Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 퀀텀 알고리즘

Channel

퀀텀 알고리즘

@quantum_ALGO

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,605subscribers

+126 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185561205
TypeChannel
Username@quantum_ALGO
Description퀀텀 알고리즘 채널은 퀀텀 알고리즘으로 주도업종 파악, 실적 우량주 매수 타이밍 포착, 스윙트레이딩 신호에 활용하는 것을 목표로하는 공간입니다. 구독자 여러분들의 투자에 도움이되도록 정선된 양질의 콘텐츠를 제공하도록 하겠습니다.
Created8 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/quantum_ALGO

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@meritz_research/4444217 Aug 2026, 22:53 UTC@quantum_ALGO/100919 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 00:27 UTC1.001.6 hours
@meritz_research/450193 Nov 2026, 22:57 UTC@quantum_ALGO/103931 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 22:57 UTC1.00under a minute
@meritz_research/450889 Nov 2026, 22:45 UTC@quantum_ALGO/104164 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 22:55 UTC1.009 minutes
@meritz_research/450919 Nov 2026, 23:05 UTC@quantum_ALGO/104167 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 23:11 UTC1.007 minutes
@meritz_research/450929 Nov 2026, 23:10 UTC@quantum_ALGO/104168 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 23:12 UTC1.002 minutes
@meritz_research/4510510 Nov 2026, 22:58 UTC@quantum_ALGO/104221 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 23:52 UTC1.0055 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@meritz_research6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.009 minutes@meritz_research (6–0)
@shinhanresearch6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0020 minutes@shinhanresearch (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 78 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,4787,6117,544.56 August 2026 — 7,479 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,479 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,481 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,478 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,482 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,485 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,483 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,479 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,482 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,508 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,538 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,552 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,549 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,552 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,603 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,608 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,603 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,606 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,601 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,599 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,608 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,610 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,611 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,605 subscribers7,6056 August 20269 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 95 days, net +126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,458–7,631 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 14:597,605-6
6 Nov 2026, 02:487,611+1
2 Nov 2026, 22:287,610+2
31 Oct 2026, 04:417,608+9
28 Oct 2026, 05:307,599-2
24 Oct 2026, 19:257,601-5
21 Oct 2026, 15:177,606+3
18 Oct 2026, 10:377,603-5
15 Oct 2026, 03:117,608+5
12 Oct 2026, 01:407,603+51
5 Oct 2026, 06:217,552+3
27 Sept 2026, 01:377,549-3
17 Sept 2026, 10:587,552+14
13 Sept 2026, 06:587,538+30
9 Sept 2026, 04:387,508+26
3 Sept 2026, 12:417,482+3
31 Aug 2026, 04:557,479-4
25 Aug 2026, 08:277,483-2
22 Aug 2026, 15:537,485+3
19 Aug 2026, 05:267,482first reading

Engagement

527 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.32%
avg views ÷ 7,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
404
287 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
287
of 527 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 287 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held527 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total116,085
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈21,100
Videos
≈8
Links
≈77,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 53 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5372.6%
👍1216.4%
👏22.74%
🔥22.74%
😱22.74%
💯11.37%
🥰11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 527 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 527 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 287 posts held from the last 30 days (4.18%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 01:45 UTC150 viewsread 11 November 2026

“클로드 믿고 사도 될까?”…1881조원 앤스로픽 IPO의 3가지 변수 https://naver.me/5DZGC3lv

11 Nov 2026, 01:18 UTC266 viewsread 11 November 2026

美데이터센터서 10조 손실…손정의 'AI 올인' 시험대 [도쿄나우] https://naver.me/GIIeZ3iq

11 Nov 2026, 00:34 UTC346 viewsread 11 November 2026

미 10년물 국채금리 장중 5% 돌파, 12월 빅스텝 가능성 14% https://naver.me/FSvYJ0zy

10 Nov 2026, 23:52 UTC275 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @merITz_tech

[메리츠증권 김선우, 김동관] [2027 Outlook 15] 반도체/IT소재장비/디스플레이 [Prolonged Upcycle] 안녕하세요, 메리츠 김선우/김동관입니다. 연간 전망 인뎁스 자료입니다. 최근 3년 메리츠 반도체 연간전망 제목은 아래와 같습니다. 25년전망: Disciplined Upcycle [=최대 생산자의 투자 축소] 26년전망: Accererating Upcycle [=경쟁적 구매로 인한 판가 급등] 이제 27년: Prolonged Upcycle [=여전한 공급 제약 속 지속적 개선] 7여년의 AI 압축 수요가 경쟁적으로 발생하며, 메모리 판가의 급등을 야기했습니다. 하지만 과거의 고점형성/사이클 반락 요인은 찾아보기 힘든 상황입니다. 오히려 AGI를 향한 경쟁적 투자에서 야기될 생각보다 강하고 끄떡없는 업사이클…

