Channel
@bestyeezus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,267subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001539173377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bestyeezus |
| Created | 11 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bestyeezus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 2,267 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 2,268 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 2,268 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,968 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌎 SpaceX 2Q26 실적발표 핵심요약 Part 3 4️⃣ QnA 하이라이트 1. 스타십(Starship) 관련 질문 ① 13차 비행 학습 내용 ㉠ 히트 실드 문제 해결 확인, 회수 및 분석 예정 ㉡ 다음 비행에서 스타십 회수 시도 예정 ② 인간 탐승을 위한 안전성 확보 ㉠ 위성 발사 안정성 확보 후 인간 탑승 추진, 내년 말까지 안전 수준 달성 목표 ③ 히트 실드 문제 해결 여부 ㉠ 히트 실드 문제는 해결된 것으로 판단, 지속적인 개선은 이루어질 것 ㉡ 완전하고 빠른 재사용을 위한 기술적 장애물 없음 2. 스타링크(Starlink) 관련 질문 ① 기업 및 정부 계약 백로그 및 성장 전망 ㉠ 정부 계약 60억 달러 이상 확보, 추가 역량 확보 위한 계약 진행 중 ㉡ 기업 고객 이탈률 …
🌎 SpaceX 2Q26 실적발표 핵심요약 Part 2 3️⃣ 주요 기술 및 비전 1. 스타십(Starship)의 혁신적 잠재력 ① 궤도 운송 능력의 비약적 향상 ㉠ 현재 팰컨9으로 연간 약 2,500톤 궤도 운송 ㉡ 스타십으로 연간 100만 톤 이상, 궁극적으로 1,000만 톤 궤도 운송 목표 ㉢ 경쟁사 대비 압도적인 운송 능력 보유 ② 재사용성 및 발사 빈도 증가 ㉠ 13차 비행 성공, 궤도 임무 수행 능력 입증 ㉡ 14차 비행에서 V3 스타링크 위성 최초 배치 예정 ㉢ 올해 안으로 1, 2단 부스터 회수 시도, 다음 비행에서 스타십 회수 가능성 ㉣ 13차 비행에서 히트 실드 문제 해결 확인, 다음 비행에서 타워를 이용한 스타십 회수 시도 예정 ㉤ 향후 1년 내 하루 한 번 이상…
🌎 SpaceX 2Q26 실적발표 핵심요약 Part 1 1️⃣ 실적 요약 1. 전년 동기 대비 매출 및 손실 개선 ① 매출 78억 달러 기록, 전년 동기 대비 92% 증가(41억 달러) * 매출액 컨센서스 약 14.5% 상회 ② 분기 순손실 5억 4,100만 달러로, 전년 동기 대비 4억 6,700만 달러 개선 * EPS 컨센서스 약 62.5% 상회 ③ 조정 EBITDA 35억 달러 기록, 전년 동기 대비 191% 증가(12억 달러) 2. IPO 및 회사채 발행을 통한 재무 건전성 강화 ① IPO를 통해 약 857억 달러의 수익 확보 ② 250억 달러 규모의 투자등급 회사채 발행 완료 ③ 2분기 말 기준 현금 및 시장성 유가증권 1,000억 달러 보유 ④ 475억 달러의 수주 잔고 보유 3. 자본 지출 및 투자 우선순위 ① 2분기 총 …
NFP = + AI - 월드컵(???)
블루엘리펀트는 지난 3일 어펄마캐피탈과 투자 계약을 체결했다. 어펄마캐피탈은 우선 750억원을 투자해 구주와 신주를 인수하고, 6개월 내 250억원의 추가 투자 옵션을 행사할 경우 지분율을 최대 25.8%까지 확보하게 된다. 이번 투자 과정에서 블루엘리펀트는 약 4000억원의 기업가치를 인정받았다. 회사는 글로벌 아이웨어 시장에서의 성장성과 브랜드 경쟁력을 인정받은 결과라고 설명했다. https://m.edaily.co.kr/News/Read?mediaCodeNo=257&newsId=06763366645545024&utm_source=https://n.news.naver.com/article/018/0006346971?sid=101
Photo, posted without a caption
https://www.pinpointnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=475104
지리네 진짜
셀-온
📌 파마리서치(시가총액: 4조 727억) #A214450 📁 연결재무제표기준영업(잠정)실적(공정공시) 2026.08.07 11:22:33 (현재가 : 392,000원, -0.63%) 매출액 : 1,787억(예상치 : 1,680억+/ 6%) 영업익 : 665억(예상치 : 671억/ -1%) 순이익 : 566억(예상치 : 565억/ 0%) **최근 실적 추이** 매출/영업익/순익/예상대비 OP 2026.2Q 1,787억/ 665억/ 566억/ -1% 2026.1Q 1,461억/ 573억/ 487억/ -20% 2025.4Q 1,433억/ 519억/ 393억/ +3% 2025.3Q 1,354억/ 619억/ 509억/ +6% 2025.2Q 1,406억/ 559억/ 420억/ +8% 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf00…
[美 상원, 클래리티법 표결 9월로 연기] 크립토 인 아메리카 진행자 엘리노어테렛이 폴리티코를 인용해 "미국 상원이 클래리티법(CLARITY) 표결을 9월로 연기하기로 결정했다"고 전했다. https://coinness.com/news/1164959
NAVER 2Q26 실적발표 자료
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @bestyeezus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 870,721 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yeezy Invest” (@bestyeezus), 2,267 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bestyeezus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.