Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @아무자료 아무노래(2026년, 계급사회 가속화 3.0)

Channel

@아무자료 아무노래(2026년, 계급사회 가속화 3.0)

@anysong_Technon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,978subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001325154927
TypeChannel
Username@anysong_Technon
Created25 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/anysong_Technon

Growth

4,9784,9934,985.56 August 2026 — 4,993 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,992 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,988 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,978 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,976–4,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:174,978-10
10 Aug 2026, 14:264,988-4
7 Aug 2026, 09:374,992-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:024,993first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.75%
avg views ÷ 4,978 subscribers
Avg views / post
286
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.404%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held68 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total19,466
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1890.0%
👍15.00%
💯15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC30 viewsread 12 August 2026

‘N% 성과급’ 논란 삼전하닉 노조 뭉친다 https://www.sedaily.com/article/20078536

12 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC88 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HANAchina

>>서버 DDR5 메모리 가격 이달 15~23% 전면 상승 •3분기 메모리 제조사들의 가격 인상이 이어지면서 이달 서버용 DDR5 가격이 15-23% 상승 •32GB·64GB·96GB DDR5 RDIMM 가격은 각각 900달러·1,590달러·2,650달러까지 올랐음. 현물시장에서는 각각 1,8002,100달러·3,0003,200달러·3,800~4,100달러 수준으로 거래되고 있음 •제조사의 DDR5 공급은 여전히 수요를 충족하지 못하는 상황이지만, 계약가격이 분기마다 상승하면서 대형 서버 고객들의 메모리 비용 부담에 대한 민감도도 높아지고 있음. •장기공급계약(LTA)이 잇따라 체결되면서 대형 고객의 DDR5 공급이 일정 부분 확보된 만큼, 향후 DDR5 가격 상승폭은 점차 완만해질 전망 >《科创板日报》12日讯,随着三季度原厂价格进一步

12 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC226 viewsread 12 August 2026

12일 관계부처 등에 따르면 싱가포르 테마섹은 최근 삼성전자와 SK하이닉스에 대한 투자를 결정하고 투자 집행 시점을 타진하기 위해 한국 정부와 접촉한 것으로 확인됐다. 투자 방식은 외부 자산운용사를 통한 위탁운용이 아닌 내부 인력을 통한 직접 투자 방식을 택한 것으로 전해졌다. 금융당국 한 관계자는 "삼성전자와 SK하이닉스 주가가 최근 정부의 단일종목 레버리지 상장지수펀드(ETF) 허용 이후 극심한 변동성을 보이는 국면에서 자금 집행 시점 등을 타진하기 위해 접촉한 것으로 알고 있다"고 전했다. 테마섹이 한국 증시에 투자하는 것은 이번이 처음이다. https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/277/0005802104?sid=101

12 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC188 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @pcstfu

[FT] 미 부통령 밴스, 우크라이나에 러시아 항구 사용 유조선 공격 중단 요구 #OOTT | US VP VANCE ASKED UKRAINE TO HALT STRIKES ON TANKERS USING RUSSIAN PORT – FT 코멘트: 미국 트럼프 2기 행정부가 우크라이나의 러시아 에너지 인프라 공격을 중단시키려는 것은 러시아와의 협상에서 에너지 수출을 주요 레버리지로 활용하려는 의도로 풀이된다. 이는 전시 상황에서도 에너지 시장 안정성을 우선시하는 미국의 지정학적 계산을 반영한다. #미국 #우크라이나 #러시아 #에너지 #국제정치 (Insight: @pcstfu | Source: @marketfeed) | Disclaimer: 면책조항, 모든 메세지 확인 없고 착오가 중대하게 있음. 모든 투자 책임은 독자에게 일체 귀속됨.)

12 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC191 viewsread 12 August 2026

美, 데이터센터 자금조달 문턱 낮춘다…유동화증권 투자자보호 규제 면제 ★★ https://www.sedaily.com/article/20078122

12 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC72 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hana_us_stock

엔비디아는 다 계획이 있었나 보네요 이 뉴스도 큰 의미가 있다고 보는데요 단순히 gpu의 지수화가 아닌 금융시스템의 보완이라고 판단합니다 어제 엔비디아가 금융기관들과 컴퓨팅 금융지원 플랫폼을 발표했습니다 이것 만으로도 엔비디아의 순환금융 리스크가 해소가 된다고 생각했습니다 문제는 자금을 대출해주는 금융기관이 리스크를 안게 되는 건데요 기업이 아닌 경제나 금융시스템이란 큰 그림에서 금융기관들이 리스크를 안는 게 더 위험하죠 CME에서 선물거래가 가능하다는 건 헤지가 가능하다는 걸 시사합니다 리스크를 분산하는 겁니다 AI컴퓨팅 금융자산화를 더욱 강화하는 것으로 판단합니다 ------ [CME, AI 컴퓨팅 파워 선물 출시… GPU 임대료가 거래 가능한 자산으로] *발표 개요 -CME Group과 Silicon Data가 AI 컴퓨팅 파워

