Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Danny Crypton

Channel

Danny Crypton

@danny_crypton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,453subscribers

-573 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001814296135
TypeChannel
Username@danny_crypton
Descriptionhttps://twitter.com/Danny_Crypton
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/danny_crypton

Growth

42,45343,02642,739.57 August 2026 — 43,026 subscribers7 August 2026 — 43,026 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,995 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,958 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,920 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,876 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,826 subscribers13 August 2026 — 42,798 subscribers15 August 2026 — 42,749 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42,667 subscribers17 August 2026 — 42,622 subscribers18 August 2026 — 42,568 subscribers19 August 2026 — 42,541 subscribers20 August 2026 — 42,497 subscribers22 August 2026 — 42,453 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -573. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,367–43,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 00:1442,453-44
20 Aug 2026, 19:1742,497-44
19 Aug 2026, 18:4242,541-27
18 Aug 2026, 20:5342,568-54
17 Aug 2026, 19:1842,622-45
16 Aug 2026, 16:0442,667-82
15 Aug 2026, 00:1642,749-49
13 Aug 2026, 14:0642,798-28
12 Aug 2026, 13:5442,826-50
11 Aug 2026, 12:2642,876-44
10 Aug 2026, 10:1342,920-38
9 Aug 2026, 10:3242,958-37
8 Aug 2026, 07:5742,995-31
7 Aug 2026, 10:0043,026no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:4943,026first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.60%
avg views ÷ 42,453 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.217%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 44 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held48 (27 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total52,894
Reactions total109
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,670
Videos
99
Links
1,730

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 44 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4440.4%
🔥2422.0%
👀2119.3%
🥰1311.9%
😍43.67%
👏32.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 48 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @danny_crypton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC354 viewsread 22 August 2026

🚨 INSANE CRYPTO FLASH CRASH In the LAST HOUR: → $BTC dumped ~$2,000 → $500M+ in positions liquidated → $108 BILLION wiped from crypto One hour. That’s all it took to erase $108B. And I don’t think the volatility is over yet. https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2091095293764767861

21 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC648 viewsread 22 August 2026

🚨 I WARNED YOU ABOUT THIS $BTC PUMP 3 WEEKS AGO Bitcoin did exactly what I expected. The bounce from $63K was never the start of a new Bull Run. It was the setup for one final liquidity trap. Now look at the chart. The first ascending channel ended with a breakdown. The second one is forming almost the exact same structure. My roadmap from here: 👇 https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2090846457855123925

21 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC770 viewsread 22 August 2026

🚨 $BTC JUST HIT $78K THIS BITCOIN PUMP IS MELTING FACES 🔥 But I’m still not convinced this is the start of a new Bull Run. $78K–$80K is a major liquidity zone. If Bitcoin gets rejected here, I expect a fast move back toward $72K–$74K. If bulls reclaim $80K with strength → $84K–$86K becomes the next target. For now, I’m watching the reaction. The next move will tell us everything. https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/s

20 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC844 viewsread 22 August 2026

Prediction markets are the most accurate source of truth. 2,000,000+ markets studied. 97.2% accuracy at close. When the market says 70%, reality happens roughly 70% of the time. The data shows you don't need Wall Street money to produce useful information 👇 https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2090511551958511882

20 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC838 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨 BITCOIN IS SITTING ON THE SAME LEVEL THAT STARTED EVERY MAJOR BULL RUN The 200-week MA has marked the key bottom zone in every major $BTC cycle. 2015 → Mt. Gox aftermath → +7,579% 2018 → Crypto Winter → +1,359% 2022 → FTX collapse → +548% 2026 → 200W MA again → ??? See the pattern? 👇 https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2090442569775804760

🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC842 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨 DON’T GET FOOLED A correction is NOT a reversal. $BTC is doing exactly what I expected. The bounce into $70K–$72K is just the first major retest. Above that, we still have Monthly FVGs around $80K and $95K–$100K. Each bounce can look bullish 👇 https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2090378667247419622

👍2🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC942 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨 WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK !!! THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I WARNED ABOUT. I told you $BTC was setting up for one FINAL Bull Trap before the real dump. Now Bitcoin just exploded +$4,400 in less than an hour and touched $69,500. Over $1 BILLION in shorts got wiped out in 60 minutes. Remember my roadmap: https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2090161634639511717

👍2

19 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC945 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨 $SPCX IS ENTERING ITS FINAL FLUSH $228 top → $143 now. The $150 bounce already failed. I believe the next major move is the one everyone will panic through: $143 → $70–$80 BOTTOM. But that’s exactly where I’ll start paying attention. My roadmap is simple: 👇 https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2090135721084391840

👍1

19 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC928 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨 BITCOIN KEEPS “CRASHING” HIGHER 2010 $BTC crashes to $0.10 2011 crashes to $1 2013 crashes to $50 2015 crashes to $200 2018 crashes to $3,000 2022 crashes to $15,000 2024 crashes to $39,000 2026 crashes to $60,000 Every “disaster” ends at a level the previous cycle could only dream of. Notice anything? https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2090032797037506922

🔥4

18 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC943 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨 $BTC IS FOLLOWING MY ROADMAP ALMOST PERFECTLY Bitcoin dropped straight to $62K. Now I’m watching the $70K–$72K FVG before what I believe could be the FINAL Bull Trap of this move. Here’s my roadmap for next 2-3 months: 👇 https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2089692090112352632

😍2

17 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC951 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨 DON'T BUY $SPCX HERE The bounce is real. But this is NOT the accumulation phase yet. The post-IPO roadmap is still playing out almost exactly as expected: 👇 https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2089437956415390149

👍3

17 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC999 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨 EVERY MEGA IPO HAS MARKED THE END OF A BUBBLE This pattern has repeated for almost 100 YEARS. 1928 → Goldman Sachs IPO → 1929 crash: -86% 1971 → Intel IPO → 1973 crash: -53% 2000 → AT&T Wireless IPO → dot-com crash: -51% 2026 → Anthropic IPO → 2026 crash: **% Every time, one of the biggest IPO of the era arrived near the peak of a major market cycle 👇 https://x.com/Danny_Crypton/status/2089305328550551972

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @danny_crypton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rekt Fencer
@rektfencer_threads · 79,215
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Danny Crypton” (@danny_crypton), 42,453 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danny_crypton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.