33%의 FMS 응답자가 기업이 과잉투자하고 있다고 답해 기록적 수준
custom 60372407211555615367

Channel
@survival_DoPB
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,243subscribers
-320 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001612596289 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @survival_DoPB |
| Description | 치열한 주식시장에서 함께 생존하기 위한 공간입니다. #Disclaimer • 업로드 되는 모든 종목은 작성자 및 작성자와 연관된 사람들이 보유하고 있을 가능성이 있습니다. • 또한 해당 종목 및 상품을 보유 또는 매도했을 가능성이 있으며 보유하고 있는 경우, 추후 매도할 가능성이 있음을 알립니다. • 모든 게시글은 외부 압력없이 스스로 작성했으며, 투자에 대한 모든 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있음을 알립니다. t.me/Do_PB |
| Created | 1 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/survival_DoPB |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 22,243 | -32 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 22,275 | -6 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 22,281 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 22,287 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 22,292 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 22,295 | +5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 22,290 | -23 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 22,313 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 22,317 | +42 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:53 | 22,275 | -29 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:34 | 22,304 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 22,321 | -20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 22,341 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 22,353 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 22,363 | -20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 22,383 | -20 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 22,403 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 22,414 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 22,426 | -18 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 22,444 | first reading |
49 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (4 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 167,180 |
| Reactions total | 217 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
462 reactions across 46 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6037240721155561536 | 341 | 73.8% | |
| 🔥 | 48 | 10.4% | |
| ⚡ | 34 | 7.36% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 5.84% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 1.30% | |
| 🦄 | 6 | 1.30% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 479 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
33%의 FMS 응답자가 기업이 과잉투자하고 있다고 답해 기록적 수준
custom 60372407211555615367
미 10년물과 WTI의 3개월 rolling correlation이 65%로 35년 최고 수준까지 상승
custom 60372407211555615366
가장 Crowded한 Trade는 Global Semis
🔥4custom 60372407211555615361
이란, 미국의 봉쇄 완화 시 7일 내 호르무즈 해협 재개방 제안: 교도통신 이란은 워싱턴이 이란 항구에 대한 봉쇄를 종식하기 위한 초기 조치를 취하고 해협 주변의 군사 작전을 중단한다면 7일 내에 호르무즈 해협을 재개방하겠다고 제안했다고 교도통신이 이란 고위 관리를 인용해 보도했다. 이 제안은 중재자들을 통해 워싱턴에 전달된 것으로 전해지며, 테헤란은 유엔 총회 주변에서 추가 회담을 계획하고 있다. 아직 합의에 도달하지 않았다. 이란은 이전에 호르무즈 재개방을 미국의 봉쇄 종식과 연계한 바 있다.
custom 603724072115556153611⚡1
이란 고위 당국자, 미국이 실질적인 조치를 취한다면 테헤란은 외교 재개를 환영한다고 밝혀
custom 60372407211555615365🔥1
🤩MSCI ACWI(All Country World Index) 연한 파란색 막대: 해당 연도에 전년보다 P/E가 상승한 종목의 비율 진한 파란색 선: MSCI ACWI의 연간 수익률 빨간 점선: 약 36% 수준, 현재 2026년의 P/E 상승 종목 비중과 유사한 레벨임 2026년을 보면 MSCI ACWI는 대략 +10% 안팎의 플러스 수익률을 기록하고 있는데, 전년보다 P/E가 높아진 종목은 전체의 약 36% 정도에 불과함. 즉 주가는 올랐지만 대부분의 종목에서 밸류에이션 멀티플은 오히려 확장되지 않았다는 것이 핵심임. 고금리가 글로벌 주식시장의 P/E를 누르고 있다는 증거 2026년 글로벌 증시는 지수가 올랐음에도 대부분의 종목에서 P/E가 올라가지 않았으며, 이는 현재 시장 상승이 밸류에이션 버블보다는 이익 성장에 의해 지탱되고…
⚡8custom 60372407211555615366🙏1
Posted without readable text
🔥14custom 60372407211555615365🙏3
* The Information 앤스로픽이 최대 5,170억 달러에 달할 수 있는 컴퓨팅 자원 확보 계약을 마련했다. 이는 투자자들에게 제시했던 2029년까지의 예상 지출액 1,800억 달러를 크게 웃도는 규모다. 이러한 계약상 지출 약정은 앤스로픽이 기업공개(IPO) 가능성을 앞두고 향후 성장에 얼마나 공격적으로 대비하고 있는지를 보여준다. ** 그들이 말하는 '감속'(pacing)은 '투자의 속도조절'이 아니라 '모델 출시의 속도조절' https://x.com/theinformation/status/2098849145188418001
custom 60372407211555615368
알만데브 해협이 예멘 전투원들에게 장악되었다고 IRIB가 보도 "타스님 특파원에 따르면, 알 아르디 지역이 함락되고 예멘 무장 세력이 이 지역에 진입함에 따라 바브 알만데브가 통제 하에 있다"
custom 60372407211555615364
유가와 DSI 상단 = WTI 국제유가 가격 흐름 하단 = 원유 선물 트레이더들의 단기 심리 -> Daily Sentiment Index(DSI) 현재 원유 DSI가 91% Bulls까지 상승했음. 이는 조사 대상 트레이더 가운데 약 91%가 향후 유가 상승을 예상한다는 의미로, 시장 심리가 극단적인 낙관 구간에 진입했음을 보여줌
custom 603724072115556153615
이란과 걸프 국가들, 호르무즈 해협 통항 합의 위해 회담 개최 추진 회담 개요 및 목적 오만의 주도로 걸프협력회의(GCC) 6개 회원국 외교장관들과 이란 외교 당국자가 오만의 해안 도시 살랄라에서 회동을 추진 중. 미국과 이란의 전쟁이 발발한 지난 2월 이후 GCC 외교수장들과 이란 고위 관리가 만나는 것은 이번이 처음. 회담의 핵심 목적은 글로벌 에너지 수출의 대동맥인 호르무즈 해협의 선박 통항을 임시로 관리하는 방안에 대해 GCC 회원국의 지지를 확보하고 양측의 적대 행위를 완화하는 것. 임시 통항 합의의 내용과 한계 이란과 오만은 최근 선박이 이란 영해를 통해 해협으로 진입하고 주로 오만 영토 인근을 통해 빠져나가는 비과세 임시 통항로 마련을 최종 조율해 옴. 다만 호르무즈 해협이 완전히 재개방되려면 미국과 이란 간의 별도 합…
⚡4custom 60372407211555615361
사우디 왕세자 MBS, 트럼프 대통령에게 후티 공격 촉구 위해 목요일 두 차례 전화... 트럼프는 거절, 미국 관리들 "당분간 직접 개입 계획 없어"(Axios 보도)
custom 60372407211555615368🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @survival_DoPB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“도PB의 생존투자” (@survival_DoPB), 22,243 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/survival_DoPB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.