Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

주고생 _ 자료 수집창고

@moonisreport

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

535subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001442081056
TypeChannel
Username@moonisreport
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/moonisreport

Growth

5356 Aug 2026, 14:08 — 535 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:19 — 535 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:086 Aug 2026, 18:19
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 534–536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:19535no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:08535first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.4%
avg views ÷ 535 subscribers
Avg views / post
189
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held19 (5 June 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,513
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
443
Videos
5
Links
1,790

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC341 viewsread 6 August 2026

버핏 형님 현금 곳간 늘어나는 시그널 지속 나왔었는데 역시는 역시였습니다

31 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC345 viewsread 6 August 2026

가장 빠르게 부자가 되려고 할 수록 가장 빠르게 망한다. 늘 새겨야될 문장입니다 ㅎㅎ

31 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC325 viewsread 6 August 2026

원칙과 현금이 빛을 발했던 7월, 고생 많으셨습니다~

15 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC119 viewsread 6 August 2026

손익비 잘 나오는 지점이 간간히 나오더라구요. 그 때를 노리고 있습니당

15 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC111 viewsread 6 August 2026

참고로 저의 포트 변천사는 현대차(과거) -> 삼성전자(현재) -> 소비재(미래) 언제 넘어가야할지 고민 중입니다 ㅎㅎ

15 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC90 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @HANAchina

>>이달부터 PSCMC, 메모리 파운드리 가격 45% 인상 •PSCMC는 메모리 파운드리 가격을 45% 인상한다고 발표했음. 인상된 가격은 11월부터 매출에 반영될 예정임. •이와 함께 자체 개발 DRAM 공정의 양산을 추진하고 있으며, NOR Flash의 월간 웨이퍼 투입량은 1만 장을 돌파했음. 또한 실리콘 인터포저와 WoW 등 첨단 패키징 사업도 동시에 추진하면서 회사의 ‘AI 파운드리’ 전환을 가속화하고 있음. •CEO는 3년 내 AI 관련 매출 비중을 현재 5%에서 20%까지 끌어올리는 것을 목표로 제시 >本月起,力积电存储代工涨价45% https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3777006#from=ios

9 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC87 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @free_life59Photo

#삼성전자 #가이아 9일 업계에 따르면 삼성전자 디바이스솔루션(DS)부문 시스템LSI사업부는 AI PC용 AI 가속기 가이아(GAIA)를 개발 중인 것으로 파악됐다. 이미 시제품을 중국 레노버, 미국 HP 등 주요 고객사에 공급해 성능을 검증하고 있다. 삼성전자는 이르면 내년 양산에 들어간다. 이 칩은 4㎚(나노미터·1㎚는 10억분의 1m) 공정으로 제작된다. 스스로 저장된 정보를 연산할 수 있는 차세대 D램인 프로세싱-인-메모리(PIM)와의 연동도 추진 중이다. 가이아는 PC에서 두뇌 역할을 하는 기존 프로세서와 달리 AI 연산에 특화됐다. 신경망처리장치(NPU)를 최적화한 구조로 PC의 생성형 AI 작업을 효율적으로 수행하도록 설계됐다.

9 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC66 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupin

TSMC 가격 인상 동참… 삼성 4·5나노 및 차량용 8나노 15% 인상설 최근 TSMC가 일부 첨단 공정의 가격을 인상할 것이라는 소식이 전해진 데 이어, 삼성전자(Samsung Electronics) 역시 일부 공정에 대한 단가를 인상할 것이라는 관측이 나왔다. 업계에서는 AI 반도체 수요가 지속적으로 급증함에 따라, 과거 가격 경쟁에 의존해 고객을 유치하던 파운드리(반도체 위탁생산) 시장이 점차 공급자 주도로 전환되고 있다고 분석했다 https://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/dt/n/shwnws.asp?CnlID=1&Cat=40&id=0000761339_NHK24NHV4F6MJG8B168B4

3 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC113 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @habit4117

솔직히 무료인데 매일 새벽 시간에 올라오는 걸 기다리는 분들이 계셔서 가끔 술 마시거나 피곤할 때도 알람 맞춰놓고 일어나서 올리고 다시 잡니다... 쉽지 않습니다.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @moonisreport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 831,027 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“주고생 _ 자료 수집창고” (@moonisreport), 535 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonisreport.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.