Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

머니보틀

@moneybottle

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,309subscribers

+43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001319564729
TypeChannel
Username@moneybottle
Description저는 구독자분들에게 DM으로 먼저 연락드려서 카톡방 초대, 투자 권유를 절대 하지 않습니다. 사칭 주의 *본 채널은 투자 권유 및 투자 자문이 아닌 단순 정보 공유 채널입니다. 가상자산의 경우 큰 변동성으로 원금 일부 혹은 전부의 손실 가능성이 있습니다. 모든 글은 투자 추천이 아니며 투자 근거로 사용될 수 없습니다
Created8 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/moneybottle

Growth

15,26615,32715,296.56 August 2026 — 15,266 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,266 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,299 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,298 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,327 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,325 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,322 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,309 subscribers15,3096 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,257–15,336 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:0215,309-13
11 Aug 2026, 05:4315,322-3
10 Aug 2026, 04:1815,325-2
9 Aug 2026, 00:5115,327+29
7 Aug 2026, 22:5115,298-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:3515,299+33
6 Aug 2026, 02:2115,266no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:0315,266first reading

Engagement

109 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.2%
avg views ÷ 15,309 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,640
107 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.494%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
109
of 109 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 101 of 107 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held109 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total282,221
Reactions total1,342
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
199
Videos
2
Links
106

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,088 reactions across 83 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
58153.4%
👍19317.7%
👏605.51%
🍾514.69%
🤨504.60%
👀393.58%
😁333.03%
🆒211.93%
😴141.29%
🫡121.10%
🐳70.643%
💋50.46%
🙏50.46%
🔥40.368%
🎅30.276%
😇30.276%
🤩30.276%
😍20.184%
😐20.184%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,342reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 107 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moneybottle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 109 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC≈1,070 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

지금 코인 망했다는 얘기하는 사람들이 작년에 국장 망했다고 하던 사람들이네요 기다리면 턴은 옵니다 차트만 보면 전닉보다 비트 이더가 훨씬 좋아보여요

👍115

12 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,080 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

[부엉이의 눈] 솔리다임 나스닥행의 이면 source 재주는 SK하이닉스가 넘고, 돈은 SK가 번다 SK㈜의 최대주주는 SK㈜(약 17.9%)를 통해 SK스퀘어(32.16%)와 SK하이닉스(20.0%)까지 지배하되 실질 지분율은 1%대에 그치는데도, 재편된 이익 흐름의 최종 수취자 자리에 앉는다.

7

12 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC≈1,430 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

전국민이 노조때문에 반년째 스트레스 받고있음 대통령의 빠른 개입 요망

👍152

12 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @nq_rgc

외인이 배당더타가는게 싫음 외인보다 더사면 됩니다. 아니 그건 둘째치고 미국 고배당etf는 잘만사면서 왜 외인이 타가는건 안된단건가요?

12 Aug 2026, 02:38 UTC≈1,290 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ChosunCrypto1Photo

나 조선코인은 항상 옳습니다

4

12 Aug 2026, 02:07 UTC≈1,760 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

반디클 한강 덮개공원 생기네요 https://naver.me/GxrcDuFm

3

12 Aug 2026, 00:55 UTC≈1,930 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

오디세우스 체험하는법 (유료)

5

12 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC≈1,980 views9 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

모든 정답지를 알려주는 조선코인

9

11 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC≈2,070 views12 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

새 역사를 쓰는 날이네요 메모리혁명수비대여러분 오늘도 좋은 하루 되세요

12

11 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC≈2,050 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

CITADEL: WE BELIEVE SYSTEMATIC BUYERS ARE GETTING READY TO LOAD UP ON STOCKS AGAIN AFTER A MASSIVE UNWIND

5

11 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC≈2,490 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

주주를 개 ㅈ으로 보는 삼전 하닉 직원들 성과급 전면 무효화 추진해야 할듯

👍283

11 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈2,180 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

