https://aagag.com/issue/?idx=1646586

Channel
점프
@jump0000
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,058subscribers
+122 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002611684686 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jump0000 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jump0000 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 3,058 | +63 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 2,995 | +63 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 2,932 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 2,936 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 2,936 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.0%
- avg views ÷ 3,058 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 368
- 29 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.453%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 29
- of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,685 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
브린, 구글 AI 지휘권 쥔다…공동창업자 등판 https://naver.me/5OlUIxjf
https://youtu.be/SRwkmrw2JW8?si=L_27DALHnhYL9gsO
점유율 1.6% 대만 난야, 15조원 투자 EUV 공장 건설 https://biz.chosun.com/it-science/ict/2026/08/07/RPBO5BBT3NGMJBG6THDW7GYL7Y/
트럼프: 미국은 세계에서 가장 낮은 금리를 지급해야 한다. 트럼프: 연준의 금리 결정은 워싱턴에 '전혀 올라가지 않을 것' 트럼프, 워싱턴에 대해 언급: "워싱턴에는 매우 정치적인 이사회가 있다" 트럼프, 워싱턴에 대해: "그는 훌륭하다고 생각한다"
트럼프, AI에 대해 언급: 석유보다 클 수 있다 트럼프, AI에 대해 언급: 누가 AI에서 이기든 그 사람이 승리한다. 그만큼 크다.
왼쪽 : 챗GPT vs 오른쪽: 제미나이 어떤 유저가 진짜인지 자기가 한번 더 확인한 결과물 올림 https://m.ruliweb.com/community/board/300143/read/76218106
https://n.news.naver.com/article/023/0003991839?sid=100
🤬2👎1
https://youtu.be/i4EOmcUX4Cc?si=T2uU9QKLyA5VDxLH
SK하이닉스, 엔비디아 HBM 반값 공급설에 "전혀 사실무근" 온라인 커뮤니티발 루머에 공식 부인…업계 "HBM은 개별 협상 구조, 단순 가격 비교 어려워" 솔리다임 상장 가능성까지 거론되며 투자자 불안…SK “확정된 사항 없다” SK하이닉스가 엔비디아에 고대역폭메모리(HBM)를 시세보다 50% 낮은 가격에 공급한다는 소문에 대해 "전혀 사실무근"이라고 일축했다. 7일 업계에 따르면 최근 텔레그램 등 온라인 투자 커뮤니티에서는 SK하이닉스가 엔비디아에 HBM을 시세보다 약 50% 낮은 가격에 공급하는 대신 SK그룹 계열사가 미국 데이터센터용 그래픽처리장치(GPU)를 우선 배정받는다는 주장이 확산됐다. SK하이닉스 "전혀 사실무근"…업계 "가격 단순 비교 어려워" SK하이닉스는 해당 주장을 전면 부인했다. 회사 관계자는 "(시장에 떠도…
❤2
✅ SK하이닉스, 엔비디아 HBM 반값 공급설에 "전혀 사실무근" https://www.inews24.com/view/1993001
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @jump0000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 69,134 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@joongdo · 4,1284 posts메모장
@idea_memo · 8,6902 posts힙한 펭미업의 1인칭 시점
@pengmeup · 9,1432 posts재간둥이 송선생
@songjongsik · 18,3722 posts뉴스/재료 발굴하기
@asrd124gq24gadsgq24gqadcbv · 8591 post뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,7681 post주린이 개소리하는 채널
@Dogrini · 4,8271 post부자고양이
@DorisDD2033 · 4,4541 post재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,1241 post가투방(DCTG) 저장소
@gatubang · 14,6081 post인상주의 투자 인생 업그레이드노트
@insangnism · 11,2351 postBack To The Future 디터
@monsjae · 1561 post추격자 (feat. 온체인)
@OnchaindataChaser · 1641 post용산의 현인
@petrojimmy · 7,0051 post비수(匕首)
@short1141 · 271 postMZ실버만 운동모드 ON
@silver_mansachs · 8,1011 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@bornlupin · 46,8483 posts김치터미널
@KimchiTerminal · 3,1132 posts힙한 펭미업의 1인칭 시점
@pengmeup · 9,1432 posts[하나 Global ETF] 박승진
@globaletfi · 19,2161 post습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 27,4821 post[삼성 전종규] 차이나는 투자전략
@jkc123 · 11,0371 post한국투자증권 패시브영업부
@koreainvestment_passive · 4,2501 post[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 23,2191 post머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,3091 post양파농장
@Onionfarmer · 15,9581 post퀀텀 알고리즘
@quantum_ALGO · 7,4781 post[ IT는 SK ]
@skitteam · 17,6891 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“점프” (@jump0000), 3,058 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jump0000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.