📌 신고가 종목 현황(2026-11-11기준) ✅ 기판/전자부품 (종목수 : 1) [상승률] 종목명 [+18.3%] 타이거일렉(역사적) ✅ 보안 (종목수 : 2) [상승률] 종목명 [ +8.8%] 안랩(52주) [ +3.6%] 지니언스(역사적) ✅ 조선/에너지 (종목수 : 2) [상승률] 종목명 [ +2.8%] 삼성E&A(역사적) [ +0.3%] 디케이락(52주) https://www.awakeplus.co.kr/board/sin/639
❤4

Channel
@awake_realtimeCheck
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,874subscribers
+691 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001771079971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @awake_realtimeCheck |
| Description | 52주 신고가 및 최대 거래량 갱신 종목 정보를 모바일에서 한눈에 쉽게 확인할 수 있는 채널 - 잠재 오버행, - 최근 리포트발간 내역 - 자사주 보유/매입/소각 내역 등 - 최근 주요공시(시설투자,공급계약,지분...) - IPO 보호예수 - 분할,증자 등 일정 실시간 뉴스 요약 및 산업/테마일정도 추가예정입니다. 봇에 의해 생성된 정보이며, 매수/매도 의견이 아니라는 점 반드시 확인바랍니다. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/awake_realtimeCheck |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @awake_realtimeCheck/62155 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC | @awake_schedule/1732810 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @awake_realtimeCheck/62361 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 02:22 UTC | @awake_schedule/1749414 Aug 2026, 02:22 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @awake_realtimeCheck/62453 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC | @awake_schedule/1756919 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @awake_realtimeCheck/62528 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC | @awake_schedule/1765621 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @awake_realtimeCheck/62656 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC | @awake_schedule/1778726 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @awake_realtimeCheck/62745 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC | @awake_schedule/1788728 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @awake_schedule | 87 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (86–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 595 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 01:38 | 22,874 | -8 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:01 | 22,882 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:59 | 22,883 | +2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:34 | 22,881 | +4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:19 | 22,877 | +5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:19 | 22,872 | +2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:49 | 22,870 | +7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:54 | 22,863 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:39 | 22,869 | +6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:09 | 22,863 | +13 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 22,850 | +5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:26 | 22,845 | +7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 22,838 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 22,844 | +7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 22,837 | +1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:48 | 22,836 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 22,841 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 22,840 | +8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:21 | 22,832 | +6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:05 | 22,826 | first reading |
1,028 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 108 of 288 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,028 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 467,436 |
| Reactions total | 162 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
461 reactions across 263 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 335 | 72.7% | |
