Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FOMO 4가투

Channel

FOMO 4가투

@fourgachi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,361subscribers

+1,035 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002082919471
TypeChannel
Username@fourgachi
Description채널에 언급한 종목을 보유하고 있을 수도, 없을 수도 있습니다. 또한 보유하고 있다 하더라고 이를 이미 매도했거나 추후 매도할 수 있습니다. 본 채널은 투자 판단에 책임을 지지 않으며 매수/매도 추천이 아닙니다. 제가 공부한 내용에 대한 공유입니다. 해당 게시물의 내용은 어떤 경우에도 법적 근거로 사용될 수 없습니다.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/fourgachi

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 8 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bbong_tta/236306 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC@fourgachi/25280 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@bbong_tta/236356 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC@fourgachi/25293 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 08:25 UTC1.0023 minutes
@d_ticker/40734 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC@fourgachi/25124 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 07:59 UTC1.003 minutes
@d_ticker/40916 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC@fourgachi/25287 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTC1.0010 minutes
@d_ticker/41039 Nov 2026, 06:46 UTC@fourgachi/25366 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 06:48 UTC1.002 minutes
@Ten_level/9065521 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC@fourgachi/23008 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC1.0010 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bbong_tta8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutes@bbong_tta (5–3)
@hedgehara14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@hedgehara (9–5)
@d_ticker5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006 minutes@d_ticker (5–0)
@Ten_level6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minuteseven
@Yeouido_Lab9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 minutes@Yeouido_Lab (5–4)
@idea_memo5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008 minutesthis entry (3–2)
@pikachu_aje5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0087 minutesthis entry (5–0)
@Kyaooo6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 10 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 118 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,2979,4318,8646 August 2026 — 8,326 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,321 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,316 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,301 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,317 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,313 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,308 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,297 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,303 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,299 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,338 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,363 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,356 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,375 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,384 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,405 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,415 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,418 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,568 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,431 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,425 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,419 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,397 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,385 subscribers7 November 2026 — 9,374 subscribers10 November 2026 — 9,361 subscribers9,3616 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 97 days, net +1,035. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,127–9,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 18:119,361-13
7 Nov 2026, 09:189,374-11
4 Nov 2026, 00:569,385-12
1 Nov 2026, 10:309,397-22
27 Oct 2026, 00:409,419-6
23 Oct 2026, 17:469,425-6
20 Oct 2026, 13:019,431+863
17 Oct 2026, 22:588,568+150
15 Oct 2026, 00:508,418+3
11 Oct 2026, 14:168,415+10
5 Oct 2026, 04:418,405+21
26 Sept 2026, 22:368,384+9
17 Sept 2026, 10:158,375+19
13 Sept 2026, 09:418,356-7
9 Sept 2026, 20:008,363+25
4 Sept 2026, 05:578,338+39
31 Aug 2026, 10:448,299-4
28 Aug 2026, 20:188,303+6
26 Aug 2026, 02:548,297-11
23 Aug 2026, 02:188,308first reading

Engagement

519 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 9,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
217 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.348%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
217
of 519 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 90 of 217 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held519 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total293,436
Reactions total448
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 22:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,460
Videos
≈140
Links
≈5,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 29s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,229 reactions across 201 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤39532.1%
👍20016.3%
😁14111.5%
🤬987.97%
🔥655.29%
😱493.99%
👏433.50%
🤣322.60%
😭252.03%
🤪221.79%
🤔211.71%
😡171.38%
🤯161.30%
😢141.14%
🍌131.06%
🌭120.976%
🙏90.732%
🤷‍♂90.732%
🤷70.57%
🙊60.488%
12 further kinds352.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 237 of the 519 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 519 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 217 posts held from the last 30 days (1.84%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 22:22 UTC829 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @TreeCapitalBotPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

