미국인들은 이제 1년 후 실업률이 지금보다 높을 확률이 45.3%라고 보고 있습니다. 뉴욕 연방준비은행에 따르면 이는 팬데믹 이후 최고치입니다.
❤1😱1

Channel
@teamctrine
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,436subscribers
+2,085 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001707013014 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @teamctrine |
| Description | 이것 저것 올립니다 문의 : @ctrine_mong (코인광고/레퍼럴 문의는 받지 않습니다.) |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/teamctrine |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 22:15 | 8,436 | +217 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:25 | 8,219 | +76 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:37 | 8,143 | +31 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:50 | 8,112 | +24 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:49 | 8,088 | +16 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:16 | 8,072 | +43 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 8,029 | +70 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:31 | 7,959 | +21 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 08:59 | 7,938 | +78 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 07:08 | 7,860 | +36 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 7,824 | +19 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:15 | 7,805 | +66 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 7,739 | +139 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 7,600 | +166 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 7,434 | +84 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 7,350 | +76 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 7,274 | +95 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 7,179 | +19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 7,160 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 7,156 | first reading |
290 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 142 of 159 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 290 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 413,067 |
| Reactions total | 788 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 00:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,644 reactions across 236 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 619 | 37.7% | |
| 😱 | 442 | 26.9% | |
| 😁 | 123 | 7.48% | |
| 🤔 | 119 | 7.24% | |
| 👍 | 118 | 7.18% | |
| 🤣 | 70 | 4.26% | |
| 🔥 | 62 | 3.77% | |
| 👀 | 51 | 3.10% | |
| 🫡 | 22 | 1.34% | |
| 🙏 | 18 | 1.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 261 of the 290 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,809 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 290 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @teamctrine. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 290 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 159 posts held from the last 30 days (2.52%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
미국인들은 이제 1년 후 실업률이 지금보다 높을 확률이 45.3%라고 보고 있습니다. 뉴욕 연방준비은행에 따르면 이는 팬데믹 이후 최고치입니다.
❤1😱1
이란 전쟁으로 전 세계 석유 비축량이 수년 만에 최저 수준으로 떨어졌습니다. 이제 고갈된 비축량을 보충하고 다음 공급 충격에 대비한 저장 시설을 건설하기 위한 경쟁이 시작되었습니다.
❤1
모건 스탠리: 현재 주가 835달러에 매출의 50% 수준까지 자사주 매입을 고려하고 있는 샌디스크를 주목해 보겠습니다. 샌디스크는 2028년 말까지 회사 지분의 50% 이상을 매입할 수 있습니다. 저희는 거품이 낀 수치에 기반한 높은 배수를 지불하기보다는 현재의 사이클을 기준으로 기업 가치를 평가하는 것을 선호합니다. 주가가 하락하는 시점이 바로 그러한 관점이라고 생각합니다. 현재 수준에서 샌디스크와 마이크론 모두 비슷한 수준으로 긍정적으로 평가합니다.
❤4
CME FedWatch는 현재 금리가 현행 수준을 유지할 확률을 0.0%, 25bp 인상 확률을 약 90%, 50bp 인상 확률을 약 10%로 반영하고 있습니다. 이제 시장의 유일한 관심사는 인상 폭이 얼마나 될 것인가입니다.
반도체 EPS 하락은 "정책 변화가 2027년 하반기 자본 지출 완화로 이어질 경우 1분기부터 시작될 수 있습니다. 2027년 AI 자본 지출이 20% 감소하는 시나리오에서 AI 반도체 EPS는 35~40% 이상 하락할 것으로 예상됩니다. 이것만으로도 2027년 S&P 500 EPS가 7~8% 감소할 것입니다."
❤1😱1
믿어봅니다
🤣5❤1
SpaceX ( $SPCX )는 2025년에 약 2.2일마다 Falcon 9를 발사했습니다.
😱1
씨티그룹 전략가들은 AI 논란 이후 미국 주식 투자의견을 하향 조정하고 유럽 주식 투자의견을 상향 조정했습니다.
❤1
이란에 대한 관심이 집중되는 가운데 유가가 2020년 이후 최대 주간 하락세를 이어가고 있다
❤1
나스닥은 1996년부터 2000년까지 다섯 차례 조정을 겪었으며, 1998년의 하락폭이 가장 컸다(-26%)
❤4
지난주 비트코인 ETF는 12억 8,170만 달러의 자금을 잃어 6월 말 이후 최대 주간 순유출을 기록했습니다. 이 순유출액의 거의 대부분은 블랙록의 IBIT(12억 950만 달러)에서 발생했는데, 이는 매도세가 다른 비트코인 ETF에 분산되기보다는 가장 큰 규모의 펀드에 집중되었음을 보여줍니다.
❤3😁1
르네상스 테크놀로지스가 무려 71억 달러 규모의 신규 매수 포지션을 구축했습니다. 레드와이어, 오로라 이노베이션, 유아이패스, 버진 갤럭틱부터 하이퍼리퀴드 전략 관련 종목까지 공격적으로 편입했습니다. AI·우주항공·자동화·크립토 등 미래 성장 산업 전반에 과감하게 베팅하는 모습입니다. 단순히 시장을 추종하는 것이 아니라 다음 성장 사이클의 주도권을 선점하려는 움직임인지 주목할 필요가 있겠습니다.
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 290 posts we hold for @teamctrine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 90 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CTRINE” (@teamctrine), 8,436 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teamctrine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.