Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

석학들의 마켓 (인)사이트

@getfeed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,476subscribers

+63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001545256759
TypeChannel
Username@getfeed
Created9 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/getfeed

Growth

8,4118,4768,443.56 August 2026 — 8,413 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,411 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,433 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,476 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,401–8,486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:248,476+43
9 Aug 2026, 22:118,433+22
7 Aug 2026, 01:258,411-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:478,413first reading

Engagement

232 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.40%
avg views ÷ 8,476 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
221 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.474%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
232
of 232 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 221 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held232 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total26,191
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 232 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026

앞으로 주식,부동산 가격을 결정지을 핵심 변수 📝 핵심적 본문 요약 미국 장기국채금리가 지속 상승 중이며, 30년물은 5.2%, 10년물은 4.67%를 기록했다. 중국과 한국은 미국 국채 비중을 줄이고 금 매입을 늘리고 있다. 물가 상승으로 장기채권 매도세가 이어지며, 주식과 금 선호 현상이 나타난다. 미국 10년물 금리가 5%를 넘으면 주식과 부동산에 큰 타격이 예상된다. #재정적자유 #andree77 📜📜📜원문보기📜📜📜 ✨(In)sight 미국 10년물 국채금리 4.67%는 2007년 이후 최고 수준으로, 주식 시장의 밸류에이션에 직접적인 영향을 미친다. 과거 5% 돌파 시 나스닥 급락 사례를 고려할 때, 현재 금리 상승은 단순한 조정을 넘어 자산 배분의 패러다임 전환을 예고한다. 연준의 양적 긴축과 재정 적자 확대가 장기 금리 상

12 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC21 viewsread 12 August 2026

앞으로의 투자도 AI DC에 붙어 있어야 한다 📝 핵심적 본문 요약 AI 데이터센터 수요 급증으로 코어위브와 네비우스 등 네오클라우드 기업들의 실적이 급성장했다. 코어위브는 매출 25.8억 달러로 전년 대비 112% 증가했고, 수주잔고는 1,040억 달러에 달한다. 네비우스는 매출 5.82억 달러로 454% 급증하며 흑자 전환했다. 주요 하이퍼스케일러들의 AI 클라우드 매출 급증과 함께, 일반 기업들의 AI 활용 확산이 수요를 견인하고 있다. #갬이 #darkgd01 📜📜📜원문보기📜📜📜 ✨(In)sight AI 인프라 투자 사이클은 여전히 확장 국면에 있다. 엔비디아의 5,000억 달러 파이낸싱, BofA와 모건스탠리의 대규모 인프라 투자 계획은 자본 유입을 가속화하고 있다. 다만 SEC의 데이터센터 유동화 해석으로 자금 조달 통로가

12 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC44 viewsread 12 August 2026

보잉과 노드롭 그루먼, P-8A 및 MQ-4C 트리톤 기반 표준 유·무인 복합체계 기술 발전시켜 📝 핵심적 본문 요약 보잉과 노드롭 그루먼이 P-8A 포세이돈과 MQ-4C 트리톤 간의 유·무인 협업(MUM-T) 시연을 성공적으로 완료했다. 양사는 개방형 미션 시스템(OMS)과 범용 지휘통제 인터페이스(UCI)를 적용하여 기계 간 임무 부여와 협조적 해상 작전이 가능함을 입증했다. 이 기술 협력은 플랫폼 간 통합을 가속화하고 비용 효율성을 높일 것으로 기대된다. #ruffino #orangeshirts 📜📜📜원문보기📜📜📜 ✨(In)sight 보잉과 노드롭 그루먼의 MUM-T 시연은 방산 시장에서 개방형 아키텍처의 확산을 시사한다. 경쟁사인 록히드 마틴이 폐쇄형 체계를 고수하는 반면, 이번 협력은 OMS/UCI 표준을 통해 상호운용성을 강

12 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC38 viewsread 12 August 2026

7월 CPI 3.4% 발표: 연준 금리 인상 멈출까? 📝 핵심적 본문 요약 7월 CPI 상승률은 전년 대비 3.4%로 6월의 3.5%보다 소폭 하락했다. 근원 물가는 전월 대비 0.2%, 전년 대비 2.5% 상승하며 완화 흐름을 보였다. 휘발유 가격은 중동 평화 협상 가능성으로 전월 대비 2.9% 하락했지만, 전년 대비 25% 높은 수준이다. 주거비는 전월과 동일한 0.1% 상승에 그쳐 에너지 하락분을 상쇄했다. 트럼프 행정부의 관세와 이란 전쟁, AI 인프라 비용 상승이 물가 상방 압력으로 작용한다. 연준은 9월 금리 동결 확률을 58%로 반영하며 인상 가능성을 낮게 본다. #energyinfo #energyinfo 📜📜📜원문보기📜📜📜 ✨(In)sight 최근 소비자물가지수 상승률 둔화는 투자 심리에 긍정적 신호다. 특히 근원 물가

