7 measurements spanning 7 days, net +146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,132–24,346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:58
24,310
-10
11 Aug 2026, 12:35
24,320
-1
10 Aug 2026, 09:03
24,321
+156
8 Aug 2026, 11:03
24,165
-5
7 Aug 2026, 10:51
24,170
+13
6 Aug 2026, 13:51
24,157
-7
6 Aug 2026, 03:49
24,164
first reading
Engagement
79 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 24,310 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,520
79 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.483%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
79
of 79 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 75 of 79 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
79 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
435,861
Reactions total
2,006
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,110
Videos
≈64
Links
≈3,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,556 reactions across 56 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
903
58.0%
👍
430
27.6%
🔥
208
13.4%
🥰
8
0.514%
👏
7
0.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,006reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
반도체 - 이제는 재평가의 시간
2026.08.13 / KB증권 [김동원·이창민·강다현]
──────────
Top picks: 삼성전자, SK하이닉스 (최선호주)
(목표주가 미제시)
──────────
1. 핵심 한 줄
① 2027년 실적 기준 PER 삼성전자 3.7배·SK하이닉스 3.2배 (8/12 종가 기준) — 극단적 저평가, 내년 실적 개선이 주가에 전혀 미반영
② 양사 합산 영업이익 2025년 91조원 → 2027년 964조원으로 1,000조원 근접, 밸류에이션 재평가 여지 매우 큼
③ 최선호주로 삼성전자, SK하이닉스 제시
──────────
2. 극단적 저평가 구간
① 최근 주가는 과도한 신용 레버리지 물량 청산 여파로 고점 대비 40% 이상 급락, 2027년 실적 기준 PER 3배 수준까지 하락
② 2027년 추정 영업…
[힘겨워진 AI 군비경쟁, 미국은 금융으로 답을 찾았다]
미국이 가장 잘하는 것이 무엇인가.
기술도 아니고 제조도 아니다. 금융이다. 월스트리트가 200년 넘게 쌓아온 자본 조달의 기술. 그것이 지금 AI 군비 경쟁의 해법으로 등장했다.
문제는 숫자였다.
하이퍼스케일러들의 AI 캐펙스가 올해 8000억 달러에 육박한다. 내년엔 1.3조 달러까지 늘어날 전망이다. 미국 국방비 예산을 넘어서는 규모다. 한 나라가 국방에 쓰는 돈보다, 몇 개 기업이 AI에 쓰는 돈이 더 크다.
당연히 우려가 나왔다. 이렇게 쓰다가 하이퍼스케일러들의 잉여현금흐름이 마이너스로 전환되면 어떻게 하나. 아무리 돈을 잘 버는 기업이라도 한계가 있는 것 아닌가.
미국의 답은 금융이었다.
작년 하반기 트럼프 행정부의 OBB(One Big Beautiful) Act…
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
Nebius Group 2026년 2분기 실적 요약
📍실적
• 매출 $582.3M, 컨센서스 $557M 상회
• 조정 EBITDA $236.2M, 컨센서스 $157.9M 상회
• 총 영업비용 $758.2M
• AI 클라우드 매출 $574.9M
• 6월 말 ARR $3.0B, 3월 말 $1.9B 대비 +57.9%
📍가이던스
• 2026년 말 용량 가이던스 5GW로 상향, 5월 제시한 4GW 이상에서 상향
• 2026년 연간 가이던스 재확인
📍핵심 내용
AI 클라우드
• AI 클라우드 매출 $574.9M으로 전체 매출 대부분 차지
• ARR 3개월 만에 $1.9B에서 $3.0B로 $1.1B 증가
• AI 인프라 수요에 대응해 연말 용량 확대 계획 상향
프리마켓 14% 상승
#테마섹 #삼성전자 #SK하이닉스 #한국
12일 관계부처 등에 따르면 싱가포르 테마섹은 최근 삼성전자 와 SK하이닉스 에 대한 투자를 결정하고 투자 집행 시점을 타진하기 위해 한국 정부와 접촉한 것으로 확인됐다.
투자 방식은 외부 자산운용사를 통한 위탁운용이 아닌 내부 인력을 통한 직접 투자 방식을 택한 것으로 전해졌다. 금융당국 한 관계자는 "삼성전자와 SK하이닉스 주가가 최근 정부의 단일종목 레버리지 상장지수펀드(ETF) 허용 이후 극심한 변동성을 보이는 국면에서 자금 집행 시점 등을 타진하기 위해 접촉한 것으로 알고 있다"고 전했다. 테마섹이 한국 증시에 투자하는 것은 이번이 처음이다.
https://view.asiae.co.kr/article/2026081210232989087
앗 내가 그래서 주식을 못하는구나...공감능력이 많은데요 ㅋ
근데 하츄핑 2보고 우는 사람들 보면 이해는 안가긴 했습니다 ㅋ
👍22❤8🔥5🥰1
Signed 리아멍거
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @EarlyStock1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 215,264 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“조기주식회 공부방” (@EarlyStock1), 24,310 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EarlyStock1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