10 Nov 2026, 23:39 UTC211 viewsread 11 November 2026

[NH/윤진호] 로보틱스▣ NH/로 [Web발신] [NH/윤진호] 로보틱스 ▣ NH/로보틱스 - THE HUMANOIDS, 메이드인코리아 ▶ https://m.nhsec.com/c/qa2ua 안녕하세요. NH투자증권 로보틱스 담당 윤진호 연구원입니다. 글로벌 휴머노이드 양산 확대와 CES2027을 앞둔 시점에서 Initiation 보고서를 통해 ’K-휴머노이드를 모아가야하는 이유‘에 대해 작성하였습니다. 여전히 휴머노이드가 먼 미래의 혁신으로 여겨지고 있습니다. 하지만 ’27년 미중 패권전쟁에 따라 한국이 전략적 요충지로 부상하고, 로봇 지능의 고도화가 나타나며 의심이 기대감으로 바뀔 것이라 확신합니다. 로보틱스의 가장 큰 변곡점이 될 2027년, 투자 판단에 도움이 될 수 있는 보고서로 찾아뵙겠습니다. ▣ Top Picks ▶ 로…

10 Nov 2026, 23:39 UTC205 viewsread 11 November 2026

[NH/안재민] NHN■ NHN - 공급자 [Web발신] [NH/안재민] NHN ■ NHN - 공급자 우위의 데이터센터 시장 ▶ 2028년까지 큰 폭의 실적 성장 기대 - NHN에 대한 투자의견 Buy를 유지하고, 목표주가를 기존 85,000원에서 110,000원으로 상향. 2027년말 100MW 규모의 AI 데이터센터를 완공해 GPU 기반 인프라를 확장할 예정. 동사의 새로운 성장 동력인 네오클라우드 사업이 본격적인 궤도에 오를 전망 - AI 인프라 사업으로 2027년 큰 폭의 실적 성장을 기대. 2027년 실적은 매출액 3.4조원(+13.1% y-y), 영업이익 2,813억원(+35.2% y-y)로 추정. 100MW가 본격 가동될 2028년까지 실적 고성장 예상. 2028년 매출액 4.1조원(+19.9% y-y), 영업이익 3,50…

10 Nov 2026, 23:32 UTC140 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @bioksm

[미래에셋 김승민] 셀트리온(068270) Golden Decade, 셀트리온의 시간 ▶️투자의견 매수, 목표주가 35만원(기존 28만원)으로 상향 목표주가는 27F EBITDA 2조 8,207억원에 타깃 EV/EBITDA 29배를 적용했다. 신규 제품 성장 및 믹스 개선 통한 구조적 수익성 개선을 반영해 27F 매출액과 영업이익 추정치를 각각 +16%, +22% 상향 조정했다. 타깃 멀티플은 산도즈 바이오시밀러 사업의 내재 멀티플 25배 대비 +15% 프리미엄을 적용한 값이다. 현재 주가는 2027F EV/EBITDA 18배 수준에 거래되고 있으며 산도즈 대비 저평가되어 있다. ▶️바이오시밀러 골든 디케이드, 셀트리온의 시간 산도즈 주가는 신고가를 기록하며 바이오시밀러 비즈니스 재평가를 보여주고 있다. 산도즈는 26~40년 바이오시밀러 …

10 Nov 2026, 23:29 UTC175 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @KyoboRSC

[교보증권 제약/바이오/의료기기 정희령] ■ 한올바이오파마(009420): FcRn으로 류마티스를 누르다 - 당사는 IMVT-1402의 D2T RA Period2에서 600mg 투여군 내 주평가지표를 충족했으며, 2027년 임상 모멘텀이 다수 존재함에도 이뮤노반트 시가총액 대비 24.9% 수준으로 매력적 매수 구간으로 판단합니다. ■ IMVT-1402의 D2T RA Period2 데이터 발표 - 600mg 투여군 기준 ACR 반응률 92.5% 기록하며 위약군 75.6% 대비 개선 ■ 매력적 매수 구간이다 - 주가는 최근 임상중단 및 개발 중단으로 D2T RA 임상 Period1 결과 발표 전으로 회귀했으며, 이번 데이터 발표에도 이뮤노반트 시가총액 대비 24.9% 수준 보고서 링크: https://www.iprovest.com/uplo…