12 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTCviews —

석학들의 마켓 (인)사이트 pinned «미국과 중국의 희토류 전쟁 근황 📝 핵심적 본문 요약 미국 광산업계 라운드테이블에서 MP머티리얼즈가 GM용 네오디뮴 자석을 공개했다. 이 자석은 100% 미국산이나 중희토류 디스프로슘은 중국산이다. 미국은 희토류 자석 의존도를 낮추기 위해 질화철 자석 개발에도 투자하고 있다. 한편 중국은 MP 등을 블랙리스트에 올리고 세컨더리 보이콧을 선언했다. #메르 #ranto28 📜📜📜원문보기📜📜📜 ✨(In)sight ※우라가 오지 않으면 그것은 인사이트가…»

12 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC49 viewsread 12 August 2026

미국과 중국의 희토류 전쟁 근황 📝 핵심적 본문 요약 미국 광산업계 라운드테이블에서 MP머티리얼즈가 GM용 네오디뮴 자석을 공개했다. 이 자석은 100% 미국산이나 중희토류 디스프로슘은 중국산이다. 미국은 희토류 자석 의존도를 낮추기 위해 질화철 자석 개발에도 투자하고 있다. 한편 중국은 MP 등을 블랙리스트에 올리고 세컨더리 보이콧을 선언했다. #메르 #ranto28 📜📜📜원문보기📜📜📜 ✨(In)sight ※우라가 오지 않으면 그것은 인사이트가 아니다. ※※※채널 내 모든 내용은 부정확할 가능성 있고, 투자책임 없음. 최종 판단은 직접 하시오.※※※

12 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC69 viewsread 12 August 2026

📈 요즘 많이 보는 리포트 TOP 10 2026-08-12 23:59 기준 🏆. 삼성전자, 공급과 수요 모두 변화 / HBM 시장 점유율 확대 예상 현대차증권(2026. 08. 05.) [링크] 조회수: 38,769 🥈. SK하이닉스, 변화된 공급구조에 주목 / Blended는 Premium이 견인 현대차증권(2026. 08. 05.) [링크] 조회수: 35,566 🥉. 삼성전자, 비중확대의 적기 미래에셋증권(2026. 08. 11.) [링크] 조회수: 18,527 🎖️. SK하이닉스, 역사적 업적의 연속 미래에셋증권(2026. 08. 11.) [링크] 조회수: 15,124 ✋. 삼성전기, [NDR 후기] 수급 불안을 먹고 자라는 중 하나증권(2026. 08. 11.) [링크] 조회수: 10,672 6️⃣. 카카오, 목표대

12 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC69 viewsread 12 August 2026

[Visualcapitalist] 미국에서 임금 격차가 가장 큰 주 순위 Ranked: U.S. States With the Widest Wage Gaps 내용 없음 Discover which U.S. states have the widest wage gaps, based on 2025 BLS data comparing top earners with median workers. 📜📜📜본문보기📜📜📜

12 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC86 viewsread 12 August 2026

[박홍기 작가 TV 삶 테크] "통계대로 터졌다…강남 빌딩 화재가 예측한 8월 추가 화재 가능성" 📀📀📀영상보기📀📀📀

12 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC113 viewsread 12 August 2026

[작업중이양] [펩트론] 우주의 기운이 몰린다, 소수계좌 투자주의 의미? 📀📀📀영상보기📀📀📀

12 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC217 viewsread 12 August 2026

조선왕릉 옆 6800호 아파트 가시화…“태릉 개발해도 가치 그대로” https://n.news.naver.com/article/028/0002818172 사관학교 이전하면 거기도 주택공급 가시화 되나

12 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC215 viewsread 12 August 2026

[Visualcapitalist] Here is the translation of the text in brackets:**Ranked: World Currencies vs. the U.S. Dollar in 2026** Ranked: World Currencies vs. the U.S. Dollar in 2026 콜롬비아는 2026년 미국 달러 대비 통화 강세를 주도한 반면, 아르헨티나와 여러 주요 아시아 통화는 가장 약세 통화에 이름을 올렸다. Colombia leads currency gains against the U.S. dollar in 2026, while Argentina and several major Asian currencies rank among the weakest. 📜📜📜본문보기📜📜📜

Showing the 12 most recent of 232 posts we hold for @getfeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 289,594 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“석학들의 마켓 (인)사이트” (@getfeed), 8,476 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/getfeed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.