Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -635. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,676–15,589 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 00:04
14,849
-28
9 Nov 2026, 07:20
14,877
-36
7 Nov 2026, 21:07
14,913
-16
6 Nov 2026, 18:37
14,929
-9
5 Nov 2026, 18:47
14,938
+98
4 Nov 2026, 17:41
14,840
-6
3 Nov 2026, 15:27
14,846
-8
2 Nov 2026, 15:30
14,854
-7
1 Nov 2026, 16:09
14,861
-14
31 Oct 2026, 19:40
14,875
-3
30 Oct 2026, 17:35
14,878
+92
29 Oct 2026, 15:11
14,786
-20
28 Oct 2026, 11:30
14,806
-7
27 Oct 2026, 14:12
14,813
-9
26 Oct 2026, 16:00
14,822
-2
25 Oct 2026, 13:44
14,824
-1
24 Oct 2026, 11:38
14,825
-9
23 Oct 2026, 08:16
14,834
-10
22 Oct 2026, 06:40
14,844
+63
20 Oct 2026, 20:56
14,781
first reading
Engagement
91 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 14,849 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,710
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.058%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 91 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
91 (31 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
111,252
Reactions total
49
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 19:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,220
Videos
≈655
Links
≈8,550
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
98 reactions across 63 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
84
85.7%
🔥
13
13.3%
🤬
1
1.02%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 41 posts held from the last 30 days (12.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
작년 초 HYPE와 현재 ZEC 차트
VIKTOR가 말하고 싶은 건, 둘 다 그해의 메인 러너였고 특히 알트장이 계속 빠지는 와중에도 한 달 정도 혼자 잘 버텼다는 점에서 유사함
→ 그러다 결국 뒤늦게 시장을 따라 빠질 수도 있다는 얘기인 듯
2025년 2월: HYPE가 홈런 펌프 직후, 출혈을 겪는 알트 시장에 대해 한 달 동안 상대적 강세를 보임
2026년 10월-11월: ZEC가 홈런 펌프 직후, 출혈을 겪는 알트 시장에 대해 한 달 동안 상대적 강세를 보임
평소에도 베어리시 뷰를 자주 공유하는 계정이라는 점을 감안할 필요가 있음. 물론 최근 장 분위기와 맞물려 꽤 많이 맞추는 모습
🟢 NXPC, 다가오는 12월 대규모 토큰 소각
-NXPC는 12월 9,570만 NXPC를 한 번에 대규모 소각 예정
-이는 현재 유통량의 30%에 해당하는 비율
-추가로 향후 최소 52주동안 생태계 및 게임 리워드풀 배출을 0으로 줄이고 풀어지는 부분은 즉각소각
-인플레이션을 줄이고 기존 NXPC 보유분 및 프로토콜 수익으로 리워드 지급 대체
https://x.com/Nexpace_HQ/status/2119657965305340346
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @killberosDAO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @killberosDAO as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
COINNESS News Feed (코인니스) @coinnesskr · 30,389 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
폐지줍기 연구소 @airdr0p_lab · 20,455 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
에어드랍코리아 (Airdropkorea) @airdrop_kor · 21,269 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH @BChoSN · 26,326 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
불개미 CRYPTO @fireant_crypto · 32,703 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
🔥요블이 세상살이🔥 @yobeullyANN · 22,207 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
에어드랍ATM @Bounty_ATM · 25,805 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋 @WeCryptoTogether · 48,170 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방 @tlsrltnf · 22,355 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN @emperorcoin · 35,511 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
잼민123🦅 @mujammin123 · 25,756 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
30대에 은퇴번복한 머피 @murphybus · 19,905 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
DeFi 농부 👨🏻🌾 조선생 @BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,255 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
졸업준비위원회🎓 @officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,657 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
기분좋은 마곤 @magonia_b · 26,189 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
새우잡이어선 공지방 @shrimp_notice · 28,311 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
취미생활방📮 @enjoymyhobby · 48,840 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
마샬 공유방 2.0 @marshallog · 21,370 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
코인 갤러리(Coin gallery) @dogeland01 · 20,904 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
해달의 투자 정보 공유 @seaotterbtc · 30,000 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
ZAP Tech News @zaponblast · 62,962 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Layergg exchange & project alert @layergg · 19,298 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
New Listings Feed @NewListingsFeed · 59,178 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Gram 🇰🇷 @toncoin_kr · 22,951 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“킬베로스 ( Killberos ) 🐾” (@killberosDAO), 14,849 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/killberosDAO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.