12 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC25 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cahier_de_market

* 매우 중요한 내용이 많이 나온 Cantor의 FMS 리뷰 - "비트 수요가 공급을 5~10%포인트 상회하며 이 격차가 이번 10년 내내 지속될 것"이라는 언급 - 컨센서스는 향후 2개 분기 내 메모리 가격 정점을 예상하고 있지만, 업계 관계자들과의 펀더멘털 논의는 전혀 다른 이야기를 전하고 있음 - (루빈울트라의 HBM) 디스펙과 관련해서는 투자자들이 원인을 잘못 해석하고 있음. 이는 전적으로 공급 가용성의 문제이지 수요 파괴가 아님 - HBM4 가격계약 : SK하이닉스가 엔비디아에 GB당 32달러, 브로드컴에 36달러, AMD에 40달러로 계약을 확정한 것으로 파악 - 트렌드포스는 낸드에 대해 27년 하반기부터 가격하락을 예상했는데, 그러나 Cantor의 대화는 상당히 긍정적이었고 부정적 데이터 포인트는 어디에서도 찾을 수

12 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC155 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @insiderpaperPhoto

NEW - Google’s Gemini AI assistant surpasses one billion users — it's Google's fastest growing product READ: https://insiderpaper.com/googles-gemini-ai-assistant-surpasses-one-billion-users/

12 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC81 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mstaryun

#테마섹 #삼성전자 #SK하이닉스 #한국 12일 관계부처 등에 따르면 싱가포르 테마섹은 최근 삼성전자 와 SK하이닉스 에 대한 투자를 결정하고 투자 집행 시점을 타진하기 위해 한국 정부와 접촉한 것으로 확인됐다. 투자 방식은 외부 자산운용사를 통한 위탁운용이 아닌 내부 인력을 통한 직접 투자 방식을 택한 것으로 전해졌다. 금융당국 한 관계자는 "삼성전자와 SK하이닉스 주가가 최근 정부의 단일종목 레버리지 상장지수펀드(ETF) 허용 이후 극심한 변동성을 보이는 국면에서 자금 집행 시점 등을 타진하기 위해 접촉한 것으로 알고 있다"고 전했다. 테마섹이 한국 증시에 투자하는 것은 이번이 처음이다. https://view.asiae.co.kr/article/2026081210232989087

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @anysong_Technon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 373,863 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

루팡
@bornlupin · 47,118
6 posts
AWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널
@darthacking · 64,869
4 posts
카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 21,869
2 posts
머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,312
2 posts
해외정보 분석
@pcstfu · 3,507
2 posts
유진투자증권 ETF/파생 강송철
@buykkang · 5,497
1 post
중국주식반점(饭店)
@chinastockrestaurant8 · 4,767
1 post
꿈을 담는 단지
@dykim0210 · 3,056
1 post
프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,544
1 post
한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영
@G2strategy · 15,467
1 post
오를주식(GoUp)📈 - 뉴스/정보/주식/경제
@GoUpstock · 20,879
1 post
오늘의 핵씸
@hackssim · 239
1 post
하나증권 미국주식 강재구
@hana_us_stock · 10,055
1 post
하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 34,893
1 post
알음다트
@infodart · 6,620
1 post
Insider Paper
@insiderpaper · 109,353
1 post
이지스 리서치 (주식 투자 정보 텔레그램)
@jeilstock · 26,464
1 post
KB 채권 - 임재균 & 박문현🙂
@jk_bond · 3,419
1 post
엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실
@Jstockclass · 25,917
1 post
KK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 18,552
1 post
[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 23,259
1 post
投資, 아레테
@mstaryun · 18,302
1 post
PE, M&A, 대체투자, 거버넌스, 책 뉴스
@pef_news · 963
1 post
[신한 리서치본부] 인터넷/게임
@seokokang · 6,333
1 post
트릴리온
@Trillion_labs · 9,254
1 post
트리플 아이 - Insight Information Indepth
@triple_stock · 12,667
1 post
월스트릿동물학
@wallstbearcup · 1,056
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@아무자료 아무노래(2026년, 계급사회 가속화 3.0)” (@anysong_Technon), 4,978 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anysong_Technon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.