Channel
@Donmaek
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,542subscribers
+515 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001773458508 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Donmaek |
| Description | 시장한테 맞아본 형이 매일 복기함 종목 언급은 매수 추천 아님. 직접 확인 필수 후원 : https://litt.ly/donmaek 문의 : [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Donmaek |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 18:05 | 6,542 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:44 | 6,544 | -12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 6,556 | +35 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:46 | 6,521 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:31 | 6,526 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 6,532 | +23 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:50 | 6,509 | +84 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 6,425 | +74 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 6,351 | -12 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 6,363 | +2 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 6,361 | -12 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 6,373 | +60 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 6,313 | +11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 6,302 | +126 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 6,176 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 6,173 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 6,171 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 6,182 | +47 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 6,135 | +96 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 6,039 | first reading |
117 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 62 of 75 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 117 (3 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 133,824 |
| Reactions total | 609 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 11:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,109 reactions across 103 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🫡 | 295 | 26.6% | |
| 😁 | 228 | 20.6% | |
| 😭 | 164 | 14.8% | |
| 😱 | 159 | 14.3% | |
| 🤪 | 108 | 9.74% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 4.96% | |
| 😍 | 49 | 4.42% | |
| 💊 | 34 | 3.07% | |
| ✍ | 17 | 1.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 76 posts held from the last 30 days (6.58%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
돈맥경화 연구소 pinned «거대병아리 채널 넘겨받고 5천 명 때 한 설문에서 섹터·종목 보는 이유, 움직일 때와 기다릴 때, 멘탈 잡는 법을 더 풀어달라는 의견이 있었음 본 채널은 시황·돈 흐름·뻘소리 그대로 가고 베타 채널에서 근거·시나리오·대응·복기를 풀어볼 생각 궁금한 건 받으면서 채워봄 대상은 주린이랑 공부할 시간 없는 직장인 공부 시간 줄이고 깡통 차는 길로는 안 가게 방향 잡는 게 목적 자기 방법 있는 분, 콘텐츠 도둑질하는 놈은 안 받음 종목 상담, as 안받음»
거대병아리 채널 넘겨받고 5천 명 때 한 설문에서 섹터·종목 보는 이유, 움직일 때와 기다릴 때, 멘탈 잡는 법을 더 풀어달라는 의견이 있었음 본 채널은 시황·돈 흐름·뻘소리 그대로 가고 베타 채널에서 근거·시나리오·대응·복기를 풀어볼 생각 궁금한 건 받으면서 채워봄 대상은 주린이랑 공부할 시간 없는 직장인 공부 시간 줄이고 깡통 차는 길로는 안 가게 방향 잡는 게 목적 자기 방법 있는 분, 콘텐츠 도둑질하는 놈은 안 받음 종목 상담, as 안받음
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😍3
위에 얘기들은 이미 지난 거 반성하는 거고 여기서 추가로 숏 잡는거보단 상방 룸에 대한 승률이 높아보임 새로운 거, 변화 포인트가 생긴 부분에 집중하겠음
🫡14
폭락에 돈 넣는거는 차트보고 지지 왔다 뭐 이런거 다 필요없음 폭락에 심리까지 쏠리면 무지성 상승처럼 무지성 하락도 나옴 이 때는 차트고 수급이고 뭐고 다 필요없이 파괴하고, 확실한 반등 시그널이 나온 후에 움직임 일반적으로는 정책 개입등의 뭔가 큰 변화가 포인트였던 기록이 많다고 함
나도 당해봐서 안다
비비기가 이렇게 무서운 거임 반대매매 피하려는 개미들은 어디선가 대출이든 뭐든 돈 빌려서 채워넣어야 하고 반등 희망을 주면서 추가 입금한 돈 마저 다 털어가는 거 그렇다고 숏이냐? 롱이냐? 둘 다 죽일 수 있음
🤪9
예상 지수 -19% -12%를 본 거 같은데
😱5
어? 잠깐만...... 옷이......
😱13
클로드 시켜본 불륜 랠리 가능성 기업들
불륜 랠리 대기열 $INTC 2018년 기혼 CEO가 직원과 사내 불륜으로 사임, 6년 뒤 3분의 1 토막 올해 AI 랠리로 겨우 입장함 $BA 2005년 CEO 불륜으로 사임, 21년 동안 3.3배, 같은 기간 S&P는 6배 랠리 아직 반만 옴 $TKO(구 WWE) 2001년 맥마흔이 불륜을 직접 인정하고 1년 넘게 12~13달러에서 놀다가 25년 걸려서 191달러 랠리 나오긴 함 셀트리온 2023년 서정진 회장 불륜·혼외자 보도 뒤 3년 반 동안 +33%, 같은 기간 코스피는 2.5배 랠리 아직 안 옴 $NVDA 신규 입장
😁5
불륜 랠리는 또 뭐여
🫡2
자이로드롭 꼭대기에서 다신 안 탄다고 빌었음 📅 주간 시장 정리 · 이번 주는 뭐 할까나 AI는 안 죽었음 근데 이번 주엔 칩도 전기도 아닌 데서 막힘 동네 허락임 선거 전까진 올라가는 구간이었음 불확실성만 끝나면 오른다고 다들 폰 꺼내서 사진 찍는 중이었음 결과는 민주당이 상·하원을 다 가져감 여기까진 미장도 웃었음 다우는 하루에 3% 뛰고 기름값은 확 빠짐 근데 이번 투표엔 데이터센터가 같이 올라가 있었음 텍사스·오하이오처럼 데이터센터 몰린 동네에서 짓지 말자는 쪽이 줄줄이 이김 동네 전기요금 오르는 게 싫다는 거임 꼭대기에서 1초 멈춤 그다음은 다들 앎 미국 반도체지수가 하루에 12% 넘게 빠짐 코로나 이후 최대 낙폭임 국장은 이틀 연속 사이드카에 서킷브레이커까지 걸림 장중 5000이 9개월 만에 깨졌음 꼭대기에서 비…
🫡5
Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @Donmaek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
거대병아리 채널 넘겨받고 5천 명 때 한 설문에서 섹터·종목 보는 이유, 움직일 때와 기다릴 때, 멘탈 잡는 법을 더 풀어달라는 의견이 있었음 본 채널은 시황·돈 흐름·뻘소리 그대로 가고 베타 채널에서 근거·시나리오·대응·복기를 풀어볼 생각 궁금한 건 받으면서 채워봄 대상은 주린이랑 공부할 시간 없는 직장인 공부 시간 줄이고 깡통 차는 길로는 안 가게 방향 잡는 게 목적 자기 방법 있는 분, 콘텐츠 도둑질하는 놈은 안 받음 종목 상담, as 안받음
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 14 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“돈맥경화 연구소” (@Donmaek), 6,542 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Donmaek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.