Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 투자자문 와이즈리서치 경제공부방

Channel

투자자문 와이즈리서치 경제공부방

@econostudy

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,422subscribers

-199 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001721051400
TypeChannel
Username@econostudy
Description와이즈리서치 경제공부방 투자자문사가 직접 운영하는 무료 투자정보 채널 반도체·산업분석 | 기업탐방 | 실적분석 | 경제뉴스 | 공개계좌
Created23 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/econostudy

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@econostudy/33076 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 23:03 UTC@gaoshoukorea/655615 Nov 2026, 23:06 UTC1.003 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@KiwoomResearch13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 minutes@KiwoomResearch (13–0)
@hedgecat030110 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0013 minutes@hedgecat0301 (10–0)
@gaoshoukorea6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minuteseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 247 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,4228,6218,521.56 August 2026 — 8,621 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,621 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,620 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,618 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,609 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,600 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,597 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,586 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,572 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,562 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,564 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,562 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,558 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,550 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,538 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,512 subscribers6 October 2026 — 8,492 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,482 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,474 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,471 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,464 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,456 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,444 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,437 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,432 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,435 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,428 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,422 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 97 days, net -199. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,392–8,651 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 17:178,422-6
7 Nov 2026, 12:488,428-7
4 Nov 2026, 12:178,435+3
1 Nov 2026, 16:468,432-5
30 Oct 2026, 03:098,437-7
26 Oct 2026, 17:188,444-12
23 Oct 2026, 18:468,456-8
21 Oct 2026, 02:298,464-7
18 Oct 2026, 10:458,471-3
15 Oct 2026, 20:218,474-8
12 Oct 2026, 18:168,482-10
6 Oct 2026, 04:368,492-20
28 Sept 2026, 13:368,512-26
19 Sept 2026, 03:188,538-12
14 Sept 2026, 19:228,550-8
11 Sept 2026, 10:408,558-4
7 Sept 2026, 03:378,562-2
2 Sept 2026, 01:428,564+2
30 Aug 2026, 09:178,562-10
27 Aug 2026, 01:548,572first reading

Engagement

363 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.49%
avg views ÷ 8,422 subscribers
Avg views / post
378
167 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.325%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
169
of 363 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 167 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held363 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total63,197
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 13:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,500
Videos
≈18
Links
≈19,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 50 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6880.0%
👍1315.3%
😭22.35%
👏11.18%
🤣11.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 363 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 363 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 169 posts held from the last 30 days (0.592%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 11:06 UTC278 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026

시장의 불확실성보다 중요한 것은 기업의 실적과 가치입니다. 최근 글로벌 증시에서는 AI 산업을 둘러싼 불확실성이 커지고 있습니다. 젠슨 황의 퇴진에 따른 엔비디아의 리더십 변화, AI 생태계의 순환금융 구조에 대한 우려, 미국 정치 지형의 변화까지 여러 요인이 시장의 불안감을 자극하고 있습니다. 특히 AI 산업은 막대한 자본투자를 기반으로 성장해 왔기 때문에 자금조달 구조가 흔들린다면 향후 투자 속도가 둔화될 가능성도 있습니다. 저 역시 이러한 위험을 가볍게 생각하지 않습니다. 다만 AI 산업의 성장 속도가 둔화되는 것과 관련 기업들의 실적이 악화되는 것은 반드시 같은 의미가 아닙니다. 최근 저는 보유 기업들의 3분기 실적을 하나씩 업데이트하고 있습니다. 그 과정에서 오히려 긍정적인 변화들을 확인하고 있습니다. 실적 개선이 본격화…

❤1

14 Nov 2026, 08:06 UTC371 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [미디어경쟁] (업데이트) 파라마운트·워너 합병 소장 보완 출처: TheWrap·THR (발행 06:59) #미디어합병 #스트리밍 #반독점 #파라마운트 #HBO맥스 ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

14 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC416 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [폐열활용] NTT, 데이터센터 폐열로 새우 양식 실증 출처: DCD·NTT도코모비즈니스 (발행 14:00) #데이터센터 #폐열활용 #육상양식 #에너지효율 #NTT ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

14 Nov 2026, 06:05 UTC420 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [반도체지원] TSMC, 해외공장 보조금 1~9월 1,676억대만달러 출처: 중앙통신사·TSMC (발행 13:52) #반도체 #해외공장 #정부보조금 #공급망 #TSMC ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

14 Nov 2026, 04:10 UTC427 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [재생에너지] 인도 FPEL, 태양광·풍력 3개 사업 협약 출처: ET EnergyWorld·FPEL (발행 02:39) #재생에너지 #인도 #태양광 #풍력 #기업전력 ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

14 Nov 2026, 04:10 UTC394 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [자동차부품] 일본 토프레, 미 차체부품 설비 1.4억달러 투자 출처: 닛케이아시아·토프레 공시 (발행 04:57) #자동차부품 #미국생산 #하이브리드 #설비투자 #토프레 ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

