Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⚡️번개맞은뉴스 - 상위2% 주식텔레그램 채널

@stock_messenger

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25,712subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001431277802
TypeChannel
Username@stock_messenger
Description시장의 돈이 집중되는 주도주를 추적하며 관련 섹터의 뉴스를 공유하고 있습니다. ✅공유 내용은 수익을 보장하지 않으며, 제공되는 정보의 정확성과 완전성을 보장하지 않습니다. 투자로 인한 손실에 대해 책임을 지지 않습니다. 💻업종지도: https://bit.ly/3opLWSQ 📆번개캘린더(관심일정): https://bit.ly/3ooPJ2T
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stock_messenger

Growth

25,69825,73325,715.56 August 2026 — 25,728 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,720 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,723 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,733 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,724 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,722 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,708 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,698 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,712 subscribers25,7126 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,693–25,738 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:2425,712+14
13 Aug 2026, 14:1925,698-10
12 Aug 2026, 14:4525,708-14
11 Aug 2026, 16:2125,722-2
10 Aug 2026, 15:5225,724-9
9 Aug 2026, 15:1725,733+10
8 Aug 2026, 15:1425,723+3
7 Aug 2026, 16:5125,720-8
6 Aug 2026, 18:3325,728first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 25,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,950
93 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.217%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
93
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 89 of 93 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held93 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total367,053
Reactions total763
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,460
Videos
6
Links
27,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

763 reactions across 89 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
38951.0%
🔥9512.5%
🤣7910.4%
👏577.47%
👍547.08%
😱374.85%
😭243.15%
😁131.70%
70.917%
😈70.917%
👀10.131%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 763reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC≈2,260 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/009/0005721399

3👍1

14 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC≈3,350 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

샌디스크 “메모리 호황, 단기 사이클 아니다”…장기계약 확대

2🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC≈3,360 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

비에이치아이, 2분기 영업이익 455억…전년比 123.1%↑

🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC≈3,420 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

엔비디아 AI에 LG '몸통'…전자·엔솔·CNS '수주 패키지' 만든다 LG가 엔비디아와 전략적 MOU를 체결하고 엔비디아 AI 플랫폼을 바탕으로 계열사 기술을 결합한 산업용 AI 솔루션을 추진한다. LG는 2028년 충남 천안 80MW 규모 AI 팩토리를 목표로 냉각·배터리·센서·IT 인프라를 통합해 패키지로 글로벌 고객에 제안할 계획이다. 휴머노이드와 자율주행 등 사업에서 엔비디아 두뇌와 LG의 부품·시스템을 결합해 계열사 동반 수주 구조를 창출하려 한다.

5

14 Aug 2026, 02:37 UTC≈3,550 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/016/0002683999

5🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC≈3,520 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

하나證, “LG, 젠슨 황-구광모 美 회동 임박⋯로봇·AI 협력 기대감에 목표가 14만원↑”

2

13 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTC≈3,550 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026

SK하이닉스, 새 보따리 푼다…주주환원 추가 방안 이달 발표 SK하이닉스가 이달 중 대규모 주주환원 방안을 추가로 발표할 예정이다. 올해 2분기 매출 79조 3187억 원, 영업이익 60조 5426억 원을 기록하며 잉여현금흐름이 급증했다. 증권가는 환원 규모를 40조 원에서 최대 100조 원으로 전망한다.

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @stock_messenger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,076,698 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚡️번개맞은뉴스 - 상위2% 주식텔레그램 채널” (@stock_messenger), 25,712 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stock_messenger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.