10 Nov 2026, 23:29 UTC153 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @hanyangresearch

한양증권 스몰캡 Analyst 이준석 [디케이티] 디케이티의 새로운 성장 패러다임 투자의견: N.R 목표주가 : - 현재주가(11/10): 23,400원 Upside : - 성장의 윤곽은 뚜렷해지고 동사의 2026년 예상 실적은 매출액 5,453억 원(+28.1% YoY), 영업이익 361억 원(+67.3% YoY)을 기록할 것으로 전망한다. 기존 모바일 사업의 계절적 변동성에도 불구하고 ESS BMS와 전장사업의 공급 확대가 실적 성장을 이끌고 있다. 특히 ESS BMS는 국내 배터리 3사의 공급망 진입을 기반으로 고객사 다변화가 본격화되고 있으며, 차량용 OLED와 무선충전기(WPC) 역시 신규 완성차 업체향 공급 개시와 기존 고객사의 물량 증가가 맞물리고 있다. 이에 따라 2027년 ESS BMS, 차량용 OLED, WPC의 예…

10 Nov 2026, 23:23 UTC255 viewsread 11 November 2026

"젠슨황 연인 앨리스황, 10조원 엔비디아 AI칩 중국으로 밀반입" https://naver.me/xeFCo2Nl

10 Nov 2026, 22:50 UTC312 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✅ 호텔업종 강세 지속 (2026년11월11일) 1) 오늘 Dow Jones US Hotels Index가 +2.21% 상승하며 역사적 고점 경신 2) Hyatt Hotels(+3.15%), Marriott International(+2.66%), Hilton Worldwide Holdings(+1.75%) 주요 호텔주 동반 상승 3) 중동 리스크 완화와 유가하락으로 호텔 수요 개선 기대감 반영 4) 최근 호텔주 강세는 AI에이전트가 OTA(Online Travel Agency: 익스피디아, Booking, 아고다, 트립)를 거치지 않고 호텔로 직접 예약을 하면서 OTA 수수료 절감에 따른 수익성 개선 가능성이 주가에 반영 5) 호텔업종 밸류에이션은 부담스러운 수준이나 "AI에이전트" 예약 활성화에 따른 수익성 개선이 확실한 호텔주…

10 Nov 2026, 22:32 UTC308 viewsread 11 November 2026

‘빅스텝’ 경계에 나스닥 0.74%↓…엔비디아 이틀간 9.6% 급락[월스트리트in] https://naver.me/xaTMk5SH

Showing the 12 most recent of 527 posts we hold for @quantum_ALGO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,076
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
KK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 21,169
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 September 2026
서화백의 그림놀이 🚀
@easobi · 23,386
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,313
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
김찰저의 관심과 생각 저장소
@kimcharger · 25,264
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,273
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
회색인간의 매크로 + 투자
@mistergray_11 · 19,792
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,510
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
⚡️번개맞은뉴스 - 상위2% 주식텔레그램 채널
@stock_messenger · 25,226
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
선진짱 주식공부방
@sunstudy1111 · 55,188
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
[하나증권 ETF] 박승진
@globaletfi · 20,575
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
그로쓰리서치(Growth Research) [독립리서치]
@growthresearch · 40,090
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
YIELD & SPREAD
@yieldnspread · 22,089
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
오를주식 - 뉴스/경제/주식
@GoUpstock · 21,089
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
타점 읽어주는 여자(타자)
@tazastock · 40,945
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
💯똥밭에 굴러도 주식판
@daegurr · 23,776
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
시황맨의 주식이야기
@shmstory · 39,582
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치
@FastStockNewsUSA · 41,019
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
기술적 분석으로 보는 주식시장 (by 소라게아빠)
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,453
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
루팡
@bornlupin · 49,242
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
실시간 주식 뉴스
@realtime_stock_news · 36,964
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Rafiki research
@rafikiresearch · 20,654
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
키움증권 미국주식 톡톡
@kwusa · 36,213
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
주식 급등일보🚀급등테마·대장주 탐색기 | Korean Stocks
@FastStockNews · 128,822
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“퀀텀 알고리즘” (@quantum_ALGO), 7,605 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quantum_ALGO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.