Channel
@stockgrandmaster
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,891subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001487275363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stockgrandmaster |
| Description | 시장에서 최적의 매매 타이밍을 포착하기 위한 전략 |
| Created | 21 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stockgrandmaster |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 10,891 | +12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 10,879 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 10,877 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 10,883 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 10,880 | +17 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 10,863 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 10,865 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 10,866 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 10,863 | first reading |
71 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 68 of 71 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 71 (4 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 102,831 |
| Reactions total | 526 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
526 reactions across 68 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 242 | 46.0% | |
| 👏 | 190 | 36.1% | |
| 👍 | 58 | 11.0% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 4.18% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 2.66% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 526reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
# 진위 확인은 어려우나 베센트가 실질적인 미국의 방향성을 알려주는 인물이라 조금 부담이 되네요 # 부디 합의를 이끌어 내기 위한 강한 압박이길 바랍니다. 미국 재무장관 스콧 베센트가 현지시간 13일 밤 미국이 이란을 상대로 “전례 없는” 조치를 시행할 것이라고 밝힘. 베센트 장관은 인터뷰에서 “전례 없는 경제적 고립 조치와 호르무즈 해협에 대한 지속적인 봉쇄를 결합해 이란 항구로 들어오고 나가는 모든 통로를 차단할 것입니다. 다음 주 발표될 추가 조치를 주목해 주십시오”라고 밝힘.
🔥10❤3🥰1
# 미국시장 S&P500지수 및 러셀2000지수가 신고가를 갱신한가운데 반도체종목들도 키맞추기 반등이 나오고 있습니다 # 주요 리스크 지표들은 CPI와 PPI의 하락으로 모두 안정적인 모습이며 국채금리가 20일선을 소폭이지만 이탈한부분이 시장에는 특히 긍정적으로 보여집니다. # 아시아시장은 대만과 일본이 미국과 키맞추기를 하며 강하게 반등하고 있는데 기술적인 저항대인 피보나치 하락폭의 61.8% 되돌림구간과 60일선을 모두 돌파하였고 # 한국도 외국인의 2일연속 매수세에 힘입어 최근 하락폭의 38.2%를 되돌렸는데 필반지수와 유사한 반등폭이 가능하다고 한다면 코스피는 약 7300, 코스닥은 910정도까지도 기술적 반등이 가능해 보입니다. # 미국의 섹터를 보시면 기존에는 주도섹터간 변화가 심했는데 지금은 키맞추기 우상향 흐름이 이어지다…
❤12👏2🔥1🥰1
# 서버관련 업종도 반등세 유지 # 델 서버1위는 신고가 # 마벨, 인텔도 서버관련주도 20일선 돌파후 5일선 유지하며 반등세 # WD 서버 저장장치도 120일선 지지되며 20일선까지 반등
❤5👍2👏2
# 반도체 장비/후공정 램리서치, ASE 등 20일선 돌파하는 반등세 # 메모리 샌디스크, 마이크론도 20일선 돌파하는 반등세
❤5👏2👍1
# 소프트웨어 업종 가장 강한 모습. 주도흐름지속 # 엔비디아 전고점인근까지 상승, TSMC도 반등흐름 유지 # 빅테크(하이퍼스케일러)는 쉬어감 # 가치주(금융, 소재, 방산, 제약)도 쉬어감
❤5👍1👏1
# 외국인 만기일 종가막판 매수폭 줄이긴 했으나 연전히 이틀연속 강한 매수세 VS 개인 매도세 # 아직은 긍정적인 수급상황
👏5❤2
# S&P500지수 및 러셀2000지수 신고가 # 나스닥지수 전고점 인근까지 반등 # 필반지수 최근 하락폭의 50% 되돌렸으나 60일선에서 지속저항 # 일본, 대만지수는 61.8% 이상 되돌리며 60일선도 돌파하여 V자 반등세 # 한국지수는 최근 하락폭의 38.2% 되돌리며 코스피 120일선 저항 코스닥은 하락하는 60일선이 저항대 -> 그래도 미국시장과 일본/대만시장의 상승으로 키맞추기 반등흐름이 이어지고 있음
❤4👏1🥰1
# VIX변동성지표 안정적 하락흐름 지속 # WTI유가도 20일선 소폭이탈하며 80불 초반 # 미10년국채금리 20일선 소폭이탈하며 하락 # 달러인덱스 120일선 지지되며 반등시도하나 미약함 -> 리스크 지표들 아직은 시장에 긍정적인 모습
❤4👏2
' 못오른 코스피와 반도체섹터의 키맞추기 반등세' ' 고베타 AI서버데이타센터관련 미국상장주식들의 높은 실적과 성장세로 반도체섹터 우려 감소 및 VKOSPI와 레버리지축소로 꼬인수급 완화' # 미국시장 주요 리스크 지표는 모두 안정적인 모습인 가운데 다우지수는 약했으나 중소형 러셀지수가 신고가를 갱신하며 반도체 종목들이 강하게 반등했습니다. # 섹터를 보면 그동안 강했던 하이퍼스케일러와 소프트웨어는 차익실현이 나오는 모습이고 # 네비우스, 루멘텀, 코어위브, SMCI 등 서버 및 데이타센터 인프라와 관련된 종목들이 호실적과 전망을 발표하며 급등함에 따라 반도체에 대한 우려가 감소하며 필반지수가 60일선까지 반등시도를 하였습니다 # 국내의 경우도 전자와 닉스가 8월안에 대규모 주주환원책을 발표할것으로 기대하고 있어 최근 미국 고베타 …
❤7🔥2👏1🥰1
# AMAT, ASE, TSMC 등 반도체장비, 후공정, 파운드리 모두 20일선 돌파 # 샌디스크, 마이크론 등 메모리관련주도 20일선까지 반등
❤7👏1
# 델 서버1위 신고가 # 인텔, 마벨 등 서버관련주 20일선 돌파 # WD 서버저장장치 120일선 지지되며 반등시도
❤6👏2
# 베스타스 풍력 전고점까지 상승 # 이튼 송배전 전력주도 신고가 갱신후 눌림 # 블룸에너지 수소전지, GE베르노바 가스터빈발전 등도 20일선 돌파하는 반등
👏9❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @stockgrandmaster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 786,542 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“실전매매전략 : 마켓타이밍” (@stockgrandmaster), 10,891 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stockgrandmaster.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.