Channel
@airdr0p_lab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,357subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001580306333 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @airdr0p_lab |
| Description | 크립토 폐지 수집 중! 로우코스트 로우리턴 지향 트위터 x.com/oldman_cek 링크트리 linktr.ee/updao_kr 개인 메시지 @CeK_94 * 채널 방향성을 고려하여 거래소 증정금 관련 광고는 진행하지 않고 있습니다. * 광고 및 kol 활동에 의해 작성 된 포스팅은 하단에 #ad, #kol 태그를 기재합니다. * 일부 포워딩 게시글의 경우 kol 활동을 포함하고있습니다. |
| Created | 13 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/airdr0p_lab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 20,357 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 20,364 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 20,366 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 20,370 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 20,378 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 20,371 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 20,379 | +14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:10 | 20,365 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 20,375 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 20,378 | first reading |
130 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 80 of 130 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 130 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 152,209 |
| Reactions total | 159 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
132 reactions across 61 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 132 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 130 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟢 Claude에 추가되는 워터마크 -Anthropic은 8월 2일 이후 출시되는 신규 모델들이 작성한 텍스트에 '워터마크' 추가 계획 -이는 EU의 AI Act법 준수를 위한 것으로 다른 주요 AI 개발사들도 Code of Practice에 서명하여 워터마크가 도입될 것으로 보임 -워터마크는 Claude의 답변 품질이나 내용에 영향을 주지않으며 사람 눈에는 보이지 않지만 AI가 단어를 고르는 패턴에 특정 흔적을 남기는 방식 -전용 탐지기를 통해서 볼 시 Claude가 작성했다라는 가능성 통계패턴을 남기는 방향
🟢 드디어 나올 기미가 보이는 Aligned Aligned가 금일 새벽 코인베이스 로드맵에 등록되었습니다. 참고로 토크노믹스는 이미 한참 전에 나와있고 8.74%가 에어드랍에 할당되어 있습니다. 에어드랍 체커는 예전에 이미 공개된지 꽤 됐으니 궁금하신 분들은 다시 한 번 체크해보셔도 될 듯하네요. TGE 유통량은 16% 정도?
[속보] 최태원, '노소영에 9440억원 지급' 불복…다시 대법으로 https://n.news.naver.com/article/119/0003122052?type=breakingnews
❤2
Kii 상장완료 FDV 약 150M 정도
❤1
아아... 비콘 이녀석.... 결국 이렇게 됐구나😪 자금 조달에 실패해서 팀 인원 줄이고, TGE를 무기한으로 미루며, 게임 완성에 집중하겠다는 공지가 떴네요... 😪 썬셋은 아니지만은... 아무래도 이 시점에 추가투자 넣는 사람들은 구하기 힘들었을 것이고... 비콘도 꽤 오래된 프로젝트다보니 이렇게 된듯 합니다. (기억하실지 모르겠지만, 얘 아비트럼 TGE 전쯤에 나와서 비콘 플레이 다계정 돌렸던 사람들은 이후 계정당 아비트럼 875개씩 얻어걸렸음.. 아비트럼 뽀찌만 약 천불어치) 전문내용이 궁금하신 분들은 읽어보세요. 오늘 The Beacon의 미래에 관한 중요한 소식을 전합니다. 지난 몇 달 동안 저희는 게임을 완성하고, 구상했던 생태계를 구축하며, 건전한 토큰을 출시하는 데 필요한 자원을 확보하기 위해 가능한 모든 방법을 시도…
🟢 DappOS 스토리텔러 기여자 발표 및 지갑 수집안내 폐지줍기 연구소 채널이 19위로 DappOS 스토리텔러 입상을 하게되었습니다. 봇 사용 의심 계정을 제외한 실제 DappOS 게시글에 댓글을 달아주신 분 중 20분의 기여자를 뽑았습니다. ✅ 기여자 명단 @mariokim1984 @gumachuurp @blazestar2 @dorami404 @chanii999 @flower197412 @successkey0219 @jungdk @graphaaaa @Dmb063 @kbh1772 @wseok2527 @jelo1445 @sunginlee @tnwjdv13 @bluelock3434 @DaengDaengs @soosung2 @Hellchang2 @ldkldh 해당 당첨자 분들은 금일 자정까지 @cek_94 로 보상을 수령하실 개인지갑 주…
❤8
🟢 XRP Seoul 2026 행사 당첨자 안내 ✅ 당첨자 명단 @Hoodie3542 @JH921005 @jschem95 @Dove2662 @djjdjdejejd @saynononono @chunbokss @go9ryu @Sigma79001 @cosmolin2 당첨자분들께는 개인 DM으로 코드 및 등록방법을 전달드렸습니다. DM 꼭 확인해주시고 혹 타 채널과 중복당첨이시면 말씀주시면 감사하겠습니다!
❤4
🟢 업비트, TT, JASMY, STORJ 상장폐지 그래 이제 구시대의 유물들 보내줘야겠지...
🟢 $Kii 주요 토크노믹스 -커뮤니티 인센티브 및 밸리데이터 리워드: 50.444% -에코시스템: 15.503% -에어드랍: 7% -퍼블릭세일: 0.736% 초기 유통량은 약 18% 정도고 에어드랍 물량 및 세일 물량이 풀릴 예정이라 대응하실 분들은 참고하시면 좋을 듯 하네요.
❤1
🟢 KiiChain, $Kii 금일 상장 예정 #kol 어제 잠깐 다루긴했지만 Kii 세일 종료 후 바로 상장이 진행 될 예정입니다. -일정: 8월 14일 (금) 22시 -주요 상장거래소: Bybit, 바이낸스 알파, Kraken 등 생각보다 굉장히 속전속결이라 기대해보는 중...
😲 이번에 캄브리아에서 일어난 낚시 사태에 대해 일단 정리 간략하게 해봅시다. 낚시 시스템 출시 1. USDC > 키 > 미끼 > 자루 > 확률로 젬 or 카드 > 키 > USDC 구조 2. 저 자루에는 등급이 T1부터 T4까지 있었는데, T4는 최대 만불까지 뽑을 수 있는 젬을 줬음. (T1젬은 1~10불, T4젬은 1~10000불) 3. 당연히, RTP (Return to Player)를 98% 언더로 맞춰놓고 운좋으면 튀기기 가능하도록 설계 4. 캄브리아가 늘 그런걸 알고 있던 유저들은 T4 뽑기 고배수 도박장에 진입 5. 운좋은 사람들은 크게 벌고 아닌사람은 쪽박치는 리얼 도박낚시 개장 그러던 중 6. T1 자루 무한 파밍이 양수 EV (Expected Value)가 나온다는 사실을 몇 사람들이 깨달음 7. 캄브리아 특성 상 이는 …
그래 열심히하자
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 130 posts we hold for @airdr0p_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 6,533 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“폐지줍기 연구소” (@airdr0p_lab), 20,357 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airdr0p_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.