아무튼 좋게 얘기됐다고함 출처는 미국 대통령

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @moneybottle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 9,926 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

인상주의 투자 인생 업그레이드노트
@insangnism · 11,235
5 posts
힙한 펭미업의 1인칭 시점
@pengmeup · 9,143
5 posts
뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,768
4 posts
캇즈의 크립토 노트📝☕️
@Katzenote · 6,782
3 posts
MtGox_Tracker
@mtgox_tracker · 51
3 posts
용산의 현인
@petrojimmy · 6,978
3 posts
@아무자료 아무노래(2026년, 계급사회 가속화 3.0)
@anysong_Technon · 4,988
2 posts
주식 급등일보🚀급등테마·대장주 탐색기 | Korean Stocks
@FastStockNews · 128,301
2 posts
조은 블록체인 오락실
@GoodMetaverseNFT · 192
2 posts
하루한장의 지식노트
@haruhanj · 640
2 posts
호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,156
2 posts
이교수 Memo
@ProfLeeMemo · 3,750
2 posts
MZ실버만 운동모드 ON
@silver_mansachs · 8,101
2 posts
SOJANG COIN NEWS
@SOJANG_signal · 357
2 posts
APE Research
@aper_channel · 272
1 post
ST Asian Parser
@asian_parser · 1,625
1 post
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH 🦅
@BChoSN · 24,859
1 post
망고복숭아
@btcmangopeach · 78
1 post
조선코인
@ChosunCrypto1 · 3,767
1 post
코인포
@coinpo2 · 7,066
1 post
반붐온? 방붐온?
@cpshelter · 5,326
1 post
트레이딩 관점 공유하는 방
@crypto_nasdaq_trading · 79
1 post
크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 9,258
1 post
데일리코인 - 트레이딩 집중 채널
@dailycoin77 · 35
1 post
스톡홀리데이
@dhk1567 · 35
1 post
The_heart_of_the_beast
@doubledigit100 · 3,595
1 post
그 비스크돌은 주식을 한다
@dress_up_darrling · 50
1 post
다영의 뉴스공장
@dynewscollecters · 2,645
1 post
Foint_Crypto 공지방
@Foint_crypto · 521
1 post
가투방(DCTG) 저장소
@gatubang · 14,608
1 post
GMB LABS
@GMBLABS · 11,446
1 post
공피고아의 주식 채널
@gongpigoa · 35
1 post
메모장
@idea_memo · 8,690
1 post
중도의 투자이야기
@joongdo · 4,128
1 post
[유진]전력기기/미드스몰캡 허준서
@jsheo · 5,383
1 post
점프
@jump0000 · 3,058
1 post
생각하는 사람
@LePenseurs · 778
1 post
리암의 코인공방
@liambitcoin · 4,614
1 post
제로스의 투자일기
@llxellosll · 867
1 post
Back To The Future 디터
@monsjae · 156
1 post
무서운망고 일기장
@needmoneyprint · 12
1 post
HolyMoly 🌏
@NFTHUNTERS1 · 119
1 post
너쟁이의 성실한 추추생활
@nje2e · 8,287
1 post
나스닥혁명수비대
@nq_rgc · 5,856
1 post
스타돔나이트쌍코피
@nurungE · 154
1 post
추격자 (feat. 온체인)
@OnchaindataChaser · 164
1 post
Premium Crypto Signals
@PCS2020 · 79
1 post
BUYagra
@psychotherapy101 · 5,968
1 post
Ricky의 뒷마당
@Rickybackyard · 26
1 post
벌꿀오소리
@sereneholyghost · 22
1 post
주식과 부동산
@slowstockT · 3,775
1 post
qqq
@Triangleweb3 · 864
1 post
야자반 - Y.Z. stock
@yaza_stock · 13,140
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“머니보틀” (@moneybottle), 15,309 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moneybottle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.