10 Nov 2026, 21:37 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 10 November 2026

어제부로 조달하기 더 어려워졋는데 자꾸 돈쓴다는 이야기 하시네. 죽으시길

10 Nov 2026, 21:37 UTC≈1,000 views0 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @globaletfiPhoto

» CoreWeave, 시장 예상치를 상회하는 3분기 실적 발표 직후 After-Market 거래에서 10% 이상 급등했으나 큰 폭의 되돌림 진행. 대규모 설비투자와 높은 차입비용 등 재무 부담에 대한 우려가 상승폭을 제한한 것으로 추정 » 3분기 매출액 1달러당 약 4달러의 CapEx를 집행하는 등 매출 규모를 크게 웃도는 인프라 투자 지속. 고객사 인프라 구축을 당초 계획보다 앞당기면서 단기 현금흐름과 추가 자금조달 부담 확대 가능성 » 6월 기준 부채 및 리스 의무가 500억 달러를 상회하고, 2030년 만기 회사채 수익률도 약 15.2%에 달하는 상황. 높은 금융비용과 대규모 투자에 따른 재무 부담이 지속되는 가운데, 여전히 수익성 개선과 현금흐름 확보 여부가 주요 변수

10 Nov 2026, 21:17 UTC≈1,150 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @G2strategy

코어위브 3분기 매출 서프라이즈 & 연간 가이던스 상향 조정. 시간외 약 6% 상승 • 매출 36.6억달러 vs. 예상 35.6억달러 • 순손실은 -7.09억달러 vs. 예상 -8.504억달러 • 수주잔고 약 1325억달러 • 연간 매출은 130억-133억달러 예상. 기존 예상은 120억-130억달러. 연간 RRR 가이던스 200억-210억달러로 상향 조정 • 코어위브 시간외 5.9%, 네비우스 3% 상승 CoreWeave收入超预期,上调全年营收指引,股价盘后涨约6% CoreWeave三季度营收36.6亿美元,分析师预期35.6亿美元。三季度净亏损7.09亿美元,分析师预期亏损8.504亿美元。至9月30日,销售订单积压大约1325亿美元。预计全年营收130亿-133亿美元,公司原本预计120亿-130亿美元。上调年度运行率营收(RRR)预期至200亿-210亿美…

👍1

10 Nov 2026, 20:47 UTC961 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @rafikiresearch

*FED’S BOWMAN SEES RISK OF LARGE CORRECTION TO EQUITY VALUATIONS 연준의 보우먼, 주식 가치 평가에 큰 폭의 조정 가능성 시사

10 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,520 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026

내년도 못믿어서 ㅈㄴ 파는데 뭔 2030년타렬

❤4

10 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @KimchiTerminal

골드만삭스, 앤트로픽($ANT)의 2030년 매출이 6,000억 달러를 넘어설 것이라고 전망함.

10 Nov 2026, 14:12 UTC844 views0 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @d_tickerPhoto

가스터빈 생산예약 축소…GE버노바 주가 폭락 - 소프트뱅크 그룹과 자체 비전펀드2가 공동 출자한 미국 데이터센터 전담 특수목적법인 SB7이 미국 오하이오주 데이터센터 프로젝트 'PORTS-Pike'에 전력설비 구매 계약에 지난 9월까지 1.5조엔을 지출했음 - SB7은 이번 3분기 실적을 통해 해당 프로젝트에 공급할 전력설비의 생산슬롯을 줄이도록 계약을 변경하며 이에 따른 선급금 손실 4570억엔을 계상했음. 이미 낸 1.5조엔 가운데 40%를 날린 셈 - 이 부지에는 약 9.2GW 규모의 가스터빈 발전소를 짓기로 했음. 터빈은 GE버노바에 주문했다고. 이번 취소로 GE버노바가 타격을 입음. 물론 생산슬롯 예약금이 있어(관행상 전체 계약액의 20%) 방어 장치는 있음 - GE버노바 경영진은 10월 28일 어닝콜에서 "고객의 생산슬롯 취…

10 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,330 views7 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @hedgehara

이제 유가 빠진다고 인플레 잡히는 구간은 끝난거 같기도 함. 쉘터 빠지고 그랬는데 상승 품목의 비중이 3개월 연속 더 많아지고, 절사평균도 0.34에 일회성인 중고차가 -1.2%로 -4.1bp 깠는데도 지금 이 지경이 난듯. 에너지가 다른걸로 전이되고 있음. 사람들은 자꾸 유가가 일회성이라고 이야기하는데 이게 전이되는걸 과소평가하는 경향이 있음..

