Channel
@Jstockclass
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,513subscribers
+858 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001514595150 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Jstockclass |
| Created | 11 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Jstockclass |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Jstockclass/15236 · this entry14 Oct 2026, 23:52 UTC | @kimcharger/1431414 Oct 2026, 23:52 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Jstockclass/15291 · this entry23 Oct 2026, 13:33 UTC | @kimcharger/1439023 Oct 2026, 23:39 UTC | 1.00 | 10 hours |
| @Jstockclass/15306 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 22:08 UTC | @kimcharger/1439826 Oct 2026, 22:28 UTC | 1.00 | 20 minutes |
| @Jstockclass/15314 · this entry28 Oct 2026, 22:07 UTC | @kimcharger/1441728 Oct 2026, 22:09 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @Jstockclass/15368 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 06:33 UTC | @kimcharger/144592 Nov 2026, 06:55 UTC | 1.00 | 22 minutes |
| @Jstockclass/15405 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 08:19 UTC | @free_life59/540344 Nov 2026, 08:28 UTC | 1.00 | 8 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @kimcharger | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3 minutes | this entry (9–1) |
| @cahier_de_market | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 16 minutes | this entry (14–1) |
| @Yeouido_Lab | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 13 minutes | this entry (11–4) |
| @free_life59 | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 16 minutes | this entry (6–0) |
| @bornlupin | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 9 minutes | this entry (9–3) |
| @umbrellaresearch | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 11 minutes | this entry (7–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 263 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 12:46 | 26,513 | -2 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:39 | 26,515 | -6 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:19 | 26,521 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:01 | 26,522 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:46 | 26,524 | +59 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:39 | 26,465 | +18 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:10 | 26,447 | +19 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:26 | 26,428 | +14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:17 | 26,414 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 26,412 | -1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:45 | 26,413 | +6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 26,407 | +4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 26,403 | +10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:28 | 26,393 | +38 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 26,355 | +7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:41 | 26,348 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:00 | 26,344 | +12 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:35 | 26,332 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:51 | 26,331 | +8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 26,323 | first reading |
378 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 146 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 378 (2 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,044,230 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 06:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 182 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
CoreWeave : 신규 계약 경제성과 자금조달 가시성, 주가 리레이팅의 첫걸음 (GS) 1. 3Q26 실적 및 4Q 가이던스 • 매출 $3,661mn (컨센서스 대비 +3%, GSe 대비 +4%), 전년 대비 +168% • 영업이익 $379mn, 마진 10%로 컨센서스 대비 약 350bp 상회 • CapEx(금융리스 포함) $14.5bn, 컨센서스 $12.1bn 대비 높음 • FCF –$7.5bn으로 컨센서스(–$9.1bn)보다 양호 • 4Q 암묵적 가이던스: 매출 +3%, 마진 +100bp 상회, CapEx 22% 하회 2. 자금조달 계획 구체화 • 2027년까지 추가 모회사 레벨 무담보 부채 발행 없음 • 잔여 자금 수요 대부분을 DDTL로 조달 (CapEx의 70~100% 커버, 금리 7~10%) • 보조 수단: 고…
코스피, 외국인 순매수 전환..
