Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TRENDSETTER GLOBAL

Channel

TRENDSETTER GLOBAL

@TRENDSETTERVERSION2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,997subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001977983312
TypeChannel
Username@TRENDSETTERVERSION2
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TRENDSETTERVERSION2

Growth

3,9974,0094,0037 August 2026 — 4,009 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,009 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,003 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,998 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,997 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,995–4,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:283,997-1
14 Aug 2026, 05:573,998-5
10 Aug 2026, 22:124,003-6
7 Aug 2026, 11:464,009no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:394,009first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.5%
avg views ÷ 3,997 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held19 (22 July 202630 July 2026)
Views total19,383
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC≈2,460 viewsread 8 August 2026

역대급 장이네여. 내일 코스피가 20퍼센트 오르던 말든 오늘 작성을 해야할거 같아서 작성해봅니다. 이미 내일 하루 크게 반등한다고 대부분의 거래일이 나온 7월이라서.. 원래 코스피 기준 한달 크게 하락하면 보통 마이너스 15퍼센트 대세 하락장 오면 1달기준 마이너스 19-20퍼센트 였고 이번에 워낙 많이올라서 그래 1달 기준 마이너스 25퍼센트 까지는 이해해줄께 했는데... 오늘자 종가 기준 코스피 -34퍼센트...ㅡ.ㅡ;;; 어떻게 시장이 이럴수 있는가 온갖 욕 다하면서 이게 시장인가 도박장이지 올라갈때는 에스컬레이터 탈 정도로 빠른 시장인데 내릴때는 엘리베이터 탈 정도로 더 빠른 시장인가 욕했네요 이번에 배운건 3가지인데.. 1. 전 레버리지 ETF는 거대한 촉매제였다고 생각합니다. 핵심은 미국 반도체 회사

30 Jul 2026, 05:10 UTC906 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/cqq_4qL0zVc?si=nxHQyX-BXpytyMUp 이거라도 보면서 마음의 위안을 얻으시길 기원합니다.

30 Jul 2026, 05:09 UTC847 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

이 글 보시는 모두 힘내시길 기원합니다. 어제 야식잡썰에 이대호 기자님이 진짜 나쁜생각 할거면 그냥 남탓을 해라 라는 영상을 봤는데 너무 슬퍼하시지 마시고 힘들어하시지 않았으면 좋겠습니다. 돈은 또 주식으로 크게 불리는 날이 올겁니다. 이럴수록 위로의 영상들을 보면서 다시한번 힘내시길 기원합니다.

29 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC965 viewsread 8 August 2026

이다솔지점장님 말씀이 일종의 삼전닉스 3배 단일레버리지라고

29 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

욕심에 눈이 멀었음... 이러니 난리나지..

28 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC940 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @awake_globalwatchPhoto

🇺🇸 The Coca-Cola Company(+6.9%) ❗️ 역사적 신고가 다시 돌파 Sector : Consumer Defensive Industry : Beverages - Non-Alcoholic 종목코드 : KO 시가총액 : 386.6B(572.0조 krw) 거래대금 : 1.0B(2.0조 krw) 시총순위 : 31 → 25위(6계단🔺) [기업개요] - 글로벌 음료 시장에서 탄산음료와 비알콜 음료를 주력으로 하는 업체 - 최근 무설탕 제품군 확장과 신흥 시장에서의 매출 증가세 - 주요 매출원은 탄산음료와 비알콜 음료로 구성된 포트폴리오

27 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC≈2,750 viewsread 8 August 2026

국장은 하반기때 이 채널에서 이야기 안하고 싶지만 오늘은 좀 이야기 드려야 할거 같아서 작성합니다 오늘 SK이터닉스 두산퓨어셀 하한가 현대로템 에스티팜 대급락인데 시장이 악재에 아주 민감한 시장이라 봅니다. 원래는 시가총액 2조 이상이라면 진짜 임상 3상 정도 실패 정도 악재가 아니라면 하한가는 거의 나오지 않습니다. 근데 오늘 시총 2조 이상급이나 되는 2종목이 1개는 어닝쇼크 1개는 종전가능성으로 하한가를 보내어버리네요 현대로템은 목표주가 하향 레포트 하나로 -16퍼센트 에스티팜은 실적 어닝쇼크도 아니고 어닝미스로 -14퍼센트 대단한 장입니다. 안좋은 의미로 말씀드린 종목 모두 하락 맞기전에 시총 2조가 넘었구요. 제가 이 말씀을 드린건 지금 시장은 악재에 어마어마하게 민감한 시장입니다. 그것도 22년 24년 하락장

26 Jul 2026, 02:12 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 8 August 2026

한국 기온이 40도 육박하는거 같은데 이정도 더위면 사무직은 몰라도 현장근무(건설 토목 조선업 등)나 군인 경찰 등 현장직들은 사우디나 중동처럼 새벽 1-3시 사이 출근해서 9-11시 퇴근 같은 근무 조정 해야하는거 아님? 현장직들 오후 제일 뜨거운 시간에 현장 근무하다가 사망하겠는데?

25 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 8 August 2026

예멘후티반군이 사우디아라비아의 자잔과 윈나브에 위치한 석유 정유 시설을 발사체로 공격했습니다. 목표에 정확히 명중되었으며, 사우디아라비아 내 공격 대상 지역에서 화재와 연기가 발생하고 있습니다... 출처 https://t.me/Almustashaar/97357 글은 여기 글을 한국어로 번역한거임

23 Jul 2026, 21:32 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

나스닥 리스크 미국 주식시장에 자금을 너무 조달하고 있음

23 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC938 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://www.youtube.com/live/OvsBgjKg0A8?si=n8pbciwMaP0GfEH3

23 Jul 2026, 21:19 UTC938 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

출처 : https://www.youtube.com/live/OvsBgjKg0A8?si=lTb-cO3Z6q0CYP7Q

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TRENDSETTERVERSION2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TRENDSETTER GLOBAL” (@TRENDSETTERVERSION2), 3,997 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TRENDSETTERVERSION2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.