Photo, posted without a caption
❤6

Channel
@stockinvcowcow
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,059subscribers
-519 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001726574370 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stockinvcowcow |
| Created | 17 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stockinvcowcow |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 14,059 | -38 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 14,097 | -22 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 14,119 | -17 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 14,136 | -31 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 14,167 | -35 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 14,202 | -15 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 14,217 | -22 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 14,239 | -18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:33 | 14,257 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 14,274 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 14,284 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 14,291 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 14,300 | -15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 14,315 | -19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 14,334 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 14,346 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 14,357 | -21 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 14,378 | -23 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 14,401 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 14,410 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
159 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71 | 44.7% | |
| 😢 | 56 | 35.2% | |
| 😱 | 18 | 11.3% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 5.66% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 3.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6
https://www.autodaily.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=545764 금융권에 따르면 이번 사태에서 가장 큰 피해를 입은 계층은 20~30대 개인투자자였다. 전체 파산 또는 강제청산 계좌 가운데 약 62%가 20~30대 투자자로 집계됐으며, 고위험 레버리지 상품 투자 비중이 높았던 젊은 투자자들의 피해가 집중된 것으로 분석됐다. » 2030세대가 걱정...
😱9❤1
https://news.nate.com/view/20260726n15335?isq=11402&mid=n0104 호르무즈 해에서 유조선이 기뢰와 충돌해 폭발했다고 이란 타스님 통신이 현지시간 26일 보도했습니다. 타스님 통신은 이 유조선이 이란이 지정한 항로를 벗어나 운항하던 중 기뢰를 건드렸다고 전했습니다. 이란 당국은 "이란이 발표한 지정 항로를 이탈할 경우, 그에 따른 모든 결과와 책임은 전적으로 해당 선박 측에 있다"며 경고한 바 있습니다. » 이제 기름을 어디서 가져와야 하나...
❤1
https://v.daum.net/v/20260727070320143 - 외신 “메타, RE100 탈퇴 - 신규 가스발전 투자로 기준 충족 불가” - 하이퍼스케일러, 잇단 가스발전 투자 - 韓 메가프로젝트도 마주할 ‘딜레마’ - 정부 “2029년 8.4GW 규모 AIDC 건설” - 전문가들 “AIDC 전력공급 위해 - LNG발전 건설·석탄발전 가동률 제고” 전망 - “대규모 AIDC, 산업적 가치 불분명” 비판도
불안한 유가
26년 6월 투자자 설명회 CFO Anat Ashkenazi • 2026년 CapEx: 1,800억~1,900억 달러 • 2027년 CapEx는 2026년보다 ‘상당히(significantly)’ 증가할 것 Q1 CapEx • 35.7B Q2 CapEx • 44.9B 상반기 누적 • 약 80.6B 26년 7월 2Q 실발 Capex 가이던스 • 2026년 Capex = 1,800-1,900억 => 1,950-2,050억 달러(상향) • 2027년 Capex = 2026년보다 ‘상당히(significantly)’ 증가할 것(유지)
❤2
순환참조 추가
❤1
AMD와 앤스로픽, 대형 AI 칩 공급 및 투자 계약 체결 2기가와트(GW) 규모의 계약에는 수백억 달러 상당의 칩 공급이 포함되며, AMD는 앤스로픽에 최대 50억 달러를 투자할 계획이다. AMD(Advanced Micro Devices)와 앤스로픽(Anthropic)이 수백억 달러 규모의 인공지능(AI) 서버 공급 계약을 체결했습니다. 이번 거래를 통해 AMD는 업계 선두인 엔비디아(Nvidia)에 맞서 경쟁력을 강화하고, 앤스로픽은 시급히 필요했던 연산 능력을 확보하게 되었습니다. 계약 조건에 따라 앤스로픽은 2027년 상반기부터 AMD의 최신 세대 칩인 '인스틴트 MI450(Instinct MI450)'을 최대 2기가와트(GW) 규모까지 구매할 예정입니다. 또한 AMD는 특정 배포 마일스톤(단계별 목표)이 달성됨에 따라 앤스로픽…
❤2
오늘 증시 요약
😢11
블룸버그 “삼성전자, 美 ADR 상장 재검토” | 서울경제 - https://m.sedaily.com/article/20067657
🔥8❤1😢1
https://m.blog.naver.com/rudghks669/224346466622
👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
😢3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stockinvcowcow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“영리한 동물원” (@stockinvcowcow), 14,059 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stockinvcowcow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.