🙊5👏2

10 Nov 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,290 views0 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @crazyeconPhoto

CPI MoM 0.4% Food 0.5% Energy 0.7% Core CPI 0.3% Goods 0.2% Services 0.3% Shelter 0.3%

Showing the 12 most recent of 519 posts we hold for @fourgachi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Republishes 84 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

김치터미널
@KimchiTerminal · 6,274
42 posts
Pluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,579
12 posts
미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 74,015
11 posts
AWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널
@darthacking · 65,571
9 posts
[신한 리서치본부] 유틸리티/신재생
@ShinhanUtilityNewEnergy · 5,066
8 posts
Rafiki research
@rafikiresearch · 20,654
8 posts
하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,273
6 posts
돼지바
@bbong_tta · 12,887
6 posts
한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영
@G2strategy · 16,724
5 posts
Granit34의 투자스토리
@Joorini34 · 12,567
5 posts
선수촌
@athletes_village · 22,138
4 posts
딘스티커 Dean's Ticker
@d_ticker · 16,242
4 posts
Polaristimes
@The_MariTimes · 7,586
3 posts
루팡
@bornlupin · 49,242
3 posts
중국주식반점(饭店)
@chinastockrestaurant8 · 4,832
3 posts
Fund Easy 잡담모드
@fundeasy_choi · 10,815
3 posts
습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,313
3 posts
investor92
@investor_92 · 1,048
3 posts
Market News Feed
@marketfeed · 39,726
3 posts
묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,801
3 posts
주린이 개소리하는 채널
@Dogrini · 4,724
2 posts
Walter Bloomberg
@WalterBloomberg · 33,796
2 posts
iM전략 김준영
@crazyecon · 7,501
2 posts
다영의 뉴스공장
@dynewscollecters · 3,162
2 posts
서화백의 그림놀이 🚀
@easobi · 23,386
2 posts
하나증권/에너지화학/윤재성
@energy_youn · 11,039
2 posts
heyda
@heyda4646 · 3,013
2 posts
호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,354
2 posts
IH Research
@ihresearch · 8,833
2 posts
키움증권 해외선물 톡톡
@kwtok · 9,440
2 posts
미미의 신고가
@mimi_ATH · 6,753
2 posts
요약하는 고잉
@one_going · 48,209
2 posts
돌다리🚦
@stbridgee · 4,645
2 posts
YIELD & SPREAD
@yieldnspread · 22,089
2 posts
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,325
1 post
BRILLER
@BRILLER_Research · 17,974
1 post
64비트사령부⚡️ 🇰🇷🇺🇸
@BTCpentagon · 6,582
1 post
Bad Onion 나쁜양파
@Badonions · 4,770
1 post
벤의 실시간 뉴스 (Ben 24 News)
@Ben24News · 214
1 post
급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치
@FastStockNewsUSA · 41,019
1 post
Fin Watch
@Fin_Watch · 31,367
1 post
TIME ACT!VE ETF
@activeetf · 9,939
1 post
대신증권 원자재 최진영
@akacommodity · 5,250
1 post
알테오젠 IR
@alteogenIR · 9,805
1 post
🚨별이네💎멍멍놀이터🔥
@byulEnae · 2,631
1 post
카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,076
1 post
차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,088
1 post
💎다이아광산특급열차
@diatrain · 6,115
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,510
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,076
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
💯똥밭에 굴러도 주식판
@daegurr · 23,776
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
김찰저의 관심과 생각 저장소
@kimcharger · 25,264
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
YM리서치
@ym_research · 39,840
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
AWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널
@darthacking · 65,571
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
회색인간의 매크로 + 투자
@mistergray_11 · 19,792
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
KK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 21,169
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 September 2026
기술적 분석으로 보는 주식시장 (by 소라게아빠)
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,453
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
스탁이지 - AI 투자 어시스턴트
@maddingStock · 20,884
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
AWAKE - 52주 신고가 모니터링
@awake_realtimeCheck · 22,874
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
서화백의 그림놀이 🚀
@easobi · 23,386
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
피카츄 아저씨⚡️
@pikachu_aje · 24,923
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,313
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,200
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
Yeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,456
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
선진짱 주식공부방
@sunstudy1111 · 55,188
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Rafiki research
@rafikiresearch · 20,654
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
Buff
@bufkr · 21,585
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
타점 읽어주는 여자(타자)
@tazastock · 40,945
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
시장 이야기 by 제이슨
@bumgore · 35,370
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
YIELD & SPREAD
@yieldnspread · 22,089
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
조기주식회 공부방
@EarlyStock1 · 24,379
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
TNBfolio
@TNBfolio · 25,170
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FOMO 4가투” (@fourgachi), 9,361 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fourgachi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.