엔터/미디어/레저: 약속의 홀수 해가 온다 (하나) 1. 섹터 개요 • 2027년 대부분 섹터가 사상 최대 실적 전망이나 밸류에이션은 역사적 저평가 • 엔터는 하이브(BTS 추가 활동, 미국 신인 남자 그룹), 레저는 하나투어(2년 연속 이연 수요와 원화 강세 수혜)가 최선호 • YG는 상반기 신인 남녀 그룹 데뷔, 파라다이스는 리젠시 턴어라운드와 관광진흥개발기금 법안 발의 시 불확실성 해소가 포인트 2. 엔터: 4대 기획사 모두 신인 남자 그룹 데뷔 • 주요 IP 컴백 선반영 후 일시적 성장 둔화로 한한령/노재팬 수준의 저평가까지 하락 • 2027년 상반기 4대 기획사 모두 신인 남자 아이돌 데뷔 예정 • 코르티스 앨범 판매량 400만장 돌파 등 경쟁 구도에 긍정적 • 2028년 세븐틴 완전체 컴백으로 산업 사상 최대 이익 …
테라팹, 상상이 발주로 바뀌는 순간 (한화) 1. 칩 생산 성공 여부와 무관하게 건설은 이미 시작 • 첨단 로직·메모리·패키징 통합 생산체계를 단기간에 구축하기는 어려워 실현 가능성 의문은 여전 • 다만 제조기술의 성공 여부와 실제 시설투자는 구분해야 함 • Tesla는 Giga Texas에서 R&D 시설 Austin Fab을 건설 중이며, Grimes County에서도 부지 조성과 초기 건설이 진행 중 • 테라팹은 계획이 아닌 실제 진행 중인 프로젝트 2. 한국·일본 소부장과 구체적 공급 협의 시작, 2027년부터 매출 가능 • 2026년 SEMICON West에서 Tesla·SpaceX 관계자가 국내 소부장 업체 약 10곳과 접촉했다는 보도 • 일부와는 비밀유지계약 및 샘플 공급 논의 진행 • 11월 9일 보도: 테라팹 조달…
* 코어위브 컨콜 중 (수요 및 위험 관련) 2027년까지 공급 가능한 용량이 대부분 판매 완료됐으며, 지금까지 판매 대상으로 내놓은 2028년 공급분도 모두 판매됐다. 구매 요건을 충족한 수요(qualified demand)는 2027년까지 가용 공급능력의 10배에 달하며, 2028년 수요도 이미 공급량의 몇 배 수준. 2027년 공급 일정에 차질을 빚을 만한 중대한 위험은 없는 것으로 보고 있음. https://x.com/wallstengine/status/2120288491817042281?a=UfpGzY5AYO2nPKV9Nvs&s=19
TrendForce Bull·Bear 논의: 최소 2027년까지 메모리 성장 지속 (Bofa) 1. TrendForce 콜 핵심 내용 • 2028년 하락 사이클 없음, 2027년 강한 사이클 전망 • 4Q26 ASP: DRAM/HBM 전분기 대비 10~20% 상승, NAND 8~13% 상승 • 2027년 HBM 가격 2배 이상 상승 전망 • 삼성전자 HBM 위상이 SK하이닉스보다 우위 (HBM4 가격·점유율) • CXMT의 DRAM 공급 영향은 제한적, YMTC NAND 증설은 빠름 (수년 내 삼성 수준 가능) • 미국 AIDC는 2027년 순항 전망이나 텍사스 일부 지연·취소 가능 • 소비자·중국 수요 약화 시 NAND 가격 조정이 2Q27~3Q27로 앞당겨질 수 있음 • LTA(2027년 DRAM 매출의 60~70%)가 2…
갭으로 오르는 장, 외국인은 언제 들어오나 by Jay 가정해보자. 연말까지 장이 꾸준히 오른다면, 그 장은 어떤 모습일까. 지금 시장은 낙폭과대 후 반등 국면이다. 이런 장은 완만한 계단을 그리며 올라가지 않는다. 아래에서 기다리던 매수세가 한꺼번에 몰리고, 팔 사람은 이미 팔았으니 호가가 비어버린다. 그래서 반등은 갭으로 나온다. 어제 종가와 오늘 시가 사이에 빈 공간이 생기고, 그 공간은 좀처럼 메워지지 않는다. 당분간은 이런 움직임이 반복될 가능성이 높다고 본다. 여기서 주목할 플레이어가 외국인이다. 그들의 포지션은 지금 텅텅 비어 있다. 문제는 비어 있다는 사실 자체가 부담이라는 점이다. 이미 올라버린 시장에서 한꺼번에 사자니 가격이 부담스럽고, 그렇다고 가만히 있자니 더 오를 것 같아 불안하다. 게다가 그들이 본격적으로 사…