14 Nov 2026, 03:05 UTC394 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [핵연료] 독일 정부, 우렌코 지분 3분의 1 인수 추진 보도 출처: OilPrice·로이터 (발행 03:30) #핵연료 #우렌코 #독일 #우라늄농축 #지분인수 ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

14 Nov 2026, 03:04 UTC339 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [철강] (업데이트) 스텔코, 해밀턴 재가동·175명 복직 출처: CHCH·스텔코 (발행 03:18) #철강 #스텔코 #캐나다 #고용유지 #공장재가동 ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

14 Nov 2026, 02:06 UTC336 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [축산통상] 미 양고기 수입 조사 3대3…무역구제 심사 계속 출처: ABC·미 USITC (발행 05:07) #양고기 #세이프가드 #미국통상 #호주 #축산물 ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

14 Nov 2026, 01:13 UTC369 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [경유보조금] (업데이트) 브라질, 수입 경유 추가 보조금 미연장 출처: 로이터 (발행 07:04) #브라질 #경유 #보조금 #연료수입 #에너지정책 ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

14 Nov 2026, 01:12 UTC323 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [전력요금] 오리건, 신규 데이터센터에 전력 공급비용 직접 부과 출처: KTVZ (발행 05:48) #데이터센터 #전력요금 #전력인프라 #오리건 #퍼시픽파워 ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

14 Nov 2026, 00:10 UTC378 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📌 [통신주파수] (업데이트) 미 C밴드 경매, 신청·납부 일정 확정 출처: Light Reading·FCC (발행 05:15) #통신주파수 #C밴드 #5G #통신장비 #FCC ✅ 투자자문사 와이즈리서치

Showing the 12 most recent of 363 posts we hold for @econostudy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

흥국증권 리서치센터
@lovequant · 4,516
6 posts
Rafiki research
@rafikiresearch · 20,656
6 posts
다올투자증권 리서치센터
@daolresearch · 4,750
5 posts
신한 리서치
@shinhanresearch · 21,838
5 posts
[대신증권 리서치]
@dsrsc · 2,071
4 posts
하나증권 리서치
@HanaResearch · 25,158
4 posts
키움증권 리서치센터
@KiwoomResearch · 19,957
4 posts
SK증권 Research
@sksresearch · 9,669
4 posts
키움증권 신민수 의료기기 기록보관소
@sms_archive · 3,320
4 posts
상상인증권 투자전략팀 신얼/김경태/최예찬/강혜성
@ssi_macro · 734
4 posts
다올 의료기기/화장품 박종현
@alexppark · 8,614
3 posts
IBK투자증권 기업분석부
@Ibks_innovation_research · 2,806
3 posts
[하나 이준호] AI/디지털자산/인터넷/게임
@internetgameLJH · 4,464
3 posts
하나 IT 김록호,김현수,김민경
@ITforYouFromHana · 13,302
3 posts
[신한 리서치본부] 혁신성장
@shsmallcap · 5,698
3 posts
키움 음식료/유통 박상준
@sjpark_sobi · 2,820
3 posts
SK증권 스몰캡 리서치
@sk_smallcap · 4,701
3 posts
상상인증권 리서치
@ssi_research · 2,843
3 posts
한화 엔터/레저/운송 박수영
@airswimmy · 2,850
2 posts
한화 Research 금융 김도하
@dh_finance · 4,935
2 posts
허재환 유진증권 전략
@huhjae · 12,999
2 posts
[대신증권 류형근/김진형] 반도체
@hyungkeunryu · 8,960
2 posts
IBK투자증권 리서치 투자분석부
@IBKS_investment_research_dept · 1,318
2 posts
교보증권 리서치센터
@KyoboRSC · 8,311
2 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rafiki research
@rafikiresearch · 20,656
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
선수촌
@athletes_village · 22,145
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
그로쓰리서치(Growth Research) [독립리서치]
@growthresearch · 40,071
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
Yeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,450
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
시장 이야기 by 제이슨
@bumgore · 35,362
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西
@YeouidoStory2 · 57,976
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,110
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
피카츄 아저씨⚡️
@pikachu_aje · 24,917
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
타점 읽어주는 여자(타자)
@tazastock · 40,978
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
선진짱 주식공부방
@sunstudy1111 · 55,218
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Buff
@bufkr · 21,563
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실
@Jstockclass · 26,508
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
오를주식 - 뉴스/경제/주식
@GoUpstock · 21,091
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
실시간 주식 뉴스
@realtime_stock_news · 36,956
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
YM리서치
@ym_research · 39,801
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
AWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널
@darthacking · 65,784
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
[하나증권 ETF] 박승진
@globaletfi · 20,610
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,185
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,295
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,488
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
💯똥밭에 굴러도 주식판
@daegurr · 23,789
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
시황맨의 주식이야기
@shmstory · 39,621
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
회색인간의 매크로 + 투자
@mistergray_11 · 19,794
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
기술적 분석으로 보는 주식시장 (by 소라게아빠)
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,506
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“투자자문 와이즈리서치 경제공부방” (@econostudy), 8,422 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/econostudy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.