놀로지 [ +6.5%] 켄코아에어로스페이스 [ +5.9%] 센서뷰 ..... 2026-08-13 09:31 🔍 실시간 주도주 확인

13 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC404 viewsread 13 August 2026

✅️ 아주IB투자 : +29.9% 상승 중 현재주가 : 4,585원 시가총액 : 5,555억 - 스페이스X 상장 추진 소식 및 관련 테마 부각. - 미국 바이오기업 투자에서의 잭팟 성과 기대감. - 글로벌 유니콘 기업 투자 결실로 인한 실적 턴어라운드 가속 전망. 프로그램 매매 : +21억 (2026-08-13 09:31) 회사정보 : https://finance.naver.com/item/main.naver?code=027360

13 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC372 viewsread 13 August 2026

#금융/지주/밸류업 [ +9.8%] 빅솔론 [ +9.0%] SK스퀘어 [ +8.3%] 한화생명 [ +7.7%] DB하이텍 [ +7.1%] 미래에셋증권 [ +5.2%] 동원산업 [ +4.7%] 한화손해보험 ..... 2026-08-13 09:31 🔍 실시간 주도주 확인

13 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC322 viewsread 13 August 2026

#반도체/소부장 [+17.5%] 미래산업 [ +9.9%] 티에프이 [ +9.0%] SK스퀘어 [ +7.7%] DB하이텍 [ +7.7%] SK하이닉스 [ +7.5%] 싸이맥스 [ +6.6%] 후성 ..... 2026-08-13 09:31 🔍 실시간 주도주 확인

13 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC321 viewsread 13 August 2026

✅️ SK스퀘어 : +9.2% 상승 중 현재주가 : 1,116,000원 시가총액 : 147.5조 - SK하이닉스 지분 가치 상승과 실적 개선 기대감. - SK하이닉스의 미국 ADR 상장 임박으로 인한 재평가 기대. - 자사주 소각을 통한 주주가치 증대 호재. 프로그램 매매 : -207억 (2026-08-13 09:31) 회사정보 : https://finance.naver.com/item/main.naver?code=402340

13 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC298 viewsread 13 August 2026

#데이터센터 [+18.3%] 삼화콘덴서 [+13.3%] 지엔씨에너지 [ +8.3%] 이수페타시스 [ +6.5%] 라온텍 [ +6.5%] SK이터닉스 [ +4.9%] 한양디지텍 [ +4.3%] 가비아 ..... 2026-08-13 09:30 🔍 실시간 주도주 확인

13 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC282 viewsread 13 August 2026

✅️ 지엔씨에너지 : +12.7% 상승 중 ❗️ 역사적 신고가 현재주가 : 54,600원 시가총액 : 8,932억 - 네이버와의 대규모 비상발전 공급 계약 체결 기대감. - AI 데이터센터 전력망 강화 및 관련 협약 체결 호재. - KT 데이터센터 공급 계약에 따른 긍정적 전망. 프로그램 매매 : +64억 * 최근 1개월 발간리포트 - 4건 (2026-08-13 09:30) 회사정보 : https://finance.naver.com/item/main.naver?code=119850

13 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC314 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📌 주도 섹터/테마 현황 ✅ 반도체/소부장 [상승률/거래대금] [+16.9%/ 56억] 미래산업 [ +9.9%/ 11억] 티에프이 [ +9.1%/ 1,731억] SK스퀘어 [ +7.8%/ 129억] DB하이텍 [ +7.7%/ 1.6조] SK하이닉스 ............ ✅ 금융/지주/밸류업 [상승률/거래대금] [+12.0%/ 6억] 빅솔론/ 역사적 신고가 [ +9.2%/ 374억] 한화생명 [ +9.1%/ 1,731억] SK스퀘어 [ +7.8%/ 129억] DB하이텍 [ +7.3%/ 499억] 미래에셋증권 ............ ✅ 기판/전자부품 [상승률/거래대금] [+18.9%/ 1,150억] 삼화콘덴서 [+12.5%/ 4,284억] 삼성전기 [ +8.4%/ 175억] 이수페타시스 [ +7.7%/ 261억] 대덕전자 [ +7.4

1

13 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC549 viewsread 13 August 2026

#건설/주택 [+13.3%] 금호건설 [ +9.8%] 까뮤이앤씨 [ +5.8%] 남화토건 [ +5.7%] 삼성물산 [ +4.0%] 엔알비 ..... 2026-08-13 09:16 🔍 실시간 주도주 확인

13 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC547 viewsread 13 August 2026

✅️ 금호건설 : +13.5% 상승 중 ❗️ 52주 신고가 현재주가 : 16,920원 시가총액 : 6,312억 - 호남 반도체 클러스터 투자 기대감 - 평택 고덕 민간참여사업 수주 - 장지차고지 입체화사업 수주 소식 프로그램 매매 : -57억 (2026-08-13 09:16) 회사정보 : https://finance.naver.com/item/main.naver?code=002990

13 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC516 viewsread 13 August 2026

#기판/전자부품 [+13.3%] 삼성전기 [+12.8%] 삼화콘덴서 [ +6.8%] 이수페타시스 [ +6.5%] 대덕전자 [ +5.1%] LG이노텍 [ +4.9%] 코칩 [ +3.3%] 코리아써키트 ..... 2026-08-13 09:16 🔍 실시간 주도주 확인

13 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC465 viewsread 13 August 2026

✅️ 삼성전기 : +13.1% 상승 중 현재주가 : 1,513,000원 시가총액 : 112.8조 - AI 수요 증가에 따른 MLCC 장기공급계약 확대 호재 - 2분기 어닝 서프라이즈에 따른 긍정적 실적 기대감 - MLCC 및 반도체 기판 사업의 쌍끌이 성장 전망 프로그램 매매 : +156억 * 최근 1개월 발간리포트 - 20건 Buy : 20건 목표주가 : 2,440,000원 | 최대 : 3,000,000원 업사이드 : 평균 +61.3% , 최대 +98.3% (2026-08-13 09:15) 회사정보 : https://finance.naver.com/item/main.naver?code=009150

Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @awake_schedule. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 313,003 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AWAKE - 마켓 브리핑” (@awake_schedule), 17,097 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/awake_schedule.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.