Channel
@TNBfolio
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,657subscribers
+209 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001127010518 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TNBfolio |
| Description | 본 TNB 채널에서 제공하는 자료는 매수&매도에 대한 의견 절대 아니며 투자자 본인의 참고용에 불과 합니다. 모든 매수와 매도에 대한 책임은 본인에게 있습니다. |
| Created | 29 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TNBfolio |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 24,657 | -11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 24,668 | -11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 24,679 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 24,685 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 24,688 | +20 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 24,668 | +4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:15 | 24,664 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 24,669 | +26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 24,643 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:47 | 24,652 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 24,653 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 24,658 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 24,656 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 24,648 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 24,643 | +9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 24,634 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 24,638 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 24,640 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 24,646 | +7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 24,639 | first reading |
393 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 393 (4 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 292,660 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
G7, 유가 안정 위해 디젤·원유 최대 1억 배럴 비축유 방출 결정 - Bloomberg (by https://t.me/TNBfolio) - G7 회원국들은 급등하는 연료 가격 안정을 요구한 Donald Trump 미 행정부의 압박에 따라 최대 1억 배럴 규모의 비상 원유 및 디젤 비축유를 방출하기로 합의했다. - 이번 비축유 방출은 IEA(국제에너지기구)의 조율 하에 향후 4개월에 걸쳐 진행될 예정이라고 G7 의장인 Emmanuel Macron 프랑스 대통령이 공식 발표했다. - 이번 조치는 유럽 국가들이 공급을 확대하지 않을 경우 미국이 치명적인 디젤 수출 금지 조치를 단행할 수 있다는 압박을 가한 직후 확정되었다. - 지난 3월 이란 전쟁 발발 직후 IEA가 4억 배럴 방출을 조율했으나, Donald Trump 대통령은 유럽의 공급 집행…
코스닥 신용잔고
코스피 신용잔고
Photo, posted without a caption
9월 파라다이스 & GKL & 롯데관광개발 카지노 매출액
File, posted without a caption
어제 중국 석유제품 수출 중단 늬우스
어제 중국 미국 러시아의 석유제품 수출 통제 뉴스 이후 등경유 마진이 급등하고 있습니다. *정제마진 일간 기준 42.9$/bbl로 재차 40$ 상회하기 시작 **등유/경유 마진이 각각 +11$/5$ 상승하며 정제마진 강세 견인. 휘발유 또한 +9$ 상승 ***주간 평균 기준(월~목) 37.4$/bbl로 지난 주 평균 대비 +5.3$/bbl 상승
File, posted without a caption
한국 9월 인플레이션 2.9% 기록, 전월 대비 둔화 - Breaking the News (by https://t.me/TNBfolio) - 한국의 9월 소비자물가지수(CPI)는 120.43을 기록했다고 통계 당국이 발표했다. - 9월 CPI는 전년 동월 대비 2.9% 상승하며 8월의 3.1% 상승에서 둔화세를 나타냈다. - 전월 대비로는 0.3% 상승한 것으로 집계되었다. https://breakingthenews.net/Article/S.-Korean-inflation-down-from-3.1-to-2.9-in-September/67220201
도쿄 9월 인플레이션 2.7% 기록, 전월 대비 상승폭 확대 - Breaking the News (by https://t.me/TNBfolio) - Statistics Bureau of Japan에 따르면 9월 도쿄 23구(Ku-area)의 연간 인플레이션율이 전월 1.9%에서 2.7%로 상승했다. - 신선식품을 제외한 근원 소비자물가지수(CPI)는 전월 1.8%에서 2.7%로 상승 폭을 키웠다. - 신선식품과 에너지를 모두 제외한 근원-근원 CPI는 3.0%를 기록했다. https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Tokyo's-inflation-up-from-1.9-to-2.7-in-September/67220268
[26년 10월 1일 한국 뉴스] 1. 반도체주 강세에 닛케이 3%대 급등 마감 2. 대만 9월 제조업 PMI AI 수요로 5년만 최고 3. 대만 증시 한미 반도체 호조로 사상최고 경신 마감 4. 10월 국고채 발행물량 5조원 축소 및 추가 축소 검토 5. 서울 아파트값 상승세 둔화와 강남권 및 11개구 하락 6. 100MW급 AI 데이터센터 생산유발효과 최대 3.5조원 7. 로봇의 육체노동 74% 대체 가능하나 비용 효율 낮음 8. 아이온2 글로벌 스팀 1위 석권으로 흥행 기대 9. 네이버 웨일 브라우저 사이드바용 AI 챗 정식 출시 10. 휴온스 mRNA 점안제 및 ADC 항암제 공동개발 추진 https://naver.me/5FDSddJT (전문은 링크 참조)
Showing the 12 most recent of 393 posts we hold for @TNBfolio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 49 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 45 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TNBfolio” (@TNBfolio), 24,657 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TNBfolio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.