| 👍 | 80 | 17.4% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 6.94% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 3.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 304 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 461 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 288 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📌 신고가 종목 현황(2026-11-11기준) ✅ 기판/전자부품 (종목수 : 1) [상승률] 종목명 [+18.3%] 타이거일렉(역사적) ✅ 보안 (종목수 : 2) [상승률] 종목명 [ +8.8%] 안랩(52주) [ +3.6%] 지니언스(역사적) ✅ 조선/에너지 (종목수 : 2) [상승률] 종목명 [ +2.8%] 삼성E&A(역사적) [ +0.3%] 디케이락(52주) https://www.awakeplus.co.kr/board/sin/639
❤4
✅ 역사적 신고가 종목 타이거일렉(시가총액 : 6,763억) 현재가격 : 107,100원(+18.3%) 거래대금 : 81억 - - HBM 수요 확대에 따른 PCB 수요 증가로 인한 성장 기대감. - 판가 인상과 고부가 제품 확대에 따른 수익성 개선 전망. 에스텍(시가총액 : 2,162억) 현재가격 : 19,820원(+30.0%) 거래대금 : 12억 - - 일본 포스타전기의 에스텍 공개매수 후 상장폐지 소식에 따른 주목. - 차량용 스피커 및 전장모듈 등 고부가가치 제품의 지속적인 수요 증가 전망. 유니퀘스트(시가총액 : 2,640억) 현재가격 : 12,220원(+14.8%) 거래대금 : 67억 - - 온디바이스 AI 테마 상승세에 따른 반도체 솔루션 수요 증가 기대감. - AI 인프라 공급사로의 전환을 통한 시장 내 경쟁력 강화 전망. …
❤4
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 신고가 괴리율 낮은 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 괄호()안은 신고가와 남은 거리임 - 복수투표 가능
The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 당일 신규 신고가 돌파 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 - 복수투표 가능
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 심텍홀딩스(+29.31%) - 반도체 기판(FC-BGA/PCB/MLB 등) 테마 상승세에 따른 수혜 기대감. - 자회사 심텍의 실적 회복과 AI 기판 수요 증가 전망. 📊 최근실적(매출/영업익/순익) 2026.2Q 5,582억/ 576억/ 301억 2026.1Q 4,432억/ 10억/ 2억 2025.4Q 4,376억/ 37억/ -893억 2025.3Q 3,981억/ 25억/ 25억 회사정보 : https://finance.naver.com/item/main.naver?code=036710
✅ 심텍홀딩스(+29.31%) ❗️ 52주 최대 거래량 돌파 거래대금 : 249억 시가총액 : 2,657억 - 현재가 : 5,030원 (2026-11-11 14:45 기준)
👍1
📌 당일 장중 외국인 수급(잠정) 정리 ✅ 순매수 : 삼성전자, SK하이닉스, 동원파츠, 한미약품, 아시아나IDT, 태성, 광진실업 ✅ 순매도 : 지니언스, 한화에어로스페이스, 한진칼우, 바로팜, 루닛, 삼익제약, 한진칼
📌 당일 장중 기관수급(잠정) 정리 ✅ 순매수 : RFHIC, 나노신소재, 케이씨텍, 브이엠, 이수페타시스, 대주전자재료, 샘씨엔에스 ✅ 순매도 : 바로팜, 한양디지텍, 루닛, 현대해상, 에이피알, 파두, 하이젠알앤엠
✅ 타이거일렉(+14.81%) - HBM 수요 확대에 따른 검사 기판 수요 증가 기대감. - 판가 인상과 고부가 제품 확대에 따른 구조적 수익성 개선 전망. * 증권사 보고서(최근 1개월) - 7건 2026-11-10 [메리츠증권]양승수 - 투자의견 : Buy신규 / 목표가 : 120,000원(신규) - 범상치 않은 성장의 시작(6페이지) 2026-11-02 [IBK투자증권]이건재 - 투자의견 : Buy신규 / 목표가 : 108,000원(신규) - 복잡해지는 반도체, 높아지는 PCB의 가치(8페이지) 2026-10-26 [메리츠증권]양승수 - 투자의견 : --(-) - 호랑이 앞에 차려진 진수성찬(8페이지) ..... 📊 최근실적(매출/영업익/순익) 2026.3Q 352억/ 80억/ 63억(E) 2026.2Q 335억/…
✅ 타이거일렉(+14.81%) ❗️ 52주 신고가 다시 돌파 거래대금 : 40억 시가총액 : 6,561억 - 현재가 : 103,900원 (2026-11-11 13:39 기준)
✅ 진에어(+4.63%) - 유가 하락에 따른 항공주의 부각으로 투자심리 개선 전망. - 기관의 매수세 유입에 따른 긍정적 투자 신호. * 신규시설투자내역 2025-06-17 신규시설투자 / 항공기 운항훈련장비(213억) - 기재 도입 계획에 따른 항공기 운항훈련장비 확보 2026-08-07 신규시설투자 / 항공기 14대 리스(7,071억) - 장기 기재 계획에 따른 기재 확보 * 기업설명회(IR)개최 ❗️2026-11-12 --:-- - 2026년 3분기 실적 설명 * 증권사 보고서(최근 1개월) - 7건 2026-11-10 [하나증권]안도현 - 투자의견 : Buy유지 / 목표가 : 7,000원(유지) - LCC에게도 통합이 좋다(4페이지) 2026-11-10 [NH투자증권]정연승 - 투자의견 : Buy유지 / 목표가…
✅ 진에어(+4.63%) ❗️ 52주 신고가 돌파를 이어가는 중 거래대금 : 495억 시가총액 : 4,364억 - 현재가 : 8,360원 (2026-11-11 12:43 기준)
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,028 posts we hold for @awake_realtimeCheck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 82 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 신고가 괴리율 낮은 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 괄호()안은 신고가와 남은 거리임 - 복수투표 가능
The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 당일 신규 신고가 돌파 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 - 복수투표 가능
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 신고가 괴리율 낮은 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 괄호()안은 신고가와 남은 거리임 - 복수투표 가능
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 당일 신규 신고가 돌파 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 - 복수투표 가능
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 신고가 괴리율 낮은 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 괄호()안은 신고가와 남은 거리임 - 복수투표 가능
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 당일 신규 신고가 돌파 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 - 복수투표 가능
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AWAKE - 52주 신고가 모니터링” (@awake_realtimeCheck), 22,874 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/awake_realtimeCheck.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.