아는 것 없고 인사이트 없고 주식도 못해서 다른 분들의 좋은 자료들을 엄선해서 스크랩하는 채널입니다.
스크랩한다고 해서 제 의견이 아닙니다.
* 본 채널의 게시물은 단순 의견 및 기록용으로 매수-매도 등 투자권유를 의미하지 않습니다.
해당 게시물의 내용은 부정확할 수 있으며 매매에 따른 손실은 거래 당사자의 책임입니다.
해당 게시물의 내용은 어떤 경우에도 법적 근거로 사용될 수 없습니다.
Created
30 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 31 of the 31 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 380 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 97 days, net -98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,645–10,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 15:00
10,663
-9
10 Nov 2026, 10:36
10,672
-4
8 Nov 2026, 23:06
10,676
-1
6 Nov 2026, 19:11
10,677
-4
4 Nov 2026, 17:16
10,681
-6
3 Nov 2026, 16:07
10,687
-3
2 Nov 2026, 14:09
10,690
-1
1 Nov 2026, 15:45
10,691
-5
31 Oct 2026, 14:01
10,696
-1
30 Oct 2026, 16:49
10,697
-5
29 Oct 2026, 15:11
10,702
-1
28 Oct 2026, 13:20
10,703
+1
27 Oct 2026, 14:49
10,702
-3
26 Oct 2026, 13:45
10,705
-2
25 Oct 2026, 15:59
10,707
+1
24 Oct 2026, 17:35
10,706
-8
23 Oct 2026, 14:14
10,714
-3
22 Oct 2026, 15:59
10,717
-3
21 Oct 2026, 11:48
10,720
+3
20 Oct 2026, 06:11
10,717
first reading
Engagement
784 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.58%
avg views ÷ 10,663 subscribers
Avg views / post
382
268 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.518%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
268
of 784 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 133 of 268 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
784 (7 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
102,387
Reactions total
270
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 22:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈43,100
Videos
≈765
Links
≈62,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 47s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
715 reactions across 305 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
169
23.6%
👍
124
17.3%
😁
121
16.9%
🖕
114
15.9%
💩
58
8.11%
🤮
46
6.43%
👎
23
3.22%
🤬
12
1.68%
🍌
10
1.40%
💯
9
1.26%
😱
6
0.839%
👌
4
0.559%
🤣
4
0.559%
😢
3
0.42%
👏
2
0.28%
😈
2
0.28%
😭
2
0.28%
🙏
2
0.28%
🎃
1
0.14%
🔥
1
0.14%
2 further kinds
2
0.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 324 of the 784 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 715 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 784 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 268 posts held from the last 30 days (0.373%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
[Alice Huang 연계 기업, DeepSeek 투자…Blackwell 공급 관계 구축 목적]
*Alice Huang 연계 기업, DeepSeek 2차 펀딩 참여
-The Information은 Alice Huang과 가족관계 및 과거 기업거래로 연결된 Century Litong과 모회사 Jiangsu Lettall Electronics가 최근 DeepSeek에 투자했다고 보도
-DeepSeek 측은 7~10월 진행된 2차 펀딩 과정에서 두 회사를 투자자들에게 소개한 것으로 전해짐
-해당 기업들은 특수목적법인(SPV)을 통해 투자해 DeepSeek의 직접 주주 명단에는 이름이 나타나지 않음
*투자 목적에 Blackwell 공급 관계 포함
-보도에 따르면 DeepSeek 관계자들은 Century Litong과 Lettall이 중국에서…
#속보
#중국 스파이(앨리스 황)의 기업이 중국 AI 기업 '딥시크'에 투자한 것으로 알려져
1) 자... 이제 타겟은 중국 AI 기업으로 확대됐습니다.
2) 당연히 오픈웨이트 모델로도 화살이 향할 것입니다.
3) 트럼프 정부의 대중 외교는 #언론 과 의회의 견제 속 사실상 좌초됐습니다.
#지정학
엔비디아, 대규모 경영진 개편 발표:
🔸 젠슨 황, CEO, 사장 및 이사회 멤버직 즉시 사임
🔸 콜레트 크레스 엔비디아 CFO, 임시 CEO 임명(CFO 직무 유지)
🔸 하비 C. 존스, 이사회 의장 임명
🔸 내부 및 외부 후보 고려하여 차기 CEO 물색 시작
황의 사임으로 그가 공동 창립한 AI 칩 거대 기업에서의 33년 경영 시대가 막을 내림
예정대로 11월 17일 화요일에 2027 회계연도 3분기 실적 발표 예정
🏢 [에이프릴바이오] (15:28)
12,220원 (🔵-1.45%) | 시총 3,368억
에이프릴바이오 "APB-A1, 룬드벡 파이프라인 유지"
📄 에이프릴바이오가 덴마크 제약사 룬드벡에 기술수출한 신약 후보물질 'APB-A1(Lu AG22515)'이 갑상선안병증(TED) 임상 개발 중단 이후에도 룬드벡 주요 파이프라인에 이름을 올렸다. 룬드벡은 11일 공개한 2026년...
에보뮨 "에이프릴바이오 EVO301 SC제형, 생체이용률 긍정적"
지가 파텔(Jeegar Patel) 에보뮨 최고과학책임자(CSO)는 지난 11일(현지시간) 열린 '스티펠 헬스케어 콘퍼런스 2026'에서 EVO301의 피하주사 제형 개발 현황을 설명했다.
파텔 CSO는 "비인간 영장류에서 정맥주사와 피하주사의 생체이용률을 비교해 확인했으며, 결과가 매우 긍정적이었다"고 밝혔다.
이어 "고농도 피하주사 제형을 개발했으며, 정맥주사와 비슷하거나 더 높은 약물 노출 수준을 달성할 가능성이 있다"며 "4주 간격 투여도 가능할 것으로 기대한다"고 말했다.
https://www.press9.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=86182
Showing the 12 most recent of 784 posts we hold for @bbanjil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 784 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
선수촌 @athletes_village · 22,145 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
서화백의 그림놀이 🚀 @easobi · 23,419 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치 @FastStockNewsUSA · 41,039 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
타점 읽어주는 여자(타자) @tazastock · 40,978 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西 @YeouidoStory2 · 57,976 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
⚡️번개맞은뉴스 - 상위2% 주식텔레그램 채널 @stock_messenger · 25,223 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
AWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널 @darthacking · 65,571 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀 @SmallCap · 22,982 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
주식 급등일보🚀급등테마·대장주 탐색기 | Korean Stocks @FastStockNews · 128,811 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
간절한 투자스터디카페 @desperatestudycafe · 18,510 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실 @Jstockclass · 26,508 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
피카츄 아저씨⚡️ @pikachu_aje · 24,917 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
TNBfolio @TNBfolio · 25,163 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
선진짱 주식공부방 @sunstudy1111 · 55,218 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
YIELD & SPREAD @yieldnspread · 22,083 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
재야의 고수들 @gaoshoukorea · 41,185 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
HS아카데미 대표 이효석 @HS_academy · 36,206 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
기술적 분석으로 보는 주식시장 (by 소라게아빠) @hermitcrab41_1 · 21,506 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
카이에 de market @cahier_de_market · 23,110 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
💯똥밭에 굴러도 주식판 @daegurr · 23,789 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관] @merITz_tech · 24,857 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
김찰저의 관심과 생각 저장소 @kimcharger · 25,261 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환 @HANAchina · 35,273 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver @pharmbiohana · 29,789 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)” (@bbanjil), 10,663 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbanjil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.