Channel
@cpshelter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,326subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001554941619 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cpshelter |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cpshelter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 5,326 | +13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 5,313 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 5,311 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 5,308 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 5,308 | first reading |
69 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 40,425 |
| Reactions total | 77 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
61 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 49.2% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 21.3% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 14.8% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 9.84% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
>>서버 DDR5 메모리 가격 이달 15~23% 전면 상승 •3분기 메모리 제조사들의 가격 인상이 이어지면서 이달 서버용 DDR5 가격이 15-23% 상승 •32GB·64GB·96GB DDR5 RDIMM 가격은 각각 900달러·1,590달러·2,650달러까지 올랐음. 현물시장에서는 각각 1,8002,100달러·3,0003,200달러·3,800~4,100달러 수준으로 거래되고 있음 •제조사의 DDR5 공급은 여전히 수요를 충족하지 못하는 상황이지만, 계약가격이 분기마다 상승하면서 대형 서버 고객들의 메모리 비용 부담에 대한 민감도도 높아지고 있음. •장기공급계약(LTA)이 잇따라 체결되면서 대형 고객의 DDR5 공급이 일정 부분 확보된 만큼, 향후 DDR5 가격 상승폭은 점차 완만해질 전망 >《科创板日报》12日讯，随着三季度原厂价格进一步…
https://view.asiae.co.kr/article/2026081210232989087
❤1
HBM ASP $4.2~4.5/Gb
Cantor) FMS(Future of Memory and Storage) 2026 후기: ASP 정점 논쟁 vs 수요 지속성, 주가는 이미 저점권 ■ 총평 FMS(Future of Memory and Storage) 2026 컨퍼런스는 올해도 성황이었으며, AI 주도 메모리 슈퍼사이클이 진행되는 가운데 NAND, DRAM, HBM, HBF 전반의 개발 동향에 대한 관심이 뜨거웠습니다. 새로운 아키텍처와 애플리케이션, 워크로드가 메모리 업체들의 공급 능력을 크게 웃도는 수요를 창출하고 있다는 점이 분명해졌으며, 일부 대화에서는 비트 수요가 공급을 5~10%포인트 상회하고 있고 이 격차가 이번 10년 내내 지속될 것이라는 언급이 나왔습니다. 최근 메모리 주식이 조정을 받으며 바이사이드 컨센서스가 향후 2개 분기 내 메모리 가격 정점을 예상하…
❤3
답은 부동산 https://youtu.be/v_lKfKtV554
❤1
코스피 변동성 하락 → 대만 메모리와 벌어진 격차를 좁혀갈것으로 예상 (JPM)
참 쉽지 않은 상황이죠 https://youtu.be/xz3opSB5tDs
곧 모즈타파 공식 사망 소식 나올듯한...?
🔥1
이란 최고지도자, 신임 사령관 임명 발표 * 알리 압둘라히 준장: 국군 참모총장 역임 * 키요마르 헤이다리 준장: 국군 참모차장 역임 * 아흐마드 바히디 장군으로 진급, 이란혁명수비대(IRGC) 사령관 겸직 * 무스타파 이자디 준장: 이란혁명수비대(IRGC) 부사령관 겸직 * 알리 아즈마에이 기함장: 이란혁명수비대(IRGC) 해군 사령관 역임 * 후세인 타엡 아야톨라: 바시지 저항군 사령관 역임
간첩 적발 https://youtu.be/k-HDKLCAvpw
솔리다임은 올해 상반기부터 다롄 2공장 투자를 재개하며 건설공사에 재돌입했다. 이르면 11월부터 생산 장비 반입을 시작해 내년 상반기에는 양산 체계를 갖추고 낸드플래시를 만들 계획이다. 신규 라인의 웨이퍼 투입 능력은 월 5만 장 수준으로 알려졌다. 기존 다롄 1공장의 월 10만 장과 합치면 현지 생산능력이 약 50% 늘어나는 셈이다. https://www.sedaily.com/article/20078238?ref=naver
❤1
삼성전자, 1나노부터 고개구율 EUV 기술 적용 https://naver.me/FdqSCacW
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @cpshelter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 139,864 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“반붐온? 방붐온?” (@cpshelter), 5,326 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cpshelter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.