Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

피카츄 아저씨⚡️

@pikachu_aje

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25,179subscribers

+52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001786506622
TypeChannel
Username@pikachu_aje
DescriptionAI 시대가 가져올 놀라운 변화 속에서 훌륭한 주식을 좋은 가격에 매수해서 홀딩하여 지속적 수익을 창출합니다. 피카⚡️ Disclaimer: 본 채널에 언급한 종목을 꼭 보유한 것은 아닙니다. 보유하고 있다 하더라도, 시기에 따라 이를 매도했거나 추후 매도할 수 있습니다. 본 채널은 매수/ 매도 추천을 하지 않고, 투자에 대한 책임을 지지 않습니다.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pikachu_aje

Growth

25,11325,17925,1467 August 2026 — 25,127 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,122 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,116 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,113 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,179 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 5 days, net +52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,103–25,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:4725,179+66
11 Aug 2026, 19:2625,113-3
10 Aug 2026, 17:3725,116-6
8 Aug 2026, 12:3525,122-5
7 Aug 2026, 13:3225,127first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 25,179 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,300
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.443%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held43 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total184,820
Reactions total778
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,820
Videos
40
Links
2,780

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

778 reactions across 41 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
778100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 778reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈2,010 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

요약: 단가 높아짐 / 남의 돈으로 건설하기 가능 / 베라 루빈 들어오는 중 / 블룸업

15

12 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,690 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡️ Nebius Group(NBIS) 2Q26 실적 요약 블로그에서 자세히보기: https://blog.naver.com/pikachu_aje/224376885603 카드뉴스로 보기: https://www.thebrink.co.kr/s/4Mh8LzxKcz ① 숫자는 강했습니다. Q2 매출 $582.3M, YoY +454%, QoQ +46% AI Cloud 매출 $574.9M, YoY +514% ARR $3.0B, Q1 $1.9B 대비 +56% Group Adjusted EBITDA $236.2M AI Cloud Adjusted EBITDA $285.7M AI Cloud EBITDA Margin 49.7% Q2 CapEx $5.7B 결국 NBIS는 이제 매출만 폭증하는 단계가 아니라 AI Cloud 사업 자체가 상당한 EBITDA를 내

6

12 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC≈1,670 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.thebrink.co.kr/s/rV8kDA0aEB 피카츄 아저씨⚡️

6

12 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,780 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

블룸에너지가 컨콜에서 얘기하는 내용을 보면 무소음+친환경이 지역 사회 반대를 낮춘다고 얘기합니다 https://blog.naver.com/pikachu_aje/224324021282 4-4. 지역사회 수용성 → 해석: CEO는 데이터센터와 온사이트 발전설비가 늘어날수록 지역사회가 “이 시설이 좋은 이웃인가”를 묻게 될 것이라고 설명했습니다. Bloom 시스템은 전통적인 연소식 발전설비와 달리 정상 운전 중 SOx, NOx, 미세먼지 등 대기오염물질 배출이 매우 낮고, 소음이 적으며, 물을 사용하지 않고, 작은 면적에서 많은 전력을 공급할 수 있다고 강조했습니다. ​ 또한 데이터센터가 전력망에 접속하지 않고 독립적으로 발전하면, 데이터센터 전력 수요 때문에 일반 전기요금이 상승하는 문제를 줄일 수 있다고 주장했습니다. → 코멘트: A

7

12 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,540 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @newera1525_1680

다 헛소리죠. 인형 뽑아서 줄 대상이 있다고 자랑하는거입니다

10

12 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈2,500 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

낮에 하루종일 전화돌리고 문자 뿌리고 지키고 고된 뇌를 풀어주러 도박장에 들어갈 뿐입니다..

5

12 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,610 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @silver_mansachs

피카츄아재.. 인형뽑기하느라 바쁜거였구나..

4

12 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,560 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @haetwoPhoto

와 심법의 기초다...저도 인형뽑기 하러 가겠읍니다 '이기고 들어가는 싸움만 들어간다'

10

12 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,440 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupin

네비우스 어닝콜 중 블룸에너지 관련 Q)(모건스탠리 Ryan) 뉴저지 Vineland 데이터센터 사이트 공청회가 표결 없이 산회했는데, 사이트 업데이트를 줄 수 있나? 캐파 진행 상황은? 표결이 아직 없는데 이것이 사이트 램프업 계획에 어떤 영향을 미칠 수 있나? A) Tom (인허가·대외 담당) 답변 "지금 무슨 일이 일어나고 있냐면, 당초 승인받은 site layout plan(부지 배치 계획) 수정안에 대한 최종 승인을 받으려는 중입니다. 그리고 이 배치 계획 수정은 프로젝트의 전력원을 Bloom으로 전환하기로 한 결정에서 비롯된 것입니다." "전반적으로 말씀드리면, Bloom으로의 전환은 프로젝트를 상당히 개선시킨다고 봅니다. 특히 지역사회 관점에서 그렇습니다. 온사이트 전력 솔루션으로, 안정적인 전력을 조용하게, 그리고 초

4

12 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,990 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fundeasyearnings

📊 NBIS 실적발표 (2026년 2분기) 세션: 장전 실적 발표 🎯 실적 퀄리티: 8/10 🟢 주가 반응: +13.34% (장중 잠정) 📮 기업 개요 Nebius Group N.V.는 개발자와 기업이 데이터 준비부터 모델 학습, 추론, 배포까지 수행할 수 있도록 지원하는 풀스택 AI 클라우드 플랫폼을 구축하는 회사다. 📊 핵심 실적 vs 컨센서스 - EPS (Non-GAAP): $-0.32 (예상 $-0.77, +58.44%) - EPS (GAAP): 미공시 - 매출: $7 billion (예상 $375.13M, +1766.02%, YoY N/A%) * (Based on SEC 8-K/10-Q + earnings call transcript) 🗣 경영진 핵심 메시지 경영진은 2분기에 수요가 매우 강했고, 회사의 선제적 용량 확보 전략

8

12 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC≈3,260 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

■ 주제 : 2026년 하반기 AI 및 전력 산업 전망 ■ 일시 : 2026.08.13.(목) 18:00 LIVE ■ 강사 : 삼성액티브자산운용 운용2본부 김효식 팀장, 양희창 매니저 ■ 링크 : https://youtube.com/live/YANE7knC4uo?feature=share 경품 웹세미나 방송 종료 전 설문조사 참여시 추첨을 통해 경품 제공! 1) 다이슨 허쉬젯 미니 쿨 휴대용 선풍기 (1명) 2) 멜리언스 PD35W 5포트 멀티어댑터 (10명) 3) 투썸플레이스 아이스아메리카노R (100명)

14

12 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC≈3,840 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

요새 게을러져서 강제성 부여가 절실함..

24

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @pikachu_aje. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 623,957 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“피카츄 아저씨⚡️” (@pikachu_aje), 25,179 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pikachu_aje.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.