아시아 주식 전략: 시장 왜곡과 리스크 관리 (JPM) 1. 핵심 판단 • 최근 주가는 펀더멘털보다 수급·포지셔닝에 좌우되며, 실적·뉴스 반응도 부정적으로 쏠림 • 선거 결과를 이란 리스크 완화, 재정 규율 강화, 데이터센터 증설 제약으로 해석, 이 중 마지막이 AI주 하락을 주도 • AI 테마는 여전히 강세 관점이나, 당분간 AI 반등과 비상관 기회에 모두 노출된 분산 포트폴리오 선호 2. 매크로 리스크 완화 • 9월 초부터 전술적 신중론 유지, 연준 금리 인상·장기금리·엔화 강세·유가·선거 요인이 대부분 해소 • 2027년 말 연준 금리 전망 안정, 선진국 장기금리 하락, 이란 긴장 완화로 유가 하락 3. 기술적 지표·포지셔닝·수급 • 아시아 증시 월간 약 15% 하락, 과거 2년간 바닥 구간과 일치 • 시장 전체 RSI…
• 카타르 총리와 "훌륭한 대화", 분쟁 종결을 향한 긍정적 모멘텀 • 추가 미군 행동은 "가능성 매우 낮음" • 이란 핵무기 보유 불가 입장은 재확인
Our shopping list (MS) 1. 핵심 시각 • 업종 의견 Attractive, 급락이 과도하다고 판단 • 최대 리스크는 공포 자체: 자본시장이 설비투자를 뒷받침하지 못할 경우 지출 의지 약화 가능 • 중간값 종목은 52주 고점 대비 53% 하락 (평균 48%) 2. AI 투자 사이클 진단 • 월가의 공포와 실리콘밸리의 낙관 사이 괴리가 역대 최대 수준 • 고객사 수요는 지속·가속 중이며, 풀 할당된 수주잔고에 신규 주문 유입 • "2028년 이야기"라는 우려는 지난 3년과 다르지 않은 패턴 • 2027년은 반도체 공급 부족이 지속되고, 2028년까지도 공급 제약 전망 • 부지·전력·건물(LPS) 병목은 위협이 아닌 성장 지속의 근거 • 오하이오·텍사스 등 일부 주에서 배치 지연 위험, 해외·타 주로 이동 중 …
[Morgan Stanley] 미국 중간선거 이후 AI 투자 기회: 최근 주가 조정은 과도한 반응 🔹Buy the Drop: AI Investment Opportunities Post the US Midterms (11/8) » Morgan Stanley는 미국 중간선거 이후 AI 관련주들의 주가 하락을 과도한 반응으로 평가. AI 인프라 투자 사이클의 구조적 훼손보다는 일부 데이터센터 프로젝트의 착공 지연에 그칠 것으로 전망 » 텍사스 선거 결과는 2027년 데이터센터 건설에 큰 영향을 미치지 않을 것으로 예상. 다만 신규 인허가 심사 절차로 인해 2028년 예정된 미국 데이터센터 프로젝트의 약 20%가 2029년으로 이연될 가능성 » 미국 데이터센터 건설 규모는 2027년~2028년 대체로 정체된 이후 2029년 약 40% 증가할 …
미-이란 합의 보도 요약 (알아라비야 TV, 아랍 소식통 인용) 1. 합의 골격 • 미국이 이란의 3.67% 저농축 우라늄 국내 보유를 허용했고, 이란도 수용 • 호르무즈 해협 즉시 재개방 및 해상 봉쇄 해제 2. 경제 제재 완화 • 합의 타결 시 이란 동결 자산 60~90억 달러 해제 3. 핵 프로그램 제한 • 예비 합의로 이란의 우라늄 농축 수준 축소 예상 • 미국은 60% 농축 우라늄 비축량 감축을 요구중
Showing the 12 most recent of 378 posts we hold for @Jstockclass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실” (@Jstockclass), 26,513 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jstockclass.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.